Cited by 1,197Urban Green Space and HealthSleep and Work-Related FatigueNoise Effects and Management

Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity

Berto, Rita·2005·Journal of Environmental Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.07.001

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berto, R.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
Berto, Rita
Venue
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-09
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
249-259
ISSN
0272-4944 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027532785
Cited by
1,197
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 99 · 2025: 110 · 2024: 118 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 34
FWCI
5.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Environmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Università degli Studi di Padova
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Urban Green Space and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Noise Effects and Management
Keywords
restorative environments, mental fatigue, attention restoration theory, sustained attention, attentional capacity, nature exposure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review