Cited by 150Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationSport Psychology and Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Translation and measurement properties of the Swedish version of ACL‐Return to Sports after Injury questionnaire

Open access
Kvist, J., Österberg, A., Gauffin, H., Tagesson, S., Webster, K., Ardern, C.·2013·Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports

Abstract

Psychological factors may be a hindrance for returning to sport after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The ACL‐Return to Sport after Injury scale (ACL‐RSI) measures athletes' emotions, confidence in performance, and risk appraisal in relation to return to sport. The aim of this study was to translate the ACL‐RSI scale from English to Swedish and to examine some of the measurement properties of the Swedish version. The ACL‐RSI was translated and culturally adapted. A professional expert group and five patients evaluated face validity. One hundred and eighty‐two patients completed the translated ACL‐RSI, a project‐specific questionnaire, the T ampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), the Knee‐Self‐Efficacy Scale (K‐SES), the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC‐C), the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and the Anterior Cruciate Ligament‐Quality of Life (ACL‐QoL) questionnaires. Fifty‐three patients answered the ACL‐RSI twice to examine reproducibility. The ACL‐RSI showed good face validity, internal consistency (C ronbach's alpha = 0.948), low floor and ceiling effects and high construct validity when evaluated against the TSK, K‐SES, MHLC‐C, KOOS, and ACL‐QoL scales. The reproducibility was also high (intra‐class correlation = 0.893). Therefore, the ACL‐RSI can be used to evaluate psychological factors relevant to returning to sport after ACL reconstruction surgery.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01438.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1136/bjsm.2010.076364 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00126-1 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00015 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2006.00601.x · DOI
  5. 10.1097/00007632-199612150-00023 · DOI
  6. 10.2519/jospt.2008.2887 · DOI
  7. Dillman DA, 1978, Mail and telephone surveys: the total design method
  8. 10.1080/17457300.2010.545129 · DOI
  9. 10.1177/03635465030310041501 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s00167-006-0050-9 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2007.00700.x · DOI
  12. Junge A, 2000, The influence of psychological factors on sports injuries. Review of the literature, Am J Sports Med, 28, S10, 10.1177/28.suppl_5.s-10 · DOI
  13. Kori SH, 1990, Kinisophobia: a new view of chronic pain behavior, Pain Manag, 3, 35
  14. 10.1007/s00167-004-0591-8 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1136/bjsm.2007.044818 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1177/1941738108326700 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/14038190601103548 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0749-8063(03)00398-0 · DOI
  19. Mohtadi N, 1998, Development and validation of the quality of life outcome measure (questionnaire) for chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency, Am J Sports Med, 26, 350, 10.1177/03635465980260030201 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1097/00042752-199904000-00004 · DOI
  22. Rea LM, 1997, Designing and conducting survey research: a comprehensive guide
  23. 10.2519/jospt.1998.28.2.88 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2005.00472.x · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s00167-007-0433-6 · DOI
  26. 10.1037/0090-5550.52.1.74 · DOI
  27. 10.1037/0022-006X.44.4.580 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.ptsp.2007.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1080/10413209808406377 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kvist, J., Österberg, A., Gauffin, H., Tagesson, S., Webster, K., & Ardern, C.
Affiliations
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Linköping University Hospital (SE)
  • La Trobe University (AU)
Corresponding author
Kvist, J.
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-01-18
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
568-575
ISSN
  • 0905-7188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0838
OpenAlex
W1571093830
Cited by
150
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
Keywords
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, return to sport, psychological factors, Swedish translation, cross-cultural adaptation, measurement properties, construct validity, reproducibility, kinesiophobia, health locus of control
MeSH terms
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Adult, Athletic Injuries, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Recurrence, Sweden, Translations, Reproducibility of Results, Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Recovery of Function, Self Efficacy, Young Adult, Athletes, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review