Cited by 727Urban Green Space and HealthPlace Attachment and Urban StudiesEnvironmental Philosophy and Ethics

Preference for Nature in Urbanized Societies: Stress, Restoration, and the Pursuit of Sustainability

Open access
Van Den Berg, Agnes E., Hartig, Terry, Staats, Henk·2007·Journal of Social Issues

Abstract

Urbanicity presents a challenge for the pursuit of sustainability. High settlement density may offer some environmental, economic, and social advantages, but it can impose psychological demands that people find excessive. These demands of urban life have stimulated a desire for contact with nature through suburban residence, leading to planning and transportation practices that have profound implications for the pursuit of sustainability. Some might dismiss people's desire for contact with nature as the result of an anti‐urban bias in conjunction with a romantic view of nature. However, research in environmental psychology suggests that people's desire for contact with nature serves an important adaptive function, namely, psychological restoration. Based on this insight, we offer a perspective on an underlying practical challenge: designing communities that balance settlement density with satisfactory access to nature experience. We discuss research on four issues: how people tend to believe that nature is restorative; how restoration needs and beliefs shape environmental preferences; how well people actually achieve restoration in urban and natural environments; and how contact with nature can promote health. In closing, we consider urban nature as a design option that promotes urban sustainability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00497.x

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Den Berg, A. E., Hartig, T., & Staats, H.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Leiden University (NL)
Venue
Journal of Social Issues
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-02-16
Volume
63
Issue
1
Pages
79-96
ISSN
  • 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4560
OpenAlex
W2108250337
Cited by
727
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 46
FWCI
20.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Social Issues (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Place Attachment and Urban Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
Keywords
nature exposure, psychological restoration, urbanicity, settlement density, urban sustainability, environmental preferences, environmental stress, urban nature, suburban residence, environmental psychology, health benefits of nature, community design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review