The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gender differences in endurance performance by elite cross-country skiers are influenced by the contribution from poling
Abstract
Greater gender differences have been found in exercise modes where the upper body is involved. Therefore, the present study investigated the influence of poling on gender differences in endurance performance by elite cross‐country skiers. Initially, the performance of eight male and eight female sprint skiers was compared during four different types of exercise involving different degrees of poling: double poling ( DP ), G 3 skating, and diagonal stride ( DIA ) techniques during treadmill roller skiing, and treadmill running ( RUN ). Thereafter, DP was examined for physiological and kinematic parameters. The relative gender differences associated with the DP , G 3, DIA and RUN performances were approximately 20%, 17%, 14%, and 12%, respectively. Thus, the type of exercise exerted an overall effect on the relative gender differences ( P < 0.05). In connection with DP , the men achieved 63%, 16%, and 8% higher VO 2peak than the women in absolute terms and with normalization for total and fat‐free body mass (all P < 0.05). The DP VO 2peak in percentage of VO 2max in RUN was higher in men ( P < 0.05). The gender difference in DP peak cycle length was 23% ( P < 0.05). In conclusion, the present investigation demonstrates that the gender difference in performance by elite sprint skiers is enhanced when the contribution from poling increases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The relative (to body mass) VO2max differs by about 10% between male and female athletes, which is primarily explained by the higher percentage of body fat and lower hemoglobin levels in women [135,141].”
From Nutrition for Older Athletes: Focus on Sex-Differences (2021) · cites this paper as [135]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- 10.1097/00005768-200001000-00012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1152/jappl.1999.87.4.1317 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2010.02125.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1139/h04-010 · DOI
- Durnin JV, 1973, Total body fat, calculated from body density, and its relationship to skinfold thickness in 571 people aged 12–72 years, Proc Nutr Soc, 32, 45
- 10.1249/01.MSS.0000162615.47763.C8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1600-0838.1991.tb00267.x · DOI
- 10.1249/00003677-199301000-00004 · DOI
- 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318184f436 · DOI
- Maldonado‐Martin S, 2004, Physiological variables to use in the gender comparison in highly trained runners, J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 44, 8
- 10.1080/003655100750019279 · DOI
- 10.1097/00005768-199811000-00014 · DOI
- 10.1080/14763140408522832 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00421-011-2063-4 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00421-010-1372-3 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00421-010-1719-9 · DOI
- 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d82d11 · DOI
- Schumacher YO, 2001, Development of peak performance in track cycling, J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 41, 139
- 10.1249/01.mss.0000247005.17342.2b · DOI
- 10.1249/00005768-199209000-00011 · DOI
- 10.1080/02640410500520559 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01078.x · DOI
- Stöggl T, 2008, 4th International Congress on Skiing and Science (ICSS), 657
Cited by
The elite cross‐country skier provides unique insights into human exercise physiology
Holmberg, H. ‐. (2015) · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports · doi:10.1111/sms.12601 · Cited by 113
Self-citationThe Physiological Capacity of the World’s Highest Ranked Female Cross-country Skiers
SANDBAKK, Ø., HEGGE, A. M., LOSNEGARD, T., SKATTEBO, Ø., TØNNESSEN, E., & HOLMBERG, H.-C. (2016) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000000862 · Cited by 110
Self-citationEnergy system contribution during competitive cross-country skiing
Losnegard, T. (2019) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-019-04158-x · Cited by 99
Solli, G. S., Kocbach, J., Seeberg, T. M., Tjønnås, J., Rindal, O. M. H., Haugnes, P., Torvik, P. Ø., & Sandbakk, Ø. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0207195 · Cited by 39
Self-citationComparison of Exclusive Double Poling to Classic Techniques of Cross-country Skiing
STÖGGL, T., OHTONEN, O., TAKEDA, M., MIYAMOTO, N., SNYDER, C., LEMMETTYLÄ, T., LINNAMO, V., & LINDINGER, S. J. (2019) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000001840 · Cited by 31
Nutrition for Older Athletes: Focus on Sex-Differences
Strasser, B., Pesta, D., Rittweger, J., Burtscher, J., & Burtscher, M. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13051409 · Cited by 25
Solli, G. S., Sandbakk, Ø., & McGawley, K. (2024) · Sports Medicine - Open · doi:10.1186/s40798-024-00792-8 · Cited by 14
Self-citationForot, J., Schorderet, F., Burdet, C., Brocherie, F., & Millet, G. P. (2026) · Experimental Physiology · doi:10.1113/ep093311 · Cited by 1
“Thisinterpretationissupportedby previous work showing that sex differences in endurance performance among elite cross-country skiers are strongly influenced by upper-body contribution, particularly during poling (Sandbakk et al., 2014).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Sandbakk, Ø., Ettema, G., & Holmberg, H. ‐.
- Affiliations
- Department of Human Movement Science Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim Norway
- Swedish Winter Sports Research Centre Department of Health Sciences Mid Sweden University Östersund Sweden
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-05-24
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-33
- ISSN
- 0905-7188
- 1600-0838
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.