Cited by 570Social Sciences and HumanitiesWater Governance and InfrastructureFeminism, Gender, and Intersectionality

Suffering for water, suffering from water: Emotional geographies of resource access, control and conflict

Sultana, Farhana·2011·Geoforum

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.12.002

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sultana, F.
Affiliations
Syracuse University (US)
Corresponding author
Sultana, Farhana
Venue
Geoforum
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
163-172
ISSN
0016-7185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077663087
Cited by
570
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 73 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
88.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geoforum (publishedVersion)
Funders
Department for International Development
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Sciences and Humanities
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality
Keywords
emotional geographies, water conflicts, drinking water contamination, gendered subjectivity, embodied emotion, access to resources, resource control, resource conflicts, feminist political ecology, nature-society relations, Bangladesh

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review