Cited by 162Behavioral Health and InterventionsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesYouth, Drugs, and Violence

Applying an Extended Version of the Theory of Planned Behavior to Illicit Drug Use Among Students1

Mcmillan, Brian, Conner, Mark·2003·Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Abstract

This study employed the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to investigate the factors underlying intentions to use and use of LSD, amphetamine, cannabis, and ecstasy over 6 months in a sample of students (N= 461). The TPB provided good predictions of both intentions (mean R2= .49) and behavior (mean R2= .45). Descriptive norms explained additional variance in intentions for all the drugs, and moral norms explained additional variance in cannabis intentions. Attitude variability moderated the impact of attitudes on intentions for LSD (p < .10) and ecstasy (p < .05). Attitude moderated the impact of perceived behavioral control (PBC) on intentions for all drugs (p < .001). PBC moderated the impact of intentions on behavior for LSD (p < .05), amphetamine (p < .10), cannabis (p < .05), and ecstasy (p < .10). These interaction effects elucidate limiting conditions among the variables in the TPB.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01968.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on descriptive norms has focused typically on the prediction of anti-social behaviours, with little research on the prediction of pro-social or altruistic behaviours.

    “Moreover, research on descriptive norms has focused typically on the prediction of anti-social behaviours such as littering behaviour (Cialdini et al., 1990) or illicit drug use (McMillan & Conner, 2003), with little research on the prediction of pro-social or altruistic behaviours (cf. Warburton & Terry, 2000).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mcmillan, B., & Conner, M.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Mcmillan, Brian
Venue
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-08
Volume
33
Issue
8
Pages
1662-1683
ISSN
  • 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-1816
OpenAlex
W2025689137
Cited by
162
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Youth, Drugs, and Violence
Keywords
theory of planned behavior, illicit drug use, students, LSD, amphetamine, cannabis, ecstasy, drug use intentions, descriptive norms, moral norms, perceived behavioral control, moderating effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review