Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 171

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical microneedle injection of methyl nicotinate: stratum corneum penetration

Sivamani, Raja K., Stoeber, Boris, Wu, Gabriel C., Zhai, Hongbo, Liepmann, Dorian, Maibach, Howard·2005·Skin Research and Technology

Abstract

Background/purpose:In recent years, microneedles were proposed as a method to painlessly deliver drugs past the stratum corneum. Microneedles have been fabricated in several designs, but limited studies have tested microneedle injections in humans. In this work, we compare microneedle injections with topical application (TA) to investigate if microneedles enhance in vivo drug delivery past the stratum corneum. Method:In vitro tests were used to measure microneedle pressures and injection volumes.In vivo microneedle injections were performed on the volar forearm of 11 healthy volunteers. Two sets of microneedles, pointed and symmetric, were used to develop microneedle/syringe apparatuses that were used to inject approximately 1 μL of 0.1 M methyl nicotinate, and were compared against TA. A Laser Doppler Perfusion Monitor was used to record maximum blood flow and the time to maximum blood flow at the treatment sites. Results:Pointed and symmetric microneedle‐injected sites showed a significantly faster time to maximum blood flow than TA. The pointed microneedle injections also resulted in a higher maximum blood flux. Volunteers reported feeling pressure but no pain from the microneedles during the injections. Conclusion:The microneedles aid in bypassing the stratum corneum and enhance drug delivery through it. The design of the microneedle influences its delivery capabilities, because the pointed microneedles seem to be less susceptible to clogging during the injection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2005.00107.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 171

Metadata

Authors
Sivamani, R. K., Stoeber, B., Wu, G. C., Zhai, H., Liepmann, D., & Maibach, H.
Venue
Skin Research and Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-03-31
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
152-156
ISSN
  • 0909-752X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0846
OpenAlex
W2063472013
Cited by
171
References
2
FWCI
9.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical microneedle injection of methyl nicotinate: stratum corneum penetration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0846.2005.00107.x
The paper
Sivamani, R. K., Stoeber, B., Wu, G. C., Zhai, H., Liepmann, D., & Maibach, H. (2005). Clinical microneedle injection of methyl nicotinate: stratum corneum penetration. Skin Research and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0846.2005.00107.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.