Molecular archeology of L1 insertions in the human genome
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: As the rough draft of the human genome sequence nears a finished product and other genome-sequencing projects accumulate sequence data exponentially, bioinformatics is emerging as an important tool for studies of transposon biology. In particular, L1 elements exhibit a variety of sequence structures after insertion into the human genome that are amenable to computational analysis. We carried out a detailed analysis of the anatomy and distribution of L1 elements in the human genome using a new computer program, TSDfinder, designed to identify transposon boundaries precisely. RESULTS: Structural variants of L1 elements shared similar trends in the length and quality of their target site duplications (TSDs) and poly(A) tails. Furthermore, we found no correlation between the composition and genomic location of the pre-insertion locus and the resulting anatomy of the L1 insertion. We verified that L1 insertions with TSDs have the 5'-TTAAAA-3' cleavage site associated with L1 endonuclease activity. In addition, the second target DNA cut required for L1 insertion weakly matches the consensus pattern TTAAAA. On the other hand, the L1-internal breakpoints of deleted and inverted L1 elements do not resemble L1 endonuclease cleavage sites. Finally, the genome sequence data indicate that whereas singly inverted elements are common, doubly inverted elements are almost never found. CONCLUSIONS: The sequence data give no indication that the creation of L1 structural variants depends on characteristics of the insertion locus. In addition, the formation of 5' truncated and 5' inverted L1s are probably not due to the action of the L1 endonuclease.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The vast majority of L1s in the human genome are 5′ truncated; average L1 length is approximately 900 bp and 90-95% of all L1s are 5′ truncated.
“As the vast majority of L1s in the human genome are 5′ truncated (average L1 length is approximately 900bp, 90-95% of all L1s are 5′trunctated), this analysis was unsurprisingly skewed towards the 3′ end of L1s.”
From SIRT6 represses LINE1 retrotransposons by ribosylating KAP1 but this repression fails with stress and age (2014) · cites this paper as [53]
The Results section, “Characteristics of 5′ truncated L1 elements” (page not provided), says most human L1s are 5′ truncated and only 5% of the study’s 3′-intact L1s were full-length. That supports roughly 95% truncation for that subset, not explicitly for all L1s. The copy does not support an average length of approximately 900 bp; “Gene neighborhood of L1 insertions” instead reports a 1,614-nucleotide mean for the TSD-containing set. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The BLASTX program [45] was used to translate our set of full-length L1 DNA sequences in all three reading frames and compare them to the L1.”
MethodInitial sequencing and analysis of the human genome
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium, Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, C. F. G. R., Lander, E. S., Linton, L. M., Birren, B., Nusbaum, C., Zody, M. C., Baldwin, J., Devon, K., Dewar, K., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35057062 · Cited by 24,216 · see citing works
The sequence of the human genome
Venter, J. C., Adams, M. D., Myers, E. W., Li, P. W., Mural, R. J., Sutton, G. G., Smith, H. O., Yandell, M., Evans, C. A., Holt, R. A., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1058040 · Cited by 13,909 · see citing works
The Sequence of the Human Genome
Venter, J., Adams, M., Myers, E., Li, P. W., Mural, R., Sutton, G., Smith, H., Yandell, M., Evans, C., Holt, R., et al. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2014.237016 · Cited by 6,779 · see citing works
Sequence logos: a new way to display consensus sequences
Schneider, T. D., & Stephens, R. M. (1990) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/18.20.6097 · Cited by 3,354 · cited 1× · see citing works
“DNA sequence logos [59] of TSDs were generated using binary code downloaded from the site [60].”
MethodBLAST 2 Sequences, a new tool for comparing protein and nucleotide sequences
Tatusova, T. A., & Madden, T. L. (1999) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13575.x · Cited by 1,789 · see citing works
Luan, D. D., Korman, M. H., Jakubczak, J. L., & Eickbush, T. H. (1993) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90078-5 · Cited by 1,173 · cited 2× · see citing works
“L1 poly(A) tails During the process of TPRT, whereby a copy of an L1 is inserted into the genome, reverse transcription is believed to be primed on the poly(A) tail of the L1 transcript [12,14,17,27].”
BackgroundHuman L1 retrotransposon encodes a conserved endonuclease required for retrotransposition
Feng, Q., Moran, J. V., Kazazian, H. H., & Boeke, J. D. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81997-2 · Cited by 1,139 · cited 7× · see citing works
“The functional significance of ORF1 is not clear, whereas ORF2 contains three domains critical for L1 propagation: endonuclease [12], reverse transcriptase [7,13], and a 3 ́-terminal Zn finger-like domain [14].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationHigh frequency retrotransposition in cultured mammalian cells
Moran, J. V., Holmes, S. E., Naas, T. P., DeBerardinis, R. J., Boeke, J. D., & Kazazian, H. H. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81998-4 · Cited by 1,022 · cited 10× · see citing works
“The functional significance of ORF1 is not clear, whereas ORF2 contains three domains critical for L1 propagation: endonuclease [12], reverse transcriptase [7,13], and a 3 ́-terminal Zn finger-like domain [14].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationFour Evolutionary Strata on the Human X Chromosome
Lahn, B. T., & Page, D. C. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5441.964 · Cited by 1,001 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Furthermore, the concentration of L1s with TSDs on the p arm of the X chromosome is lower than that on the q arm (Figure 8). Lahn and Page [ 52 ] have hypothesized that the distal p arm is the site of the youngest evolutionary strata on the X chromosome, indicating that the X and Y chromosomes actively recombined at t…”
BackgroundInterspersed repeats and other mementos of transposable elements in mammalian genomes
Smit, A. F. (1999) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/s0959-437x(99)00031-3 · Cited by 949 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This modest majority may reflect a weak selection against L1s in the same orientation; such insertions could result in premature truncation of a gene’s mRNA due to the L1 polyadenylation signal [27,48,49].”
BackgroundHuman LINE retrotransposons generate processed pseudogenes
Esnault, C., Maestre, J., & Heidmann, T. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/74184 · Cited by 835 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Also, L1-encoded proteins were almost certainly involved in the insertion of most of the Alu elements and processed pseudogenes in the genome [6-10]; thus, L1s are probably responsible, directly or indirectly, for the genesis of most of the transposed fraction of human DNA.”
