The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multi-zone modeling of probable SARS virus transmission by airflow between flats in Block E, Amoy Gardens
Open accessAbstract
UNLABELLED: More than 300 residents of a private high-rise housing estate were infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome within a short period during the 2003 epidemic in Hong Kong. The outbreak occurred after the identified index patient visited a flat on a middle floor in Block E of the Amoy Gardens estate on two nights. Approximately 45% of the subsequently infected people resided in Block E, while the other 55% of infected cases mainly resided in six other blocks close to Block E. The distribution of the infected flats in Block E conformed to a non-uniform spatial pattern. Probable environmental causes for airborne transmission associated with the air movements between flats in Block E are identified. The well-established multi-zone airflow modeling method was used to analyze the virus-laden bio-aerosol dispersion between flats through door and window leakage areas in Block E under six different scenarios. The distribution of infection risk in Block E matched with the virus concentrations in flats predicted with the use of multi-zone modeling. Our study shows the importance of ventilation design in high-rise residential apartments. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The present study on the Amoy Gardens outbreak presented a scenario in which crowded living spaces might lead to infection disasters. There is a need to improve the current sanitary drainage design and maintenance standards to avoid any leakage of foul gas into the indoor environments. Our study revealed the need for a review of indoor air quality and ventilation design in buildings including offices, homes and hotels. The study has implications to public health in, for example, the control of other airborne respiratory infectious diseases such as influenza, and in bio-terror safety in buildings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Viable SARS-CoV-2 in the air of a hospital room with COVID-19 patients
Lednicky, J. A., Lauzardo, M., Fan, Z. H., Jutla, A., Tilly, T. B., Gangwar, M., Usmani, M., Shankar, S. N., Mohamed, K., Eiguren-Fernandez, A., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.025 · Cited by 683
Comunian, S., Dongo, D., Milani, C., & Palestini, P. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17124487 · Cited by 464
Saliva: potential diagnostic value and transmission of 2019-nCoV
Xu, R., Cui, B., Duan, X., Zhang, P., Zhou, X., & Yuan, Q. (2020) · International Journal of Oral Science · doi:10.1038/s41368-020-0080-z · Cited by 394
Super-spreaders in infectious diseases
Stein, R. A. (2011) · International Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2010.06.020 · Cited by 388
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Y., Duan, S., Yu, I. T. S., & Wong, T. W.
- Venue
- Indoor Air
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 96-111
- ISSN
- 0905-6947 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0668
- OpenAlex
- W2000598270
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-zone modeling of probable SARS virus transmission by airflow between flats in Block E, Amoy Gardens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00318.x
- The paper
- Li, Y., Duan, S., Yu, I. T. S., & Wong, T. W. (2005). Multi-zone modeling of probable SARS virus transmission by airflow between flats in Block E, Amoy Gardens. Indoor Air. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00318.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.