Cited by 26Cardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Frequent additional tachyarrhythmias in patients with inappropriate sinus tachycardia undergoing sinus node modification: an important cause of symptom recurrence

FRANKEL, DAVID S, LIN, DAVID, ANASTASIO, NICHOLAS, MOUNTANTONAKIS, STAVROS E, DIXIT, SANJAY, GERSTENFELD, EDWARD P, HUTCHINSON, MATHEW D, RILEY, MICHAEL P +2 more·2012·Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Symptom recurrence following sinus node modification (SNM) for inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST) remains significant despite achieving acute procedural success. The impact of non-IST tachyarrhythmias on symptom recurrence remains poorly characterized. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to determine the prevalence and nature of additional tachyarrhythmias preceding and following SNM for IST. METHODS: Consecutive patients with IST undergoing SNM at the University of Pennsylvania were studied. SNM was initially performed using an anatomic approach targeting the superolateral crista terminalis under intracardiac echocardiographic guidance and later using an electrophysiologic approach, targeting the site of the earliest right atrial activation during maximum heart rate (HR) with isoproterenol infusion. An effort was made to shift the site more caudally until a decrease of >25% in resting HR was achieved, with a blunted response to isoproterenol and flattening of the P-wave axis in leads III and aVF. Patients were followed for arrhythmia recurrence. Tachyarrhythmias were documented with electrocardiographic monitoring and then characterized during EP study. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients underwent SNM and were followed for a mean of 2.0 ± 1.5 years. During follow-up, 27% developed a non-IST tachyarrhythmia and 18% developed recurrent IST. Additionally, 42% of patients had a non-IST tachyarrhythmia prior to SNM. CONCLUSIONS: Non-IST tachyarrhythmias are common in patients with IST before and after SNM. A major reason for symptom recurrence following SNM is development of a non-IST tachyarrhythmia. These tachyarrhythmias should be detected and treated to optimize patient outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02297.x

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ablation can be fruitless because tachycardia might ultimately come from other sinus nodal sites or from the AV junction after complete sinus node obliteration.

    “Ablation can be fruitless as tachycardia might ultimately come from other sinus nodal sites or from the AV junction after complete sinus node obliteration. 97”

    From Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (2019) · cites this paper as [97]

  • Patients with IST tend to have frequent other tachycardias even if the sinus node is ablated.

    “A more recent report indicated that patients with IST tend to have frequent other tachycardias even if the sinus node is ablated.”

    From Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (2019) · cites this paper as [97]

  • Minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery with bipolar radiofrequency clamp or cryoablation, isolation of the superior right atrium, and inferior vena cava isolation are alternative approaches.

    “Minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgery with use of bipolar radiofrequency clamp or cryoablation, 75,205,215–219, isolation of the superior right atrium from the rest of the atrium217,218,220, and inferior vena cava isolation 205,217 are alternative approaches.”

    From Sinus Tachycardia: a Multidisciplinary Expert Focused Review (2022) · cites this paper as [219]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
FRANKEL, D. S., LIN, D., ANASTASIO, N., MOUNTANTONAKIS, S. E., DIXIT, S., GERSTENFELD, E. P., HUTCHINSON, M. D., RILEY, M. P., MARCHLINSKI, F. E., & CALLANS, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • North Shore University Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
  • FRANKEL, DAVID S
  • LIN, DAVID
  • CALLANS, DAVID J
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04-04
Volume
23
Issue
8
Pages
835-839
ISSN
  • 1045-3873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-8167
OpenAlex
W2114856406
Cited by
26
References
16
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
inappropriate sinus tachycardia, symptom recurrence, isoproterenol response, P wave axis
MeSH terms
Adrenergic beta-Agonists, Adult, Female, Heart Rate, Hospitals, University, Humans, Isoproterenol, Male, Middle Aged, Pennsylvania, Predictive Value of Tests, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Sinoatrial Node, Tachycardia, Tachycardia, Sinus, Time Factors, Prevalence, Multivariate Analysis, Chi-Square Distribution, Proportional Hazards Models, Treatment Outcome, Catheter Ablation, Risk Assessment, Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review