BackgroundReverse Transcriptase Encoded by a Human Transposable Element
Mathias, S. L., Scott, A. F., Kazazian, H. H., Boeke, J. D., & Gabriel, A. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1722352 · Cited by 774 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The functional significance of ORF1 is not clear, whereas ORF2 contains three domains critical for L1 propagation: endonuclease [12], reverse transcriptase [7,13], and a 3 ́-terminal Zn finger-like domain [14].”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe origin of interspersed repeats in the human genome
Smit, A. F. A. (1996) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/s0959-437x(96)80030-x · Cited by 611 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Nevertheless, this large fraction is a testament to the efficiency with which these elements, now mostly fossil sequences [2-5], have been able to propagate, and it is clear that they played a large part in determining the structure”
BackgroundSequence patterns indicate an enzymatic involvement in integration of mammalian retroposons
Jurka, J. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.5.1872 · Cited by 560 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This quality is consistent with previous computational [6] and biochemical [12,34] observations of A-rich target sequences of L1s and Alu sequences.”
BackgroundResultThe impact of L1 retrotransposons on the human genome
Kazazian, H. H., & Moran, J. V. (1998) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0598-19 · Cited by 520 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Several instances of disease have been attributed to the disruption of genes by an L1 insertion (for a review see [ 42 ]).”
BackgroundHuman L1 Retrotransposition Is Associated with Genetic Instability In Vivo
Symer, D. E., Connelly, C. J., Szak, S. T., Caputo, E. M., Cost, G. J., Parmigiani, G., & Boeke, J. D. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00839-5 · Cited by 479 · see citing works
Self-citationMany human L1 elements are capable of retrotransposition
Sassaman, D. M., Dombroski, B. A., Moran, J. V., Kimberland, M. L., Naas, T., DeBerardinis, R. J., Gabriel, A., Swergold, G. D., & Kazazian, H. H. (1997) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0597-37 · Cited by 452 · cited 3× · see citing works
“It is estimated that 30-60 full-length active L1s reside in the average human genome [ 37 ].”
BackgroundInfluentialIsolation of an Active Human Transposable Element
Dombroski, B. A., Mathias, S. L., Nanthakumar, E. J., Scott, A. F., & Kazazian, H. H. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1662412 · Cited by 443 · cited 2× · see citing works
“A full-length, active human L1 is approximately 6,000 nucleotides long and consists of a 5 ́ UTR with an internal promoter, two open reading frames (ORFs) separated by a 63-nucleotide intergenic region, and a 3 ́ UTR terminating in a poly(A) tail [11] (Figure 1a).”
BackgroundIdentification, Characterization, and Cell Specificity of a Human LINE-1 Promoter
Swergold, G. D. (1990) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.10.12.6718 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
Bailey, J. A., Carrel, L., Chakravarti, A., & Eichler, E. E. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.12.6634 · Cited by 431 · cited 3× · see citing works
“It has been suggested that the high concentration of L1s on the X chromosome may have a role in X inactivation of select genes [39].”
BackgroundResultAncestral, Mammalian-wide Subfamilies of LINE-1 Repetitive Sequences
Smit, A. F. A., Tóth, G. J., Riggs, A. D., & Jurka, J. (1995) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1994.0095 · Cited by 384 · cited 6× · see citing works
“The most variable features of L1s are the poly(A) tail, which has a variable length and can contain simple repeats, the polyadenylation signal, and the 3 ́ UTR, but many changes have also been reported in the coding regions of young L1s, especially in a segment of ORF1 [21-24].”
BackgroundInfluentialA first-generation X-inactivation profile of the human X chromosome
Carrel, L., Cottle, A. A., Goglin, K. C., & Willard, H. F. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.25.14440 · Cited by 358 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(NAD+) gamma, biglycan, tafazzin, deoxyribonuclease I-like 1, and emerin [51].”
Origin of the human L1 elements: Proposed progenitor genes deduced from a consensus DNA sequence
Scott, A. F., Schmeckpeper, B. J., Abdelrazik, M., Comey, C., O’Hara, B. F., Rossiter, J. P., Cooley, T., Heath, P. J., Smith, K. D., & Margolet, L. (1987) · Genomics · doi:10.1016/0888-7543(87)90003-6 · Cited by 313 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Characteristics of 5 truncated L1 elements The majority of L1s in the human genome are significantly 5 truncated [25]; indeed, only 5% of the 3 intact L1s in our study were full-length (Table 1).”
BackgroundL1 (LINE-1) Retrotransposon Evolution and Amplification in Recent Human History
Boissinot, S., Chevret, P., & Furano, A. V. (2000) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026372 · Cited by 312 · cited 2× · see citing works
“L1.3 is one of the most active L1s in a cell-culture assay [37] and is a member of the human-specific Ta-1 subfamily of L1s which encompasses the vast majority of active, young L1 elements in the human genome [ 22 ].”
BackgroundFrequent Human Genomic DNA Transduction Driven by LINE-1 RetrotranspositionPreprint
Pickeral, O. K., Makałowski, W., Boguski, M. S., & Boeke, J. D. (2000) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.10.4.411 · Cited by 279 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Consequently, the 3 TSD of the resulting L1 insertion event can be located hundreds of nucleotides downstream of the L1 sequence itself [29,30].”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationBucheton, A., Paro, R., Sang, H. M., Pélisson, A., & Finnegan, D. (1984) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(84)90536-1 · Cited by 275 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The poly(A) tails found in I factors, a transposable element in Drosophila melanogaster similar to L1s, contain several copies of the simple repeat TAA instead of a traditional poly(A) tail [40,41].”
BackgroundTransduction of 3'-flanking sequences is common in L1 retrotransposition
Goodier, J. L. (2000) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/9.4.653 · Cited by 266 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Consequently, the 3 TSD of the resulting L1 insertion event can be located hundreds of nucleotides downstream of the L1 sequence itself [29,30].”
BackgroundResultLINEs and Alus — the polyA connection
Boeke, J. D. (1997) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0597-6 · Cited by 263 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Also, L1-encoded proteins were almost certainly involved in the insertion of most of the Alu elements and processed pseudogenes in the genome [6-10]; thus, L1s are probably responsible, directly or indirectly, for the genesis of most of the transposed fraction of human DNA.”
BackgroundSelf-citationTwin Priming: A Proposed Mechanism for the Creation of Inversions in L1 RetrotranspositionPreprint
Ostertag, E. M., & Kazazian, H. H. (2001) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.205701 · Cited by 255 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Instead, our findings support the recently proposed twin-priming model for inversion [47]; as we showed above, the 3 end topstrand cleavage product has a modest bias to be a ‘T’ nucleotide (Figure 3b) and we indeed see a modest preference for a complementary ‘A’ nucleotide at the corresponding position of the inversio…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialCost, G. J., & Boeke, J. D. (1998) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi981858s · Cited by 242 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This quality is consistent with previous computational [6] and biochemical [12,34] observations of A-rich target sequences of L1s and Alu sequences.”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationHolmes, S. E., Dombroski, B. A., Krebs, C. M., Boehm, C. D., & Kazazian, H. H. (1994) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0694-143 · Cited by 231 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Also, 3 transduction events associated with L1 insertions add an additional structural variation [27,28]; such elements are generated when the element’s transcript includes some downstream flanking sequences that become transduced, along with the L1 sequence, to a new genomic locus.”
