The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of seven potential probiotic strains on specific immune responses in healthy adults: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
Abstract
This pilot study investigated the immunomodulatory properties of seven probiotic strains. Eighty-three healthy volunteers aged 18-62 years consumed 2 x 10(10) CFU of bacteria or a placebo (maltodextrin) over 3 weeks (D0-D21). Subjects received an oral cholera vaccine at D7 and at D14; blood and saliva samples were collected at D0, D21 and D28. Serum samples were analyzed for specific IgA, IgG and IgM, and saliva samples were analyzed for specific IgA only, by ELISA. Statistical analyses were based on Wilcoxon's signed-rank test (intragroup analyses) and exact median t-test (intergroup analyses). Salivary analysis showed no difference in specific IgA concentrations between groups. Serum analysis indicated an effect of some of the tested strains on specific humoral responses. Between D0 and D21, IgG increased in two probiotic groups, for example, Bifidobacterium lactis Bl-04 and Lactobacillus acidophilus La-14, compared with controls (P=0.01). Trends toward significant changes in immunoglobulin serum concentrations compared with controls (P<0.1) were found for six out of the seven probiotic strains. In conclusion, some strains of probiotics demonstrated a faster immune response measured with serum immunoglobulin indicators, especially IgG, although overall vaccination was not influenced. Specific strains of probiotics may thus act as adjuvants to the humoral immune response following oral vaccination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gill, H. S., Rutherfurd, K. J., Cross, M. L., & Gopal, P. K. (2001) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/74.6.833 · Cited by 485
de Vrese, M., Winkler, P., Rautenberg, P., Harder, T., Noah, C., Laue, C., Ott, S., Hampe, J., Schreiber, S., Heller, K., et al. (2006) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.048 · Cited by 201
Cited by
Factors That Influence the Immune Response to Vaccination
Zimmermann, P., & Curtis, N. (2019) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00084-18 · Cited by 939
Immune System Stimulation by Probiotic Microorganisms
Ashraf, R., & Shah, N. P. (2014) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2011.619671 · Cited by 549
Haukioja, A. (2010) · European Journal of Dentistry · doi:10.1055/s-0039-1697851 · Cited by 239
Human gut microbiota and its relationship to health and disease: Nutrition Reviews©, Vol. 69, No. 7
Wallace, T. C., Guarner, F., Madsen, K., Cabana, M. D., Gibson, G., Hentges, E., & Sanders, M. E. (2011) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.2011.00402.x · Cited by 234
(2009) · PubMed · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- Paineau, D., Carcano, D., Leyer, G., Darquy, S., Alyanakian, M.-A., Simoneau, G., Bergmann, J.-F., Brassart, D., Bornet, F., & Ouwehand, A. C.
- Venue
- FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 107-113
- ISSN
- 0928-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-695X
- OpenAlex
- W2122975235
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of seven potential probiotic strains on specific immune responses in healthy adults: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-695x.2008.00413.x
- The paper
- Paineau, D., Carcano, D., Leyer, G., Darquy, S., Alyanakian, M.-A., Simoneau, G., Bergmann, J.-F., Brassart, D., Bornet, F., & Ouwehand, A. C. (2008). Effects of seven potential probiotic strains on specific immune responses in healthy adults: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695x.2008.00413.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.