The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical microneedle injection of methyl nicotinate: stratum corneum penetration
Abstract
Background/purpose:In recent years, microneedles were proposed as a method to painlessly deliver drugs past the stratum corneum. Microneedles have been fabricated in several designs, but limited studies have tested microneedle injections in humans. In this work, we compare microneedle injections with topical application (TA) to investigate if microneedles enhance in vivo drug delivery past the stratum corneum. Method:In vitro tests were used to measure microneedle pressures and injection volumes.In vivo microneedle injections were performed on the volar forearm of 11 healthy volunteers. Two sets of microneedles, pointed and symmetric, were used to develop microneedle/syringe apparatuses that were used to inject approximately 1 μL of 0.1 M methyl nicotinate, and were compared against TA. A Laser Doppler Perfusion Monitor was used to record maximum blood flow and the time to maximum blood flow at the treatment sites. Results:Pointed and symmetric microneedle‐injected sites showed a significantly faster time to maximum blood flow than TA. The pointed microneedle injections also resulted in a higher maximum blood flux. Volunteers reported feeling pressure but no pain from the microneedles during the injections. Conclusion:The microneedles aid in bypassing the stratum corneum and enhance drug delivery through it. The design of the microneedle influences its delivery capabilities, because the pointed microneedles seem to be less susceptible to clogging during the injection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McAllister, D. V., Wang, P. M., Davis, S. P., Park, J.-H., Canatella, P. J., Allen, M. G., & Prausnitz, M. R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2331316100 · Cited by 859
Silicon micromachined hollow microneedles for transdermal liquid transport
Gardeniers, H. J. G. E., Luttge, R., Berenschot, E. J. W., de Boer, M. J., Yeshurun, S. Y., Hefetz, M., van-t Oever, R., & van den Berg, A. (2003) · Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems · doi:10.1109/jmems.2003.820293 · Cited by 413
Cited by
Microneedles for drug and vaccine delivery
Kim, Y.-C., Park, J.-H., & Prausnitz, M. R. (2012) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.04.005 · Cited by 1,760
Metadata
- Authors
- Sivamani, R. K., Stoeber, B., Wu, G. C., Zhai, H., Liepmann, D., & Maibach, H.
- Venue
- Skin Research and Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03-31
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 152-156
- ISSN
- 0909-752X (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0846
- OpenAlex
- W2063472013
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical microneedle injection of methyl nicotinate: stratum corneum penetration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0846.2005.00107.x
- The paper
- Sivamani, R. K., Stoeber, B., Wu, G. C., Zhai, H., Liepmann, D., & Maibach, H. (2005). Clinical microneedle injection of methyl nicotinate: stratum corneum penetration. Skin Research and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0846.2005.00107.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.