BackgroundLINE-1: A mammalian transposable element
Fanning, T. G., & Singer, M. (1987) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Structure and Expression · doi:10.1016/0167-4781(87)90112-6 · Cited by 227 · cited 1× · see citing works
“A new L1 insertion is usually flanked by short direct repeats derived from the target DNA locus upon L1 integration [19]; these repeats are referred to as target site duplications (TSDs), and can range from just a few to more than 200 nucleotides in length [14].”
BackgroundAlu Repeats: A Source for the Genesis of Primate Microsatellites
Arcot, S. S., Wang, Z., Weber, J. L., Deininger, P. L., & Batzer, M. A. (1995) · Genomics · doi:10.1006/geno.1995.1224 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Narita, N., Nishio, H., Kitoh, Y., Ishikawa, Y., Ishikawa, Y., Minami, R., Nakamura, H., & Matsuo, M. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci116402 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Selection Against Deleterious LINE-1-Containing Loci in the Human Lineage
Boissinot, S., Entezam, A., & Furano, A. V. (2001) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003893 · Cited by 179 · cited 3× · see citing works
“This observation is consistent with previous reports that the density of L1s on the X chromosome is almost double that on the autosomes [1,38,39].”
BackgroundResultKimberland, M. L., Divoký, V., Prchal, J. T., Schwahn, U., Berger, W., & Kazazian, H. H. (1999) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/8.8.1557 · Cited by 173 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The progenitor elements of these insertions were always fulllength or near full-length L1s with intact ORFs that were active in retrotransposition assays [11,14,35-37].”
BackgroundMizrokhi, L. J., Georgieva, S. G., & Ilyin, Y. V. (1988) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(88)80013-8 · Cited by 169 · cited 1× · see citing works
“They propagate by being transcribed from an internal RNA polymerase II promoter [ 15 ,16], and then use their endonuclease and reverse transcriptase respectively to nick a target site and reverse transcribe L1 RNA, integrating the L1 into a new genomic locus [12,17,18]; this process is known as target-site-primed reve…”
Rapid amplification of a retrotransposon subfamily is evolving the mouse genome
DeBerardinis, R. J., Goodier, J. L., Ostertag, E. M., & Kazazian, H. H. (1998) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/3104 · Cited by 149 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Nevertheless, this large fraction is a testament to the efficiency with which these elements, now mostly fossil sequences [2-5], have been able to propagate, and it is clear that they played a large part in determining the structure”
BackgroundSequence analysis of a Kpnl family member near the 3′ end of human β-globin gene
Hattori, M., Hidaka, S., & Sakaki, Y. (1985) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/13.21.7813 · Cited by 133 · cited 4× · see citing works
“An extra 131 nucleotides are found in the 5 UTR of some L1 elements, starting at nucleotide position 777 [26].”
BackgroundInfluentialRecently transposed Alu repeats result from multiple source genes
Matera, A. G., Hellmann‐Blumberg, U., Hintz, M. F., & Schmid, C. W. (1990) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/18.20.6019 · Cited by 132 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Nevertheless, this large fraction is a testament to the efficiency with which these elements, now mostly fossil sequences [2-5], have been able to propagate, and it is clear that they played a large part in determining the structure”
BackgroundGenomic Characterization of Recent Human LINE-1 Insertions: Evidence Supporting Random InsertionPreprint
Ovchinnikov, I. V., Troxel, A. B., & Swergold, G. D. (2001) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.194701 · Cited by 120 · cited 15× · see citing works
“The most variable features of L1s are the poly(A) tail, which has a variable length and can contain simple repeats, the polyadenylation signal, and the 3 ́ UTR, but many changes have also been reported in the coding regions of young L1s, especially in a segment of ORF1 [21-24].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAdaptive Evolution in LINE-1 Retrotransposons
Boissinot, S., & Furano, A. V. (2001) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003765 · Cited by 120 · cited 3× · see citing works
“The functional significance of ORF1 is not clear, whereas ORF2 contains three domains critical for L1 propagation: endonuclease [12], reverse transcriptase [7,13], and a 3´-terminal Zn finger-like domain [14].”
BackgroundDombroski, B. A., Scott, A. F., & Kazazian, H. H. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.14.6513 · Cited by 119 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The progenitor elements of these insertions were always fulllength or near full-length L1s with intact ORFs that were active in retrotransposition assays [11,14,35-37].”
BackgroundMinakami, R., Kurose, K., Etoh, K., Furuhata, Y., Hattori, M., & Sakaki, Y. (1992) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/20.12.3139 · Cited by 112 · cited 1× · see citing works
“3 reference sequence, ensuring the presence of an intact L1 internal promoter [16,43,44].”
BackgroundDombroski, B. A., Feng, Q., Mathias, S. L., Sassaman, D. M., Scott, A. F., Kazazian, H. H., & Boeke, J. D. (1994) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.14.7.4485 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Self-citationRetrotransposon R1Bm endonuclease cleaves the target sequence
Feng, Q., Schumann, G. G., & Boeke, J. D. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.5.2083 · Cited by 96 · cited 9× · see citing works
“There is evidence that the related sequence-specific R1 element endonuclease makes both cuts in the target DNA [18].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationDhellin, O., Maestre, J., & Heidmann, T. (1997) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/16.21.6590 · Cited by 76 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Also, L1-encoded proteins were almost certainly involved in the insertion of most of the Alu elements and processed pseudogenes in the genome [6-10]; thus, L1s are probably responsible, directly or indirectly, for the genesis of most of the transposed fraction of human DNA.”
BackgroundTarget DNA chromatinization modulates nicking by L1 endonuclease
Cost, G. J. (2001) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/29.2.573 · Cited by 74 · cited 1× · see citing works
“[6,8,53].”
LINE-1: a human transposable element
Singer, M., Krek, V., McMillan, J., Swergold, G. D., & Thayer, R. E. (1993) · Gene · doi:10.1016/0378-1119(93)90064-a · Cited by 71 · cited 1× · see citing works
“3 reference sequence, ensuring the presence of an intact L1 internal promoter [16,43,44].”
BackgroundClements, A. (1998) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/26.15.3528 · Cited by 59 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Finally, residues 472(G) and 474(D) in the conserved Z motif in ORF2 are required for reverse transcriptase activity [46].”
