Cited by 1,789Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFractal and DNA sequence analysisAlgorithms and Data Compression

BLAST 2 Sequences, a new tool for comparing protein and nucleotide sequences

Tatusova, Tatiana A, Madden, Thomas L·1999·FEMS Microbiology Letters

Abstract

'BLAST 2 Sequences', a new BLAST-based tool for aligning two protein or nucleotide sequences, is described. While the standard BLAST program is widely used to search for homologous sequences in nucleotide and protein databases, one often needs to compare only two sequences that are already known to be homologous, coming from related species or, e.g. different isolates of the same virus. In such cases searching the entire database would be unnecessarily time-consuming. 'BLAST 2 Sequences' utilizes the BLAST algorithm for pairwise DNA-DNA or protein-protein sequence comparison. A World Wide Web version of the program can be used interactively at the NCBI WWW site (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gorf/bl2.++ +html). The resulting alignments are presented in both graphical and text form. The variants of the program for PC (Windows), Mac and several UNIX-based platforms can be downloaded from the NCBI FTP site (ftp://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13575.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BLAST is a widely-used algorithm for comparing an inquiry sequence against a database or reference sequence.

    “The aasic local alignment search tool (BLAST) is a widely-used algorithm for comparing an inquiry sequence against a database or reference sequence [34].”
  • BLAST employs hashing to rapidly find regions of local similarity, facilitating analyses from gene identification to comparative genomics.

    “BLAST employs hashing to rapidly find regions of local similarity, facilitating a broad range of analyses from gene identification to comparative genomics;”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tatusova, T. A., & Madden, T. L.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Tatusova, Tatiana A
Venue
FEMS Microbiology Letters
Published
1999-05
Volume
174
Issue
2
Pages
247-250
ISSN
  • 0378-1097 (ISSN-L)
  • 1574-6968
OpenAlex
W2072603644
Cited by
1,789
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 48
FWCI
25.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • FEMS Microbiology Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Algorithms and Data Compression
Keywords
pairwise sequence alignment, homologous sequences, NCBI BLAST
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Amino Acid Sequence, Base Sequence, Software, Sequence Alignment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review