Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 723

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rational Development of LEA29Y (belatacept), a High-Affinity Variant of CTLA4-Ig with Potent Immunosuppressive Properties

Open access
Larsen, Christian P., Pearson, Thomas C., Adams, Andrew B., Tso, Paul, Shirasugi, Nozomu, Strobertb, Elizabeth, Anderson, Dan, Cowan, Shannon, Price, Karen, Naemura, Joseph, Emswiler, John, Greene, JoAnne, Turk, Lori Ann, Bajorath, Jurgen, Townsend, Robert, Hagerty, David, Linsley, Peter S., Peach, Robert J.·2005·American Journal of Transplantation

Abstract

Current success in organ transplantation is dependent upon the use of calcineurin-inhibitor-based immunosuppressive regimens. Unfortunately, current immunotherapy targets molecules with ubiquitous expression resulting in devastating non-immune side effects. T-cell costimulation has been identified as a new potential immunosuppressive target. The best characterized pathway includes CD28, its homologue CTLA4 and their ligands CD80 and CD86. While an immunoglobulin fusion protein construct of CTLA4 suppressed rejection in rodents, it lacked efficacy in primate transplant models. In an attempt to increase the biologic potency of the parent molecule a novel, modified version of CTLA4-Ig, LEA29Y (belatacept), was constructed. Two amino acid substitutions (L104E and A29Y) gave rise to slower dissociation rates for both CD86 and CD80. The increased avidity resulted in a 10-fold increase in potency in vitro and significant prolongation of renal allograft survival in a pre-clinical primate model. The use of immunoselective biologics may provide effective maintenance immunosuppression while avoiding the collateral toxicities associated with conventional immunsuppressants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00749.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 723

Metadata

Authors
Larsen, C. P., Pearson, T. C., Adams, A. B., Tso, P., Shirasugi, N., Strobertb, E., Anderson, D., Cowan, S., Price, K., Naemura, J., Emswiler, J., Greene, J., Turk, L. A., Bajorath, J., Townsend, R., Hagerty, D., Linsley, P. S., & Peach, R. J.
Venue
American Journal of Transplantation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-03
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
443-453
ISSN
1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137780217
Cited by
723
References
3
FWCI
17.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rational Development of LEA29Y (belatacept), a High-Affinity Variant of CTLA4-Ig with Potent Immunosuppressive Properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00749.x
The paper
Larsen, C. P., Pearson, T. C., Adams, A. B., Tso, P., Shirasugi, N., Strobertb, E., Anderson, D., Cowan, S., Price, K., Naemura, J., Emswiler, J., Greene, J., Turk, L. A., Bajorath, J., Townsend, R., Hagerty, D., Linsley, P. S., & Peach, R. J. (2005). Rational Development of LEA29Y (belatacept), a High-Affinity Variant of CTLA4-Ig with Potent Immunosuppressive Properties. American Journal of Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00749.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.