BackgroundMethodSubfamily structure and evolution of the human L1 family of repetive sequences
Jurka, J. (1989) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02602921 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Dombroski, B. A., Feng, Q., Mathias, S. L., Sassaman, D. M., Scott, A. F., Kazazian, H. H., & Boeke, J. D. (1994) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.14.7.4485-4492.1994 · Cited by 36 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The functional significance of ORF1 is not clear, whereas ORF2 contains three domains critical for L1 propagation: endonuclease [12], reverse transcriptase [7,13], and a 3 ́-terminal Zn finger-like domain [14].”
BackgroundSelf-citationChaboissier, M., Finnegan, D., & Bucheton, A. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.13.2467 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Eickbush, T. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.283.5407.1465 · Cited by 33 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This modest majority may reflect a weak selection against L1s in the same orientation; such insertions could result in premature truncation of a gene’s mRNA due to the L1 polyadenylation signal [27,48,49].”
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Symer DE Connelly C Szak ST Caputo EM Cost GJ Parmigiani G Boeke JD Human L1 retrotransposition is associated with genetic instability in vivo. Cell 2002 110 327 338 12176320
- Pickeral OK Baltimore MD Bioinformatics of human retrotransposons. PhD dissertation 2000 The Johns Hopkins University
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The impact of retrotransposons on human genome evolution
Cordaux, R., & Batzer, M. (2009) · Nature reviews genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2640 · Cited by 1,691 · see citing works
“Indeed, as a result of TPRT and decay over time, most L1 copies are inactivated by truncations, internal rearrangements and mutation”
Ten things you should know about transposable elements
Bourque, G., Burns, K. H., Gehring, M., Gorbunova, V., Seluanov, A., Hammell, M., Imbeault, M., Izsvák, Z., Levin, H. L., Macfarlan, T. S., et al. (2018) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1577-z · Cited by 1,430 · see citing works
Roles for retrotransposon insertions in human disease
Hancks, D. C., & Kazazian, H. H. (2016) · Mobile DNA · doi:10.1186/s13100-016-0065-9 · Cited by 670 · see citing works
“Most LINE-1 s in the human genome are grossly truncated at their 5′-end [6, 36, 37].”
BackgroundInfluentialActive human retrotransposons: variation and disease
Hancks, D. C., & Kazazian, H. H. (2012) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2012.02.006 · Cited by 592 · see citing works
Human L1 element target‐primed reverse transcription in vitro
Cost, G. J., Feng, Q., Jacquier, A., & Boeke, J. D. (2002) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/cdf592 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
Self-citationTranscriptional disruption by the L1 retrotransposon and implications for mammalian transcriptomes
Han, J. S., Szak, S. T., & Boeke, J. D. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02536 · Cited by 484 · see citing works
“This explains, at least in part, the distribution of predominantly non-functional, 5′ truncated L1s in the genom”
BackgroundSelf-citationHuman L1 Retrotransposition Is Associated with Genetic Instability In Vivo
Symer, D. E., Connelly, C. J., Szak, S. T., Caputo, E. M., Cost, G. J., Parmigiani, G., & Boeke, J. D. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00839-5 · Cited by 479 · see citing works
Self-citationMobile elements and mammalian genome evolution
Deininger, P. L., Moran, J. V., Batzer, M. A., & Kazazian, H. H. (2003) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2003.10.013 · Cited by 479 · see citing works
“Although the relatively high incidence of these unusual rearrangements may reflect the cellular milieu of the transformed cells used for these studies, molecular and bioinformatic studies have identified rare deletion events associated with L1 and Alu insertions in humans [35–38].”
BackgroundThe complete sequence of a human Y chromosome
Rhie, A., Nurk, S., Cechova, M., Hoyt, S. J., Taylor, D. J., Altemose, N., Hook, P. W., Koren, S., Rautiainen, M., Alexandrov, I. A., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06457-y · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Intragenic DNA methylation alters chromatin structure and elongation efficiency in mammalian cells
Lorincz, M. C., Dickerson, D. R., Schmitt, M., & Groudine, M. T. (2004) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb840 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Van Meter, M., Kashyap, M., Rezazadeh, S., Geneva, A. J., Morello, T. D., Seluanov, A., & Gorbunova, V. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6011 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
“Multiple reports have described the ratio of human L1s that are truncated, we used these reports as the basis for adjusting raw read depth to normalized read depth 53,54 .”
The Mobile Element Locator Tool (MELT): population-scale mobile element discovery and biologyPreprint
Gardner, E. J., Lam, V. K. L., Harris, D., Chuang, N. T., Scott, E., Pittard, W. S., Mills, R. E., & Devine, S. E. (2017) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.218032.116 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
“5A,B; Szak et al. 2002).”
Pace, J. K., & Feschotte, C. (2007) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.5826307 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
“…the evolutionary history and genomic impact of mammalian retrotransposons has been the subject of intensive investigation (for examples, see Smit et al. 1995; Kapitonov and Jurka 1996; Szak et al. 2002; Xing et al. 2003; Price et al. 2004; Khan et al. 2006; for review, see Deininger et al. 2003).”
BackgroundA Human Genome Structural Variation Sequencing Resource Reveals Insights into Mutational Mechanisms
Kidd, J. M., Graves, T., Newman, T. L., Fulton, R. S., Hayden, H. S., Malig, M., Kallicki, J., Kaul, R., Wilson, R. K., & Eichler, E. E. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.10.027 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Yegnasubramanian, S., Haffner, M. C., Zhang, Y., Gürel, B., Cornish, T. C., Wu, Z. J., Irizarry, R. A., Morgan, J., Hicks, J. L., DeWeese, T. L., et al. (2008) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-6088 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
“The vast majority of LINE1 elements, however, are truncated or highly degenerate, lack the promoter sequence, and are not capable of active retrotransposition (26, 36 ).”
BackgroundDiscovering and detecting transposable elements in genome sequences
Bergman, C., & Quesneville, H. (2007) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbm048 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
“For example, TSDs can be used to refine the precise location of TEs, as is implemeted in TSDfinder [75] or SINEDR [76].”
MethodEndogenous retroviral promoter exaptation in human cancer
Babaian, A., & Mager, D. L. (2016) · Mobile DNA · doi:10.1186/s13100-016-0080-x · Cited by 246 · see citing works
“Only ~3500-7000 are full length, retaining their promoters and hence, the potential ability to lend these promoters to nearby genes [71, 72].”
BackgroundRed: an intelligent, rapid, accurate tool for detecting repeats de-novo on the genomic scale
Girgis, H. Z. (2015) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-015-0654-5 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
“A signature-based tool searches a sequence for features comprising the signature of the class of interest [21–24].”
