Cited by 284Religion and Society InteractionsMigration, Refugees, and IntegrationPopulism, Right-Wing Movements

Divine Boundaries: How Religion Shapes Citizens’ Attitudes Toward Immigrants

Leon McDaniel, Eric, Nooruddin, Irfan, Faith Shortle, Allyson·2011·American Politics Research

Abstract

How does religion affect one’s attitudes toward immigrants? Scholars have shown that members of minor religious groups are less anti-immigrant than members of majority affiliations and that Evangelical Protestants are particularly hostile. Other scholars have demonstrated that increased religiosity reduces immigrant animus. Here, we argue that religion affects immigration attitudes via a distinct religiously informed interpretation of America’s national identity, which we call Christian nationalism. Christian nationalists believe that America has a divinely inspired mission and link its success to God’s favor. Using social identity complexity theory, we argue that citizens who ascribe to this worldview should be least tolerant of those they perceive as symbolic threats to American national identity. We assess this claim using the 2006 Pew Immigration Attitudes Survey and the 2008 Cooperative Congressional Election Survey. Christian nationalism is a robust determinant of immigrant animus, whereas religious affiliation only affects immigrant animus when Christian nationalism is excluded.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1532673x10371300

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Christian nationalism in the United States strongly predicts prejudice toward immigrants.

    “McDaniel et al. (2011) demonstrate that Christian nationalism in the United States-i.e., the belief that the United States has a special relationship with God, placing it above other nations-strongly predicts prejudice toward immigrants.”

    From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as McDaniel et al. 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leon McDaniel, E., Nooruddin, I., & Faith Shortle, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
Corresponding author
Nooruddin, Irfan
Venue
American Politics Research
Published
2010-09-09
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
205-233
ISSN
  • 0044-7803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-673X
  • 1552-3373
OpenAlex
W2152597468
Cited by
284
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 1
FWCI
14.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Politics Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Keywords
Christian nationalism, immigration attitudes, anti-immigrant sentiment, religious affiliation, national identity, evangelical Christians, symbolic threat, religious minorities, American exceptionalism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review