The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon catabolite repression in Pseudomonas: optimizing metabolic versatility and interactions with the environment
Open accessAbstract
Metabolically versatile free-living bacteria have global regulation systems that allow cells to selectively assimilate a preferred compound among a mixture of several potential carbon sources. This process is known as carbon catabolite repression (CCR). CCR optimizes metabolism, improving the ability of bacteria to compete in their natural habitats. This review summarizes the regulatory mechanisms responsible for CCR in the bacteria of the genus Pseudomonas, which can live in many different habitats. Although the information available is still limited, the molecular mechanisms responsible for CCR in Pseudomonas are clearly different from those of Enterobacteriaceae or Firmicutes. An understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying CCR is important to know how metabolism is regulated and how bacteria degrade compounds in the environment. This is particularly relevant for compounds that are degraded slowly and accumulate, creating environmental problems. CCR has a major impact on the genes involved in the transport and metabolism of nonpreferred carbon sources, but also affects the expression of virulence factors in several bacterial species, genes that are frequently directed to allow the bacterium to gain access to new sources of nutrients. Finally, CCR has implications in the optimization of biotechnological processes such as biotransformations or bioremediation strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacterial Biofilms: A Common Cause of Persistent Infections
Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S., & Greenberg, E. P. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 · Cited by 12,167
Carbon catabolite repression in bacteria: many ways to make the most out of nutrients
Görke, B., & Stülke, J. (2008) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1932 · Cited by 1,701
The mechanisms of carbon catabolite repression in bacteria
Deutscher, J. (2008) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2008.02.007 · Cited by 676
Cited by
Techer, D., D’Innocenzo, M., Laval-Gilly, P., Henry, S., Bennasroune, A., Martinez-Chois, C., & Falla, J. (2012) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.06.009 · Cited by 35
Wirth, N. T., & Nikel, P. I. (2021) · Chem Catalysis · doi:10.1016/j.checat.2021.09.002 · Cited by 26
Dolan, S. K., Wijaya, A., Kohlstedt, M., Gläser, L., Brear, P., Silva-Rocha, R., Wittmann, C., & Welch, M. (2022) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.02541-22 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Rojo, F.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 658-684
- ISSN
- 0168-6445 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6976
- OpenAlex
- W2159010530
- Cited by
- 539
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon catabolite repression in Pseudomonas: optimizing metabolic versatility and interactions with the environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00218.x
- The paper
- Rojo, F. (2010). Carbon catabolite repression in Pseudomonas: optimizing metabolic versatility and interactions with the environment. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00218.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.