MethodSomatic retrotransposition in human cancer revealed by whole-genome and exome sequencing
Helman, E., Lawrence, M. S., Stewart, C., Sougnez, C., Getz, G., & Meyerson, M. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.163659.113 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
“Known as 39- transduction, this process is thought to result from the read- through of the weak L1 poly(A) signal and is estimated to occur in 15%–23% of all genomic L1s (Holmes et al. 1994; Moran et al. 1999; Goodier et al. 2000; Pickeral et al. 2000; Szak et al. 2002 ).”
BackgroundThe non-autonomous retrotransposon SVA is trans -mobilized by the human LINE-1 protein machinery
Raiz, J., Damert, A., Chira, S., Held, U., Jung‐Klawitter, S., Hamdorf, M., Löwer, J., Strätling, W. H., Löwer, R., & Schumann, G. G. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr863 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
“We found variable TSDs of 8–19 bp in length which correspond well to the TSD lengths of preexisting genomic L1 insertions ranging from 9 to 27 bp (15).”
BackgroundChen, J., Stenson, P. D., Cooper, D. N., & Férec, C. (2005) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00439-005-1321-0 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
“2 in Szak et al. 2002).”
BackgroundInfluentialLerat, E. (2009) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2009.165 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
“Programs for detecting non-LTR retrotransposons The programs TSDFINDER (Szak et al., 2002), SINEDR (Tu et al., 2004) and RTANALYZER (Lucier et al., 2007) have been designed to detect non-LTR retrotransposons.”
BackgroundProgress in understanding the biology of the human mutagen LINE-1
Babushok, D. V., & Kazazian, H. H. (2007) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.20486 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
“Analyses of endogenous L1s in the human genome [Jurka, 1997; Lander et al., 2001; Szak et al., 2002] further confirmed that L1 integrants carry characteristic features of TPRT integration: L1 sequences generally integrate at 50 TTTT0AA 30 sites, contain an intact 30 end region ending in a polyA,…”
BackgroundLINE-1 retrotransposons: Modulators of quantity and quality of mammalian gene expression?
Han, J. S., & Boeke, J. D. (2005) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.20257 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
“However, protein-coding sequences are a small target (only 1% of the genome((3))) and thus most new L1 integrations are in introns or intergenic regions.((7)) The consequences of these L1 insertions on gene function have not been thoroughly studied.”
BackgroundSelf-citationSVA retrotransposons: Evolution and genetic instability
Hancks, D. C., & Kazazian, H. H. (2010) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2010.04.001 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Retrotransposition of marked SVA elements by human L1s in cultured cells
Hancks, D. C., Goodier, J. L., Mandal, P. K., Cheung, L. E., & Kazazian, H. H. (2011) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddr245 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
“5 (full-length) AGAAAAATCTTTTCTT (16) TTCT/g 60 4 SVA.”
A mobile threat to genome stability: The impact of non-LTR retrotransposons upon the human genome
Konkel, M. K., & Batzer, M. A. (2010) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2010.03.001 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
“The insertion is 3′ intact (contains a polyA-tail) and is flanked by TSDs.”
BackgroundInfluential“One code to find them all”: a perl tool to conveniently parse RepeatMasker output files
Bailly‐Bechet, M., Haudry, A., & Lerat, E. (2014) · Mobile DNA · doi:10.1186/1759-8753-5-13 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
“TSDFINDER was developed to refine the coordinates of long interspersed nuclear element (LINE) L1 insertions by identifying flanking target site duplication (TSD) sequences and the poly(A) tails of 3′ intact L1 insertions in the human genome [21].”
Philippe, C., Vargas-Landín, D. B., Doucet, A. J., van Essen, D., Vera‐Otarola, J., Kuciak, M., Corbin, A., Nigumann, P., & Cristofari, G. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.13926 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
“Consistent with previous observations (Szak et al., 2002), genic L1 copies are more often found in the antisense orientation (Figure 4—figure supplement 3a).”
Resolving rates of mutation in the brain using single-neuron genomics
Evrony, G. D., Lee, E., Park, P. J., & Walsh, C. A. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.12966 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Mammalian Small Nucleolar RNAs Are Mobile Genetic Elements
Weber, M. J. (2006) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020205 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
“Similar compositions were reported for human L1 polyA tails [35].”
Sultana, T., van Essen, D., Siol, O., Bailly-Bechet, M., Philippe, C., Zine El Aabidine, A., Pioger, L., Nigumann, P., Saccani, S., Andrau, J.-C., et al. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.02.036 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Genomic rearrangements by LINE-1 insertion-mediated deletion in the human and chimpanzee lineages
Han, K. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki718 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
“As to chromosomal distribution, the majority of the L1IMDs were located on chromosomes 1–12, which probably relates to both the larger size of these chromosomes and their higher density of truncated (30 intact) L1 insertions (19).”
InfluentialGamma radiation increases endonuclease-dependent L1 retrotransposition in a cultured cell assay
Farkash, E. A. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkj522 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
“insertions lack these features and may instead contain large deletions, cDNA transduction or 30 element truncation (13,14,24).”
BackgroundTransposable element detection from whole genome sequence data
Ewing, A. D. (2015) · Mobile DNA · doi:10.1186/s13100-015-0055-3 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
“Some software tools have been developed specifically to detect TSDs [28, 29].”
TEMP: a computational method for analyzing transposable element polymorphism in populations
Zhuang, J., Wang, J., Theurkauf, W. E., & Weng, Z. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku323 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
“LINE elements had much longer TSDs and much broader TSD distributions compared with other retrotransposon super-families (Figure 4a), which is consistent with previous findings about the L1 element in the human genome (35,36).”
ResultLee, J. Y., Ji, Z., & Tian, B. (2008) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn540 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
“This bias is in good agreement with previous reports that indicated preferential placement of L1 sequences in antisense orientation of host genes with a ratio of 2 (52).”
ResultHan, J. S. (2010) · Mobile DNA · doi:10.1186/1759-8753-1-15 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
“Although Figure 1 shows full-length elements, nonLTR retrotransposons in genomes are often 5' truncated due to incomplete reverse transcription [35].”
BackgroundActive retrotransposition by a synthetic L1 element in mice
An, W., Han, J. S., Wheelan, S. J., Davis, E. S., Coombes, C. E., Ye, P., Triplett, C., & Boeke, J. D. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0605300103 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Self-citation5′-Transducing SVA retrotransposon groups spread efficiently throughout the human genomePreprint
Damert, A., Raiz, J., Horn, A. V., Löwer, J., Wang, H., Xing, J., Batzer, M. A., Löwer, R., & Schumann, G. G. (2009) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.093435.109 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
“…(one exception, 42 bp), a variable-length poly(A) tail of 2–72 nucleotides following putative polyadenylation signals, and a consensus target sequence AA[TTTT. Poly(A) tails were composed of patterned repeats (Szak et al. 2002) in 60 cases, while homogenous poly(A) tails were found in 56 elements.”
