Cited by 683Infection Control and VentilationSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

Viable SARS-CoV-2 in the air of a hospital room with COVID-19 patients

Open access
Lednicky, John A., Lauzardo, Michael, Fan, Z. Hugh, Jutla, Antarpreet, Tilly, Trevor B., Gangwar, Mayank, Usmani, Moiz, Shankar, Sripriya Nannu +11 more·2020·International Journal of Infectious Diseases

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Objectives Because the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in aerosols but failure to isolate viable (infectious) virus are commonly reported, there is substantial controversy whether severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can be transmitted through aerosols. This conundrum occurs because common air samplers can inactivate virions through their harsh collection processes. We sought to resolve the question whether viable SARS-CoV-2 can occur in aerosols using VIVAS air samplers that operate on a gentle water vapor condensation principle. Methods Air samples collected in the hospital room of two coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) patients, one ready for discharge and the other newly admitted, were subjected to RT-qPCR and virus culture. The genomes of the SARS-CoV-2 collected from the air and isolated in cell culture were sequenced. Results Viable SARS-CoV-2 was isolated from air samples collected 2 to 4.8 m away from the patients. The genome sequence of the SARS-CoV-2 strain isolated from the material collected by the air samplers was identical to that isolated from the newly admitted patient. Estimates of viable viral concentrations ranged from 6 to 74 TCID 50 units/L of air. Conclusions Patients with respiratory manifestations of COVID-19 produce aerosols in the absence of aerosol-generating procedures that contain viable SARS-CoV-2, and these aerosols may serve as a source of transmission of the virus.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.025

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerous earlier studies have established that aerosol expelled during normal respiratory activities can contain infectious influenza virus.

    “Numerous earlier studies have established that aerosol expelled during normal respiratory activities can contain infectious influenza virus [42, 45–54].”

    From The protective performance of reusable cloth face masks, disposable procedure masks, KN95 masks and N95 respirators: Filtration and total inward leakage (2021) · cites this paper as [42]

    The References (page unavailable) list a prior study titled “Collection of viable aerosolized influenza virus and other respiratory viruses in a student health care center,” which supports the narrower point that viable influenza virus has been collected from air. The cited paper’s Discussion concerns SARS-CoV-2, however, and does not establish that numerous studies found infectious influenza aerosol expelled during normal respiratory activities. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is a growing body of literature that supports airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 playing an increasingly important role in the spread of the disease.

    “With the progression of the pandemic there is a growing body of literature that supports airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 playing an increasingly important role in the spread of the disease [29, 39–44].”

    From The protective performance of reusable cloth face masks, disposable procedure masks, KN95 masks and N95 respirators: Filtration and total inward leakage (2021) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Discussion reports viable SARS-CoV-2 in patient-generated aerosols and says this suggests an inhalation risk. It also says the relative importance of aerosol transmission remains uncertain, so the paper does not establish that airborne transmission played an increasingly important role in the spread of COVID-19. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. HV Fineberg. Rapid expert consultation on the possibility of bioaerosol spread of SARS-CoV-2 for the COVID-19 pandemic (April 1, 2020). In: The National Academies Press N.R.C., ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, National Research Council. 2020.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lednicky, J. A., Lauzardo, M., Fan, Z. H., Jutla, A., Tilly, T. B., Gangwar, M., Usmani, M., Shankar, S. N., Mohamed, K., Eiguren-Fernandez, A., Stephenson, C. J., Alam, M. M., Elbadry, M. A., Loeb, J. C., Subramaniam, K., Waltzek, T. B., Cherabuddi, K., Morris, J. G., & Wu, C.-Y.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Lednicky, John A.
Venue
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
100
Pages
476-482
ISSN
1201-9712 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3087735045
Cited by
683
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 158 · 2021: 254 · 2020: 51
FWCI
77.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (1R43ES030649)
  • College of Medicine, University of Florida
  • Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of Florida
  • National Science Foundation (2030844, 1R43ES030649)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 pandemic, airborne transmission, aerosols, viral genome sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review