The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk Area Residents’ Perceptions and Adoption of Seismic Hazard Adjustments1
Abstract
Residents of 2 geographical regions—one with a high seismic hazard and the other with a moderate seismic hazard—rated 16 hazard adjustments on 7 attributes and reported their adoption intention and actual adoption of those adjustments. There were only small and generally nonsignificant differences between the 2 locations in adjustments’ attribute ratings, adoption intention, and actual adjustment, but there were significant differences among adjustments on all of these measures. Perceptions of hazard‐related adjustment attributes were correlated significantly with adoption intention and actual adjustment, but perceptions of resource‐related attributes were not.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These three studies (Lindell and Whitney 2000;Lindell and Prater 2002;Terpstra and Lindell 2012) find that perceived response-efficacy significantly and positively influences the adoption of preparedness intentions and behaviors.”
From Household preparedness motivation in lahar hazard zones: assessing the adoption of preparedness behaviors among laypeople and response professionals in communities downstream from Mount Baker and Glacier Peak (USA) volcanoes (2017) · cites this paper as Lindell and Prater 2002
In the citing paper
“demonstrate that high perceived response-efficacy is helpful, perhaps necessary, for motivating the adoption of hazard adjustments.”
From Household preparedness motivation in lahar hazard zones: assessing the adoption of preparedness behaviors among laypeople and response professionals in communities downstream from Mount Baker and Glacier Peak (USA) volcanoes (2017) · cites this paper as Lindell and Prater 2002
In the citing paper
“Lindell and Whitney (2000), Lindell and Prater (2002), and Terpstra and Lindell (2012) also apply indirect measures of the importance of hazard adjustment attributes.”
From Household preparedness motivation in lahar hazard zones: assessing the adoption of preparedness behaviors among laypeople and response professionals in communities downstream from Mount Baker and Glacier Peak (USA) volcanoes (2017) · cites this paper as Lindell and Prater (2002)
Citations
Cites
Stalking the elusive “vividness” effect
Taylor, S. E., & Thompson, S. C. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.89.2.155 · Cited by 913
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- 10.1037/0033-295X.86.5.452 · DOI
- Davis M. S., 1989, Living along the fault line: An update on earthquake awareness and preparedness in southern California, Urban Resources, 5, 8
- 10.1515/9781503620766 · DOI · Paper page
- Fishbein M. F., 1975, Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research
- Garcia E. M., 1989, Earthquake preparedness in California: A survey of Irvine residents, Urban Resources, 5, 15
- 10.1521/jscp.1996.15.1.9 · DOI
- 10.1006/obhd.1996.0103 · DOI
- Jackson E. L., 1974, Natural hazards: Local, national, and global, 160
- Kunreuther H., 1978, Disaster insurance protection: Public policy lessons
- Lindell M. K., 1992, Behavioral foundations of community emergency planning
- 10.1177/00139160021972621 · DOI · Paper page
- Lindell M. K., 2000, Household adoption of seismic hazard adjustments: A comparison of residents in two states, InternationalJournal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 18, 317, 10.1177/028072700001800203 · DOI
- 10.1111/0272-4332.00002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF02393621 · DOI
- Mileti D. S., 1999, Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States
- 10.2307/3096875 · DOI
- Mileti D. S., 1993, The great earthquake experiment: Risk communication and public action
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb02620.x · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00124393 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb00429.x · DOI
- Palm R., 1995, Earthquake insurance: A longitudinal study of California homeowners
- Palm R., 1990, Earthquake insurance in California
- 10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803 · DOI · Paper page
- Rogers R. W., 1997, Handbook of health behavior and research. Vol. I: Personal and social determinants, 113
- 10.1177/0013916595276002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0092-6566(84)90016-3 · DOI
- U.S. Department of Commerce., 1994, County and city data book
- 10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
The Protective Action Decision Model: Theoretical Modifications and Additional Evidence
Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W. (2012) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x · Cited by 1,868
Self-citationCorwin, K. A., Brand, B. D., Hubbard, M. L., & Johnston, D. M. (2017) · Journal of Applied Volcanology · doi:10.1186/s13617-017-0055-8 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Lindell, M. K., & Prater, C. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2377-2392
- ISSN
- 0021-9029
- 1559-1816
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review