Heritable L1 retrotransposition in the mouse primordial germline and early embryoPreprint
Richardson, S. R., Gerdes, P., Gerhardt, D. J., Sanchez-Luque, F. J., Bodea, G. O., Muñoz-López, M., Jesuadian, J. S., Kempen, M.-J. H. C., Carreira, P. E., Jeddeloh, J. A., et al. (2017) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.219022.116 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
“sistent with a previously described preference of L1 for AT-rich regions (Supplemental Table 4; Szak et al. 2002; Boissinot et al. 2004; Gasior et al. 2007).”
BRCA1 and S phase DNA repair pathways restrict LINE-1 retrotransposition in human cells
Mita, P., Sun, X., Fenyö, D., Kahler, D. J., Li, D., Agmon, N., Wudzinska, A., Keegan, S., Bader, J. S., Yun, C., et al. (2020) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-020-0374-z · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citationZingler, N., Willhoeft, U., Brose, H.-P., Schoder, V., Jahns, T., Hanschmann, K.-M. O., Morrish, T. A., Löwer, J., & Schumann, G. G. (2005) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.3421505 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
“Only 15% of all intact L1 insertions flanked by target site duplications (TSDs) represent full-length insertions, 85% are 5 truncated, and 19% are both 5 -truncated and 5 -inverted (Szak et al. 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLINEs and SINEs of primate evolution
Konkel, M. K., Walker, J. A., & Batzer, M. A. (2010) · Evolutionary Anthropology Issues News and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.20283 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
L1Base: from functional annotation to prediction of active LINE-1 elements
Penzkofer, T. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki044 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Processed pseudogenes acquired somatically during cancer development
Cooke, S. L., Shlien, A., Marshall, J., Pipinikas, C., Martin, S., Tubío, J. M. C., Li, Y., Menzies, A. H., Mudie, L. J., Ramakrishna, M., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4644 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Mobster: accurate detection of mobile element insertions in next generation sequencing data
Thung, D. T., de Ligt, J., Vissers, L. E. L. M., Steehouwer, M., Kroon, M., de Vries, P., Slagboom, P. E., Ye, K., Veltman, J. A., & Hehir‐Kwa, J. Y. (2014) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0488-x · Cited by 102 · see citing works
“It has previously been observed that target site duplications and deletions tend to either be 15 nt or 9 nt in length [33], more specifically we observe that the majority of target site duplications are 14 nt in length, and target site deletions have a median of 7 nt (Figure 2B).”
BackgroundStribinskis, V., & Ramos, K. S. (2006) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-3478 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Characterization of L1 retrotransposition with high-throughput dual-luciferase assays
Xie, Y., Rosser, J. M., Thompson, T. L., Boeke, J. D., & An, W. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq1076 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
“Since the majority of L1 insertions are 50 truncated (25,26), the length of a reporter gene could potentially be a critical factor in determining the overall L1 activity that can be observed.”
BackgroundSelf-citationJones, R. B., Garrison, K. E., Wong, J. C., Duan, E. H., Nixon, D. F., & Ostrowski, M. A. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001547 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
L1 integration in a transgenic mouse modelPreprint
Babushok, D. V., Ostertag, E. M., Courtney, C., Choi, J. M., & Kazazian, H. H. (2005) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.4571606 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
“2005), and for genomic L1s and Alus (Jurka 1997; Myers et al. 2002; Szak et al. 2002).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialKojima, K. K. (2003) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msg235 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
“Evolutionary dynamics in a novel L2 clade of non-LTR retrotransposons in Deuterostomia.”
BackgroundTsirigos, A., & Rigoutsos, I. (2009) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000610 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
“In summary, we conclude that Alu elements share little in common in terms of functional biases with either older or younger mobile elements, and we can therefore rule out the tolerance and preferential insertion hypotheses, a conclusion that is in fact consistent with previous findings [23,24].”
ResultSen, S. K., Huang, C. T., Han, K., & Batzer, M. A. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm317 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
“Specifically, the loci included in this analysis after experimental confirmation of the computational output possessed all four of the following characteristics: 30 truncation beyond 25 bp (i.e., 5 bp more than the minimum truncation level set during computational screening) relative to the L1HS_30end consensus from t…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialFiston-Lavier, A.-S., Barrón, M. G., Petrov, D. A., & González, J. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku1250 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Chen, J., Rattner, A., & Nathans, J. (2006) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddl138 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
A matter of life or death: How microsatellites emerge in and vanish from the human genomePreprint
Kelkar, Y., Eckert, K. A., Chiaromonte, F., & Makova, K. D. (2011) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.122937.111 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
“They frequently give birth to microsatellites upon and after their integration; however, unlike Alus, L1s do so evenly throughout their length, potentially because their whole sequence [and not just their 39-poly(A) tails (Boeke 1997)] is AT-rich (Szak et al. 2002).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Specificity and Flexibility of L1 Reverse Transcription Priming at Imperfect T-Tracts
Monot, C., Kuciak, M., Viollet, S., Mir, A. A., Gabus, C., Darlix, J., & Cristofari, G. (2013) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003499 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
“Other studies have previously reported that T-richness extends beyond four nucleotides upstream of the cleavage site [48,50].”
BackgroundDifferent evolutionary fates of recently integrated human and chimpanzee LINE-1 retrotransposons
Lee, J., Cordaux, R., Han, K., Wang, J., Hedges, D. J., Liang, P., & Batzer, M. A. (2006) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2006.08.029 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
“Because L1 elements are often truncated or rearranged (Smit et al., 1995; Szak et al., 2002), we based our analyses of L1 subfamily diversity and relationships on 864 bp-long sequences encompassing the last 665 bp of ORF2 and the entire 3′ UTR, to maximize the number of elements included in the analyses.”
