Cited by 347Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationFiscal Policies and Political EconomyPublic Administration and Political Analysis

How Lasting Is Voter Gratitude? An Analysis of the Short- and Long-term Electoral Returns to Beneficial Policy

Open access
Bechtel, Michael M., Hainmueller, Jens·2011·American Journal of Political Science

Abstract

Dominant theories of electoral behavior emphasize that voters myopically evaluate policy performance and that this shortsightedness may obstruct the welfare‐improving effect of democratic accountability. However, we know little about how long governments receive electoral credit for beneficial policies. We exploit the massive policy response to a major natural disaster, the 2002 Elbe flooding in Germany, to provide an upper bound for the short‐ and long‐term electoral returns to targeted policy benefits. We estimate that the flood response increased vote shares for the incumbent party by 7 percentage points in affected areas in the 2002 election. Twenty‐five percent of this short‐term reward carried over to the 2005 election before the gains vanished in the 2009 election. We conclude that, given favorable circumstances, policy makers can generate voter gratitude that persists longer than scholarship has acknowledged so far, and elaborate on the implications for theories of electoral behavior, democratic accountability, and public policy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00533.x

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bechtel, M. M., & Hainmueller, J.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
  • Bechtel, Michael M.
  • Hainmueller, Jens
Venue
American Journal of Political Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-07-27
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
852-868
ISSN
  • 0092-5853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-5907
OpenAlex
W2110936351
Cited by
63
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
13.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (acceptedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
Keywords
election returns, policy performance, democratic accountability, disaster relief, incumbent vote share, voting behavior, Bundestag election

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review