The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Salivary infectious agents and periodontal disease status: Salivary bacteria and periodontal disease
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The potential of salivary microorganisms to diagnose periodontal disease and to guide periodontal treatment is a research topic of current interest. This study aimed to determine whether the salivary counts of periodontopathic microbes correlated with the periodontal pocket counts of the same infectious agents, and whether the salivary counts of the test infectious agents could distinguish among individuals with periodontal health and various types of periodontal disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 150 systemically healthy adults, of whom 37 were periodontally healthy, 31 had gingivitis, 46 had chronic periodontitis and 36 had aggressive periodontitis. Each study subject contributed microbial samples from the two deepest periodontal pockets of the dentition and from whole saliva. Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Campylobacter rectus, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, Tannerella forsythia and Epstein-Barr virus were identified using the TaqMan real-time PCR methodology. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test and the receiver operating characteristic statistics. RESULTS: C. rectus, F. nucleatum, P. gingivalis, P. intermedia and T. forsythia occurred with significantly higher copy-counts in salivary samples from patients with gingivitis, chronic periodontitis and aggressive periodontitis than from periodontally healthy individuals. A. actinomycetemcomitans only showed higher salivary copy-counts in subjects with aggressive periodontitis compared with subjects with healthy periodontium, and the salivary copy-counts of Epstein-Barr virus did not reveal any significant difference among the four subject groups studied. The diagnostic sensitivity for periodontitis was 89.19 for P. gingivalis and for T. forsythia and 86.49 for P. intermedia, with specificities ranging from 83.78 to 94.59. The optimal copy-counts per mL saliva for identifying periodontitis were 40,000 for P. gingivalis, 700,000 for T. forsythia and 910,000 for P. intermedia. CONCLUSION: Salivary copy-counts of P. gingivalis, T. forsythia and P. intermedia appear to have the potential to identify the presence of periodontitis, whereas the salivary level of the other test infectious agents may possess little or no diagnostic utility. Longitudinal studies are warranted to determine the ability of salivary copy-counts of major periodontopathic bacteria to predict future periodontal breakdown.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Periodontal Disease in Pregnancy II. Correlation Between Oral Hygiene and Periodontal Condition
Silness, J., & Löe, H. (1964) · Acta Odontologica Scandinavica · doi:10.3109/00016356408993968 · Cited by 7,932
Socransky, S. S., & Haffajee, A. D. (2005) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0757.2005.00107.x · Cited by 1,691
T he D iagnostic A pplications of S aliva — A R eview
Kaufman, E., & Lamster, I. B. (2002) · Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine · doi:10.1177/154411130201300209 · Cited by 887
Cited by
Periodontitis: facts, fallacies and the future
Slots, J. (2017) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/prd.12221 · Cited by 1,153
Self-citationArimatsu, K., Yamada, H., Miyazawa, H., Minagawa, T., Nakajima, M., Ryder, M. I., Gotoh, K., Motooka, D., Nakamura, S., Iida, T., et al. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep04828 · Cited by 573
Saliva as a diagnostic tool for oral and systemic diseases
Javaid, M. A., Ahmed, A. S., Durand, R., & Tran, S. D. (2016) · Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research · doi:10.1016/j.jobcr.2015.08.006 · Cited by 431
Can oral bacteria affect the microbiome of the gut?
Olsen, I., & Yamazaki, K. (2019) · Journal of Oral Microbiology · doi:10.1080/20002297.2019.1586422 · Cited by 328
Gong, T., Chen, Q., Mao, H., Zhang, Y., Ren, H., Xu, M., Chen, H., & Yang, D. (2022) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2022.925435 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Saygun, I., Nizam, N., Keskiner, I., Bal, V., Kubar, A., Açıkel, C., Serdar, M., & Slots, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Periodontal Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01-25
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 235-239
- ISSN
- 0022-3484 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1852871843
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Salivary infectious agents and periodontal disease status: Salivary bacteria and periodontal disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0765.2010.01335.x
- The paper
- Saygun, I., Nizam, N., Keskiner, I., Bal, V., Kubar, A., Açıkel, C., Serdar, M., & Slots, J. (2011). Salivary infectious agents and periodontal disease status: Salivary bacteria and periodontal disease. Journal of Periodontal Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.2010.01335.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.