LINE-1 Retrotransposable Element DNA Accumulates in HIV-1-Infected Cells
Jones, R. B., Song, H., Xu, Y., Garrison, K. E., Buzdin, A. A., Anwar, N. M., Hunter, D. V., Mujib, S., Mihajlovic, V., Martin, E., et al. (2013) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.02257-13 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Repetitive sequence environment distinguishes housekeeping genes
Eller, C. D., Regelson, M., Merriman, B., Nelson, S. F., Horvath, S., & Marahrens, Y. (2006) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2006.09.018 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
The Unusual Phylogenetic Distribution of Retrotransposons: A HypothesisPreprint
Boeke, J. D. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1392003 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citationThe structures of mouse and human L1 elements reflect their insertion mechanism
Martin, S. L., Li, W.-L. P., Furano, A. V., & Boissinot, S. (2005) · Cytogenetic and Genome Research · doi:10.1159/000084956 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
“In fact, the majority of genomic L1s are 5) truncated while the 3) ends remain relatively constant (Hutchison et al., 1989; Boissinot et al., 2001; Szak et al., 2002).”
BackgroundWolf, Z. T., Leslie, E. J., Arzi, B., Jayashankar, K., Karmi, N., Jia, Z., Rowland, D. J., Young, A. E., Safra, N., Saundra, S., et al. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004257 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
“LINE elements are transposable elements that comprise 21% of the human genome, 16% of the dog genome, and often insert into intronic regions [44,45].”
BackgroundA novel testis ubiquitin-binding protein gene arose by exon shuffling in hominoidsPreprint
Babushok, D. V., Ohshima, K., Ostertag, E. M., Chen, X., Wang, Y., Mandal, P. K., Okada, N., Abrams, C. S., & Kazazian, H. H. (2007) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.6252107 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Bioinformatics and genomic analysis of transposable elements in eukaryotic genomes
Janicki, M., Rooke, R., & Yang, G. (2011) · Chromosome Research · doi:10.1007/s10577-011-9230-7 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“With increased interest in TEs themselves, computational tools expanded in their scope, Table 1 Updated bioinformatics tools and databases since those summarized in Lerat (2009) Category Approach used Application name Defining characteristics References TE discovery programs Library-based approaches TransposonPSI Uses…”
MethodMechanisms of intron gain and loss in Drosophila
Yenerall, P. M., Krupa, B., & Zhou, L. (2011) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-364 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
“However, reverse transcriptase may not always reach the 5’ end of mRNA [46].”
BackgroundTransposable elements and G-quadruplexes
Kejnovský, E., Tokan, V., & Lexa, M. (2015) · Chromosome Research · doi:10.1007/s10577-015-9491-7 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
“In LINEs, target-primed reverse transcription (TPRT) is an inefficient process which often terminates before copying the entire element, leading to fragments truncated at their 5′ end (Szak et al. 2002; Han 2010).”
Guardian of the Human Genome: Host Defense Mechanisms against LINE-1 Retrotransposition
Ariumi, Y. (2016) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2016.00028 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“In contrast, the E6 protein from β-human papillomavirus (β-HPV 5 and 8) reduces ATM protein levels and attenuates L1 retrotransposition, suggesting that ATM is needed for efficient L1 retrotransposition (Wallace et al., 2013).”
BackgroundThe Role of Transposable Elements of the Human Genome in Neuronal Function and Pathology
Chesnokova, E., Beletskiy, A., & Kolosov, P. M. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23105847 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Transposon insertion site profiling chip (TIP-chip)
Wheelan, S. J., Scheifele, L. Z., Martínez-Murillo, F., Irizarry, R. A., & Boeke, J. D. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0605450103 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationLi, J., Kannan, M., Trivett, A. L., Liao, H., Wu, X., Akagi, K., & Symer, D. E. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku091 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“As a majority of full-length intragenic human L1s are oriented AS to flanking genes’ ORFs (23,24), resulting AS L1 RIFTs frequently include downstream spliced exons expressed in the canonical sense orientation.”
BackgroundLuca, C. D., Guadagni, F., Vallebona, P. S., Sentinelli, S., Gallucci, M., Hoffmann, A., Schumann, G. G., Spadafora, C., & Sciamanna, I. (2015) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.6767 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“Only 80–100 human L1 copies are fulllength and retrotransposition-competent [3], whereas the majority of L1 insertions is truncated at their 5′ end and thus not mobile [4].”
BackgroundStructural mechanism of LINE-1 target-primed reverse transcription
Ghanim, G. E., Hu, H., Boulanger, J., & Nguyen, T. H. D. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ads8412 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“The spacing observed in our assay is within the reported lengths of in vivo LINE-1 TSD events (23, 24).”
Identifying related L1 retrotransposons by analyzing 3' transduced sequences
Szak, S. T., Pickeral, O. K., Landsman, D., & Boeke, J. D. (2003) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2003-4-5-r30 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“The TSDfinder program [23,37,38] was run on the RepeatMasker *.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationAn alternative pathway for Alu retrotransposition suggests a role in DNA double-strand break repair
Srikanta, D., Sen, S. K., Huang, C. T., Conlin, E. M., Rhodes, R. M., & Batzer, M. A. (2008) · Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2008.09.016 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“These rates are much lower than those for TPRT-mediated insertions which encompass the vast majority of Alu insertions in primates [47].”
BackgroundLINE-1 preTa Elements in the Human Genome
Salem, A. H., Myers, J. S., Otieno, A. C., Watkins, W. S., Jorde, L. B., & Batzer, M. A. (2003) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00032-9 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“A similar insertion site preference was observed for 2 kb sequence blocks as well as for the previously reported L1 Ta subfamily(24) and other L1 subfamilies.(38) In addition, we also analyzed preTa L1 elements inserted in repetitive sequences and Table 1.”
ResultProcessed pseudogenes: A substrate for evolutionary innovation
Troskie, R., Faulkner, G. J., & Cheetham, S. W. (2021) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.202100186 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Determinants for DNA target structure selectivity of the human LINE-1 retrotransposon endonuclease
Repanas, K., Zingler, N., Layer, L. E., Schumann, G. G., Anastassis Perrakis, A., & Weichenrieder, O. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm516 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
An expanding universe of the non-coding genome in cancer biology
Xue, B., & He, L. (2014) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgu099 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“The signatures of this L1 integration include 5′ truncation, shortening of oligo(dA) at the 3′ end, and target site duplications of 7–20 base pairs in length (48).”
