Cited by 4Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchResilience and Mental HealthCancer survivorship and care

Posttraumatic growth, posttraumatic depreciation and beyond: Exploring the applicability of quantitative measures in Sierra Leone

Open access
Steidl, Andreas, Kamara, Aruna, Aziz, Abdul, Exenberger, Silvia·2024·European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation

Abstract

: People report of both, posttraumatic growth (PTG) and posttraumatic depreciation (PTD) after experiencing traumatic events. This study's aim in Sierra Leone was to explore the applicability of the expanded Posttraumatic Growth and Depreciation Inventory (PTGDI-X) and to examine the relationship between PTG and PTD, alongside predictive theory-driven variables. We also investigated communal and societal PTG, using the Individual and Collective Posttraumatic Growth Scale (ICPTGS). : The PTGDI-X factorial structure was evaluated by confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) of data of 280 students who met DSM-5 trauma criteria. 219 participants, indicating that the event affected their community, and 113 participants, reporting it to have transformed the Sierra Leonean society, answered to the ICPTGS. : The PTGDI-X factor structure, proposed as cross-culturally invariant, was not applicable to the Sierra Leonean sample, but the use of the instrument's total scores was. PTG and PTD were found to co-exist, with predictive variables showing significant impacts on both constructs (e.g., disclosure, core beliefs disruption). Collective PTG outcomes in Sierra Leone were confirmed. : The findings indicated to measure PTG and PTD together, however top-down approaches to reveal only limited culture specific insights. A broader conceptualization of growth, beyond the personal level was recommended.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejtd.2024.100401

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Müller, 2000, Kommunikationsverhalten nach politischer Haft in der DDR - Entwicklung eines Fragebogens zum Offenlegen der Traumaerfahrungen [Communication after political imprisonment: Disclosure of the traumatic experiences], Zeitschrift fuer Politische Psychologie, 8, 413

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steidl, A., Kamara, A., Aziz, A., & Exenberger, S.
Affiliations
  • Universität Innsbruck (AT)
  • Freetown Polytechnic (SL)
  • University of Makeni (SL)
  • Innsbruck Medical University (AT)
Corresponding author
Steidl, Andreas
Venue
European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-06
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
100401
ISSN
2468-7499 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392640694
Cited by
4
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Universität Innsbruck
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
posttraumatic growth, cross-cultural validity, factor structure, traumatic events, disclosure, core beliefs, Sierra Leone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review