Cited by 159Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political ViolenceGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

Social Sharing, Participation in Demonstrations, Emotional Climate, and Coping with Collective Violence After the March 11th Madrid Bombings1

Páez, Darío, Basabe, Nekane, Ubillos, Silvia, González‐Castro, José Luis·2007·Journal of Social Issues

Abstract

This study examined how social sharing and participating in secular political rituals regarding the March‐Eleven (M‐11) 2004 train bombings in Madrid, Spain, helps to cope with the wounds of trauma and enhances the reconstruction of a positive emotional climate. A questionnaire was completed by college students (63% of sample) and their relatives (37%) (N = 661) from five Spanish regions and eight universities at 1, 3, and 8 weeks after the bombing. Participating in demonstrations and experiencing a positive emotional climate, as reported a week after M‐11, predicted the degree of social support and positive affect as well as the amount of posttraumatic growth reported at the 3‐week period. Demonstrations (indirectly) and social sharing (directly) predict positive emotional climate 2 months after the attack. Participation in protest rituals or demonstrations, coupled with elections and changes in government office, helps overcome the effects of collective trauma and leads to an improvement of the emotional climate in the aftermath of a terrorist attack. Participating in ceremonies and rituals reinforces social cohesion and can be conceived of as a communal form of coping, which enhances a culture of peace.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00511.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Performing interpersonal rituals can improve closeness in groups even when group members do not reveal an explicit need for connection or belonging.

    “For example, performing interpersonal rituals can improve closeness in groups even when the group members do not reveal any explicit need for connection or belonging (Páez, Basabe, Ubillos, & González-Castro, 2007;Ruffle & Sosis, 2007;Sosis & Ruffle, 2003;Wen, Herrmann, & Legare, 2016).”

    From The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework (2018) · cites this paper as Páez, Basabe, Ubillos, & González-Castro, 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Páez, D., Basabe, N., Ubillos, S., & González‐Castro, J. L.
Affiliations
University of the Basque Country (ES)
Corresponding author
Páez, Darío
Venue
Journal of Social Issues
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-06
Volume
63
Issue
2
Pages
323-337
ISSN
  • 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-4560
OpenAlex
W2116740193
Cited by
159
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Social Issues (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
collective trauma, posttraumatic growth, social sharing, protest participation, demonstrations, emotional climate, positive affect, social support, communal coping, social cohesion, culture of peace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review