BackgroundShephard, E. A., Chandan, P., Stevanovic-Walker, M., Edwards, M., & Phillips, I. R. (2007) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20070523 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Retroposed Copies of the HMG Genes: A Window to Genome DynamicsPreprint
Strichman-Almashanu, L. Z., Bustin, M., & Landsman, D. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.893803 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“Each mRNA/EST hit of 99% identity, EST match length of 300 bp, was then compared using BLAST2SEQ to the corresponding HMG mRNA and considered as evidence for RPC expression only if it was 97% identical to the HMG mRNA and therefore was not likely to be its transcript.”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationMobility Pathways for Vertebrate L1, L2, CR1, and RTE Clade Retrotransposons
Ichiyanagi, K., & Okada, N. (2008) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msn061 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“The lengths of the TSDs flanking the genomic copies of L1PAs (Szak et al. 2002), BovB (Nijman et al. 2002), and RTE_Mdo (Gentles et al. 2007) were analyzed previously; however, these analyses did not include TSDs of 10 bp because the short direct repeats identified could not be statistically…”
Machine learning reveals bilateral distribution of somatic L1 insertions in human neurons and glia
Zhu, X., Zhou, B., Pattni, R., Gleason, K., Tan, C., Kalinowski, A., Sloan, S. A., Fiston-Lavier, A.-S., Mariani, J., Petrov, D. A., et al. (2021) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-00767-4 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Automated paleontology of repetitive DNA with REANNOTATE
Pereira, V. (2008) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-9-614 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“In such a situation RepeatMasker may annotate multiple sequence similarity hits to the given TE family without establishing the common origin of these sequences [21–24], and no information on the temporal order of insertion of overlapping repetitive elements is obtained without human analysis.”
BackgroundCharacterization of pre-insertion loci of de novo L1 insertions
Gasior, S. L., Preston, G. J., Hedges, D. J., Gilbert, N., Moran, J. V., & Deininger, P. L. (2006) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2006.08.024 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“L1 and Alu are both nonsite-specific and demonstrate a strong bias for insertion into a short, A+T-rich L1 endonuclease target site, as has been demonstrated for genomic L1 and Alu insertions (Boissinot et al., 2000, 2004; Feng et al., 1996; Jurka, 1997; Jurka and Klonowski, 1996; Morrish et al., 2002; Myers et al., 2…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSantagostino, M., Khoriauli, L., Gamba, R., Bonuglia, M., Klipstein, O., Piras, F. M., Vella, F., Russo, A., Badiale, C., Mazzagatti, A., et al. (2015) · BMC Genetics · doi:10.1186/s12863-015-0281-1 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
LINE-1 Hypermethylation in Serum Cell-Free DNA of Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients
Dunaeva, M., Derksen, M., & Pruijn, G. J. M. (2017) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s12035-017-0679-z · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“Over 500,000 copies of LINE-1 are present in the human genome, of which the vast majority is 5′ truncated [11]; about 3,000copies are full length and 80–100 of these are active re t ro t ransposons [12] .”
BackgroundKojima, K. K. (2010) · Mobile DNA · doi:10.1186/1759-8753-1-17 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“Human L1 and Alu are usually flanked by ~15-bp TSDs [9,33,34].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGladyshev, E. A., & Arkhipova, I. R. (2009) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2009.08.016 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“Mammalian LINE-1 elements, which transpose by a similar mechanism, generate variable-sized TSDs, with lengths centering around 9 and 15 bp and never exceeding 60 bp in more than 16,000 analyzed L1 insertions in the human genome (Szak et al., 2002).”
BackgroundWen, X., Jeong, S., Kim, Y.-H., Bae, J. M., Cho, N., Kim, J. H., & Kang, G. H. (2017) · Clinical Epigenetics · doi:10.1186/s13148-016-0308-0 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“However, 85% of LINE-1 elements are truncated in their 5′ sequences [20], and thus, PCR-based assays only assess 15% of the LINE-1 elements in the human genome.”
Transposable Element Interactions Shape the Ecology of the Deer Mouse Genome
Gozashti, L., Feschotte, C., & Hoekstra, H. E. (2023) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msad069 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
“…species, and even on much smaller scales, could have a catastrophic effect on the evolutionary trajectory of L1s in a genome, especially given the poor success rates of the L1 retrotransposition mechanism in producing new fully functional L1 copies (Kazazian and Moran 1998; Szak et al. 2002).”
BackgroundNovel retrotransposon analysis reveals multiple mobility pathways dictated by hostsPreprint
Ichiyanagi, K., Nakajima, R., Kajikawa, M., & Okada, N. (2006) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.5542607 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“Thus, TSD enables us to determine the target-site boundaries of genomic L1 copies (Szak et al. 2002; Martin et al. 2005b; Zingler et al. 2005).”
BackgroundResultViollet, S., Monot, C., & Cristofari, G. (2014) · Mobile Genetic Elements · doi:10.4161/mge.28907 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
APE-type non-LTR retrotransposons: determinants involved in target site recognition
Zingler, N., Weichenrieder, O., & Schumann, G. G. (2005) · Cytogenetic and Genome Research · doi:10.1159/000084959 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“This experimental evidence has been corroborated by computer analyses of the sites of preexisting L1 and Alu element insertions in the human genome (Jurka, 1997; Szak et al., 2002).”
McLaughlin, R. N., Young, J. M., Yang, L., Neme, R., Wichman, H. A., & Malik, H. S. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004531 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“In various contexts, transposable elements have been shown to affect the expression of genes in their vicinity [58,59], and some elements are included in the untranslated regions of host mRNAs [60,61].”
BackgroundRusso, J., Harrington, A. W., & Steiniger, M. (2015) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.115.177196 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
An intronic LINE-1 regulates IFNAR1 expression in human immune cells
Buttler, C. A., Ramirez, D., Dowell, R. D., & Chuong, E. B. (2023) · Mobile DNA · doi:10.1186/s13100-023-00308-3 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“However, LINE retrotransposition is often truncated at the 5’ end [17].”
BackgroundRegulatory roles of LINE-1-encoded reverse transcriptase in cancer onset and progression
Sciamanna, I., Gualtieri, A., Piazza, P. V., & Spadafora, C. (2014) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.2504 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“In the case of LINE-1, however, only a minor fraction (about 80–100) of all copies present in the human genome are full-length and retrotranspositionally competent [4], whereas the vast majority of genomic LINE-1 copies are truncated at their 5’ end and thus non-mobile [5], yet still transcriptionally competent: this…”
BackgroundHeitkam, T., & Schmidt, T. (2009) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2009.03923.x · Cited by 27 · see citing works
- Authors
- Szak, S. T., Pickeral, O. K., Makalowski, W., Boguski, M. S., Landsman, D., & Boeke, J. D.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Human Genome Sciences (United States) (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Boeke, Jef D
- Venue
- Genome Biology
- Published
- 2002-09-19
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- research0052-research0052
- ISSN
- 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-760X
- PMC
- PMC134481
- OpenAlex
- W2139253234
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 12.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Genome biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (CA-16519, P01CA016519)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
- Keywords
- LINE-1 retrotransposons, human genome, transposon insertion, target site duplication, poly(A) tail, structural variants
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Humans, Poly A, Recombination, Genetic, Genome, Human, Mutagenesis, Insertional, Retroelements, Computational Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review