Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 503

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

EXPERIMENTAL MANIPULATION OF PUTATIVE SELECTIVE AGENTS PROVIDES EVIDENCE FOR THE ROLE OF NATURAL ENEMIES IN THE EVOLUTION OF PLANT DEFENSE

Mauricio, Rodney, Rausher, Mark D.·1997·Evolution

Abstract

Although biologists have long assumed that plant resistance characters evolved under selection exerted by such natural enemies as herbivores and pathogens, experimental evidence for this assumption is sparse. We present evidence that natural enemies exert selection on particular plant resistance characters. Specifically, we demonstrate that elimination of natural enemies from an experimental field population of Arabidopsis thaliana alters the pattern of selection on genetic variation in two characters that have been shown to reduce herbivore damage in the field: total glucosinolate concentration and trichome density. The change in pattern of selection reveals that natural enemies imposed selection favoring increased glucosinolate concentration and increased trichome density, and thus, supports one of the major assumptions of the coevolution hypothesis. We also demonstrate that a pattern of stabilizing selection on glucosinolate concentration results from a balance between the costs and benefits associated with increasing levels of this resistance character. This result provides direct confirmation of the appropriateness of cost-benefit models for characterizing the evolution of plant defenses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb01467.x

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Abbott R. J., 1987, Outcrossing rates in natural populations of Arabidopsis thaliana., Arabidopsis Inf. Serv., 25, 85
  2. 10.1086/285593 · doi:10.1086/285593
  3. Alexander H. M., 1992, Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens, 326
  4. 10.1139/b72-049 · doi:10.1139/b72-049
  5. 10.1126/science.201.4355.532 · doi:10.1126/science.201.4355.532
  6. 10.1111/j.1570-7458.1978.tb02779.x · doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.1978.tb02779.x
  7. 10.1126/science.200.4347.1296 · doi:10.1126/science.200.4347.1296
  8. Burdon J. J., 1987, Diseases and plant population biology
  9. 10.1142/9789814439701_0017 · doi:10.1142/9789814439701_0017
  10. 10.2307/2389708 · doi:10.2307/2389708
  11. Futuyma D. J., 1983, Coevolution, 207
  12. Gomes M. F., 1987, Genotypic diversity in British populations of Arabidopsis thaliana based on a survey of isozyme variation., Arabidopsis Inf. Serv., 23, 25
  13. 10.1039/np9860300217 · doi:10.1039/np9860300217
  14. Heaney R. K., 1981, A micro‐column method for the rapid determination of total glucosinolate content of cruciferous material., Z. Pflanzenzücht., 87, 89
  15. Jermy T., 1976, Insect‐host‐plant relationship‐co‐evolution or sequential evolution?, Symp. Biol. Hung., 16, 109
  16. 10.1007/BF02860838 · doi:10.1007/bf02860838
  17. 10.1086/283402 · doi:10.1086/283402
  18. 10.1038/hdy.1971.69 · doi:10.1038/hdy.1971.69
  19. Juniper B. E., 1986, Insects and the plant surface
  20. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1992.tb01337.x · doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1992.tb01337.x
  21. Kilian A., 1987, Genetic variability of Arabidopsis thaliana populations from regions of different pollution level., Arabidopsis Inf. Serv., 25, 57
  22. Kilian A., 1985, Analysis of the variability of Arabidopsis thaliana natural populations in Poland., Arabidopsis Inf. Serv., 22, 77
  23. 10.4141/cjps80-200 · doi:10.4141/cjps80-200
  24. Lawrence M. J., 1976, The biology and chemistry of the Cruciferae, 167
  25. Marquis R. J., 1992, Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens, 301
  26. 10.2307/1940399 · doi:10.2307/1940399
  27. Morgan O. D., 1971, A study of four weed hosts of Sclerotinia species in alfalfa fields., Plant Dis. Rep., 55, 1087
  28. 10.1126/science.164.3876.197 · doi:10.1126/science.164.3876.197
  29. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb01321.x · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb01321.x
  30. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05257.x · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb05257.x
  31. 10.1093/ee/12.2.446 · doi:10.1093/ee/12.2.446
  32. SAS Institute, 1988, SAS'GRAPH user's guide. Vers. 6.03 ed
  33. SAS Institute, 1989, SAS'STAT user's guide. Vers. 6.03 ed
  34. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01252.x · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01252.x
  35. 10.1038/hdy.1971.91 · doi:10.1038/hdy.1971.91
  36. 10.1007/BF00983770 · doi:10.1007/bf00983770
  37. Trnená L., 1987, High outcrossing rates in a partially fertile line and their significance in the genetic structure of populations in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh., Arabidopsis Inf. Serv., 23, 31
  38. 10.1094/PD-76-0539A · doi:10.1094/pd-76-0539a
  39. Vaughan J. G., 1976, The biology and chemistry of the Cruciferae
  40. 10.1515/znc-1985-11-1204 · doi:10.1515/znc-1985-11-1204

Cited by

See all 503

Metadata

Authors
Mauricio, R., & Rausher, M. D.
Venue
Evolution
Published
1997-10
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
1435-1444
ISSN
  • 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-5646
OpenAlex
W2327426319
Cited by
503
References
53
FWCI
26.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (DEB 93‐22462)
  • North Carolina Academy of Science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EXPERIMENTAL MANIPULATION OF PUTATIVE SELECTIVE AGENTS PROVIDES EVIDENCE FOR THE ROLE OF NATURAL ENEMIES IN THE EVOLUTION OF PLANT DEFENSE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb01467.x
The paper
Mauricio, R., & Rausher, M. D. (1997). EXPERIMENTAL MANIPULATION OF PUTATIVE SELECTIVE AGENTS PROVIDES EVIDENCE FOR THE ROLE OF NATURAL ENEMIES IN THE EVOLUTION OF PLANT DEFENSE. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb01467.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.