Cited by 459Organ Transplantation Techniques and OutcomesLiver Disease and TransplantationTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes

Survival Outcomes Following Liver Transplantation (SOFT) Score: A Novel Method to Predict Patient Survival Following Liver Transplantation

Open access
Rana, A., Hardy, M.A., Halazun, K.J., Woodland, D.C., Ratner, L.E., Samstein, B., Guarrera, J.V., Brown, R.S. +1 more·2008·American Journal of Transplantation

Abstract

It is critical to balance waitlist mortality against posttransplant mortality. Our objective was to devise a scoring system that predicts recipient survival at 3 months following liver transplantation to complement MELD-predicted waitlist mortality. Univariate and multivariate analysis on 21,673 liver transplant recipients identified independent recipient and donor risk factors for posttransplant mortality. A retrospective analysis conducted on 30,321 waitlisted candidates reevaluated the predictive ability of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. We identified 13 recipient factors, 4 donor factors and 2 operative factors (warm and cold ischemia) as significant predictors of recipient mortality following liver transplantation at 3 months. The Survival Outcomes Following Liver Transplant (SOFT) Score utilized 18 risk factors (excluding warm ischemia) to successfully predict 3-month recipient survival following liver transplantation. This analysis represents a study of waitlisted candidates and transplant recipients of liver allografts after the MELD score was implemented. Unlike MELD, the SOFT score can accurately predict 3-month survival following liver transplantation. The most significant risk factors were previous transplantation and life support pretransplant. The SOFT score can help clinicians determine in real time which candidates should be transplanted with which allografts. Combined with MELD, SOFT can better quantify survival benefit for individual transplant procedures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02400.x

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rana and coworkers developed the SOFT score that integrates recipient and donor characteristics to predict liver transplant 3-month prognosis.

    “Similarly, Rana and coworkers used the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN)/Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) data to develop the Survival Outcome Following Liver Transplant (SOFT) score that integrates recipient and donor characteristics to predict liver transplant 3-month prognosis (13).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rana, A., Hardy, M. A., Halazun, K. J., Woodland, D. C., Ratner, L. E., Samstein, B., Guarrera, J. V., Brown, R. S., & Emond, J. C.
Affiliations
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Rana, A.
Venue
American Journal of Transplantation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
8
Issue
12
Pages
2537-2546
ISSN
1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979066818
Cited by
459
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 18
FWCI
11.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Transplantation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Health Resources and Services Administration
  • U.S. Public Health Service (231-00-0115)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL07854-11, T32HL007854)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Keywords
liver transplantation, post-transplant mortality, survival prediction, MELD score, waitlist mortality, risk factors, donor risk factors, recipient risk factors, cold ischemia, warm ischemia, transplant candidate selection
MeSH terms
Adult, Decision Support Techniques, Female, Humans, Liver Diseases, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Waiting Lists, Multivariate Analysis, Survival Analysis, Liver Transplantation, Treatment Outcome, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Endpoint Determination, Warm Ischemia, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review