Cited by 258Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A controlled multicenter clinical study of citalopram and placebo in elderly depressed patients with and without concomitant dementia

Nyth, A. L., Gottfries, C. G., Lyby, K., Smedegaard‐Andersen, L., Gylding‐Sabroe, J., Kristensen, M., Refsum, H.‐E., Öfsti, E., Eriksson, S., Syversen, S.·1992·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract

A total of 149 patients in 7 centers in Denmark, Norway and Sweden entered a 6‐week double‐blind trial intended to assess the antidepressant effect and safety of citalopram vs placebo in depressed elderly patients (65 years of age or older) who might also suffer from somatic disorders and/or senile dementia. Results of ratings on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, the Montgomery‐Åsberg Depression Rating Scale and the Clinical Global Impression Scale provided consistent evidence that the citalopram‐treated patients improved more than the placebo‐treated patients. Results of ratings on the Gottfries‐Bråne‐Steen dementia rating scale indicated that both cognitive and emotional functioning improved significantly more in the citalopram‐treated subgroup of patients with dementia than in the placebo‐treated subgroup.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1992.tb03242.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1056/NEJM198901193200306 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/geronj/31.3.283 · DOI
  3. 10.1176/ajp.137.4.439 · DOI
  4. 10.1192/bjp.150.6.815 · DOI
  5. Wattis JP., 1990, Diagnostic issues in depression in old age, Int Clin Psychopharmacol, 3, 1
  6. 10.1176/ajp.120.3.244 · DOI
  7. Knesevich JW., 1983, Preliminary report an affective symptoms in the early stages of senile dementia of the Alzheimer type, Am J Psychiatry, 44, 233
  8. Kral VA., 1983, The relationship between dementia (Alzheimer type) and depression, Can J Psychiatry, 28, 304, 10.1177/070674378302800414 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1986.tb07258.x · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1988.tb03427.x · DOI
  11. 10.1176/ajp.146.5.577 · DOI
  12. Barchas JD., 1977, Psychopharmacology. From theory to practice
  13. Gottfries CG., 1990, Neurochemical changes in the human brain and their importance for behavior in the senium, Triangle, 29, 127
  14. Gottfries CG., 1988, Alzheimer's disease, A critical review. Compr Gerontol C, 2, 47
  15. 10.1016/S0278-5846(82)80179-6 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1985.tb02576.x · DOI
  17. Danish University Antidepressant Group., 1986, Citalopram: clinical effect profile in comparison with clomipramine. A controlled multicentre study, Psychopharmacology, 90, 131
  18. 10.1192/bjp.149.4.515 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1987.tb02923.x · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1987.tb02821.x · DOI
  21. 10.1176/ajp.134.7.790 · DOI
  22. Hall RCW., 1984, Tricyclic antidepressants in treatment of the elderly, Geriatrics, 39, 81
  23. 10.1192/bjp.157.6.894 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 1980, American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
  25. 10.1016/0167-4943(82)90031-0 · DOI
  26. Guy W., 1976, ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology. Clinical Global Impressions (028‐CGI), 216
  27. 10.1176/ajp.146.3.350 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/338762a0 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/0014-2999(89)90215-X · DOI
  30. Rockwell E., 1988, Antidepressant drug studies in the elderly, Psychiatr Clin North Am, 11, 26, 10.1016/S0193-953X(18)30525-2 · DOI
  31. 10.1097/00004714-198810000-00002 · DOI
  32. Dencker SJ., 1988, Proceedings of a symposium, 31
  33. Benfield P., 1986, Fluvoxamine, A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in depressive illness. Drugs, 32, 313
  34. Benfield P., 1986, Fluoxetine, A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in depressive illness. Drugs, 32, 481

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nyth, A. L., Gottfries, C. G., Lyby, K., Smedegaard‐Andersen, L., Gylding‐Sabroe, J., Kristensen, M., Refsum, H. ‐., Öfsti, E., Eriksson, S., & Syversen, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Lundbeck (Denmark) (DK)
  • Drammen Hospital (NO)
  • Umeå University (SE)
  • Ryhov Hospital Jönköping (SE)
Corresponding author
Nyth, A. L.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-08
Volume
86
Issue
2
Pages
138-145
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
OpenAlex
W2133710857
Cited by
258
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
citalopram, depression, elderly patients, dementia, antidepressant efficacy, antidepressant safety, cognitive function, emotional functioning, somatic diseases, placebo comparison
MeSH terms
Aged, Cognition, Dementia, Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Placebos, Citalopram

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review