Cited by 911Names, Identity, and Discrimination ResearchExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesLabor market dynamics and wage inequality

Field Experiments of Discrimination in the Market Place

Open access
Riach, P. A., Rich, J.·2002·The Economic Journal

Abstract

Controlled experiments, using matched pairs of bogus transactors, to test for discrimination in the marketplace have been conducted for over 30 years, and have extended across 10 countries. Significant, persistent and pervasive levels of discrimination have been found against non‐whites and women in labour, housing and product markets. Rates of employment discrimination against non‐whites, in excess of 25% have been measured in Australia, Europe and North America. A small number of experiments have also investigated employment discrimination against the disabled in Britain and the Netherlands, and against older applicants in the United States.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1468-0297.00080

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Skin tone (colorism) has long been identified as among the most salient markers for discrimination.

    “Skin tone (i.e., colorism) has long been identified as among the most salient markers for discrimination (10, 11).”

    From Nobel and novice: Author prominence affects peer review (2022) · cites this paper as [11]

    The discussion of employment experiments (p. F491) distinguishes discrimination based on colour from discrimination based on national origin, and the later discussion reports greater discrimination against non-white than white immigrant groups (pp. F499–F502). These passages support colour as a longstanding marker in employment discrimination, but they do not establish that skin-tone variation (colorism) is among the most salient markers of discrimination generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Altonji, J and Blank, R. (1999). 'Race and gender in the labor market', in (O. Ashenfelter and D. Card. eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 3, chapter 48.
  2. Ayres, I. and Siegelman, P. (1995). 'Gender and race discrimination in bargaining for a new car', American Economic Review, vol. 85, pp. 304-21.
  3. Bovenkerk, F., Kilborne, B., Raveau, F., and Smith, D. (1979). 'Comparative aspects of research on discrimination against non-white citizens in Great Britain, France and the Netherlands', in (J. Berting, F. Geyer and R. Jurkovich, eds), Problems in International Comparative Research in the Social Sciences, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  4. Cross, H., Kenney, J., Mell, J., and Zimmermann, W. (1990). Employer Hiring Practices: Differential Treat- ment of Hispanic and Anglo Job Seekers, Washington DC: The Urban Institute Press.
  5. Daniel, W. (1968). Racial Discrimination in England, Middlesex: Penguin Books.
  6. Daniel, W. (1970). 'Reply to a 'Note on the testing of discrimination', Race, vol. 11, pp. 352-60.
  7. Darity, W. Jnr. and Mason, P. (1998). 'Evidence on discrimination in employment: codes of color, codes of gender', Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 12, pp. 63-90.
  8. Darity, W. Jnr. and Nembhard, J. (2000). 'Racial and ethnic economic inequality: the international record', American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, vol. 90 (May), pp. 308-11.
  9. Esmail, A. and Everington, S. (1997). 'Asian doctors are still being discriminated against', British Medical Journal, vol. 314, p. 1619.
  10. Firth, M. (1982). 'Sex discrimination in job opportunities for women', Sex Roles, vol. 34, pp. 265-72.
  11. Fix, M. and Struyk, R. (1993). Clear and Convincing Evidence: Measurement of Discrimination in America, Washington DC: The Urban Institute Press.
  12. Fix, M., Galster, G., and Struyk, R. (1993). 'An overview of auditing for discrimination', in (M. Fix and R. Struyk eds.) Clear and Convincing Evidence: Measurement of Discrimination in America. Washington DC, The Urban Institute Press.
  13. Gunderson, M. (1989). 'Male-female wage differentials and policy responses', Journal of Economic Lit- erature, vol. 27, pp. 46-72.
  14. James, F. and DelCastillo, S. (1992). 'Measuring job discrimination: hopeful evidence from recent audits', Harvard Journal of African American Public Policy, vol. 1, pp. 33-53.
  15. Kenney, G. and Wissoker, D. (1994). 'An analysis of the correlates of discrimination facing young Hispanic job-seekers', American Economic Review, vol. 84, pp. 674-83.
  16. Oaxaca, R. (1973). 'Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets', International Economic Review, vol. 14, pp. 693-709.
  17. Phelps, E. (1972). 'The statistical theory of racism and sexism', American Economic Review, vol. 62, pp. 659-61.
  18. Riach, P. and Rich, J. (1991). 'Testing for racial discrimination in the labour market', Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 15, pp. 239-56.
  19. Yinger, J. (1986). 'Measuring discrimination with fair housing audits: caught in the act', American Economic Review, vol. 76, pp. 881-93.
  20. Yinger, J. (1998). Testing for Discrimination in Housing and Related Markets. In (M. Fix and M. Turner, eds.), A National Report Card on Discrimination in America. The Role of Testing, Washington D.C., The Urban Institute Press. 2002
  21. Yinger, J. (1998b). 'Testing for discrimination in housing and related markets', in (M. Fix and M. Turner, eds), A National Report Card on Discrimination in America: The Role of Testing, Washington DC: The Urban Institute Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Riach, P. A., & Rich, J.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • IZA - Institute of Labor Economics (DE)
Venue
The Economic Journal
Published
2002-11-01
Volume
112
Issue
483
Pages
F480-F518
ISSN
  • 0013-0133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-0297
OpenAlex
W2091411296
Cited by
911
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 49
FWCI
24.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Economic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Keywords
employment discrimination, racial discrimination, gender discrimination, housing discrimination, disabled workers, older workers, matched pairs, field experiments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review