Cited by 27

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Isoform-specific effects of apolipoprotein E on cognitive performance in targeted-replacement mice overexpressing human APP

Kornecook, T. J., McKinney, A. P., Ferguson, M. T., Dodart, J.‐C.·2010·Genes, Brain and Behavior

Abstract

The ε4 allele of apolipoprotein E (apoE4) is the predominant genetic risk factor for late‐onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) and is also implicated in cognitive deficits associated with normal aging. The biological mechanisms by which APOE genotype affects cognitive processes or AD pathogenesis remain unclear, but interactions of apoE with amyloid β peptide (Aβ) are thought to play an important role in mediating apoE's isoform‐specific effects on brain function. Here, we investigated the potential isoform‐dependent effects of apoE on behavioral and cognitive performance in human apoE3 and apoE4 targeted‐replacement (TR) mice that also overexpress the human amyloid precursor protein (APP). Beginning at 6–7 months of age, female APP‐Yac/apoE3‐TR (‘poE3’) and APP‐Yac/apoE4‐TR (‘poE4’) mice were tested on a battery of tests to evaluate basic sensorimotor functioning, spatial working memory, spatial recognition, episodic‐like memory and attentional processing. Compared with apoE3 mice, a generalized reduction in locomotor activity was observed in apoE4 mice. Moderate, but significant, cognitive impairments were also detected in apoE4 mice in the novel object‐location preference task, the contextual fear conditioning test, and a two‐choice visual discrimination/detection test, however spontaneous alternation performance in the Y‐maze was spared. These results offer additional support for the negative impact of apoE4 on both memory and attention and further suggest that APP‐Yac/apoE‐TR mice provide a novel and useful model for investigating the role of apoE in mediating susceptibility to cognitive decline.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1601-183x.2009.00545.x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1002/1098-1063(2001)11:1<8::AID-HIPO1015>3.0.CO;2-7 · DOI
  2. Bartrés‐Faz D., 2002, Apolipoprotein E gender effects on cognitive performance in age‐associated memory impairment, J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, 14, 80, 10.1176/jnp.14.1.80 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.05.008 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Brendza R.P. Bales K.R. Paul S.M.&Holtzman D.M.(2002).Role of apoE/Aβ interactions in Alzheimer's disease: insights from transgenic mouse models.Mol Psychiatry7 132–135. · DOI
  5. 10.1212/WNL.53.1.201 · DOI
  6. 10.1101/lm.51002 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1126/science.8346443 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1212/WNL.51.1.149 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/S0006-8993(98)01258-X · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.08.009 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.04.036 · DOI
  12. 10.1006/nbdi.2002.0483 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1212/WNL.48.5_Suppl_6.30S · DOI
  14. 10.1001/jama.1997.03550160069041 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1002/1096-8628(20001204)96:6<707::AID-AJMG1>3.0.CO;2-V · DOI
  16. Gold C.A.&Budson A.E.(2008).Memory loss in Alzheimer's disease: implications for development of therapeutics.Expert Rev Neurother8 1879–1891. · DOI
  17. 10.1037/0894-4105.19.2.199 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.09.019 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.10.006 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/S0149-7634(01)00041-0 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/ng0993-22 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1097/00002093-199501002-00008 · DOI
  23. 10.1126/science.3283935 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1073/pnas.0600549103 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1385/JMN:23:3:235 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1212/WNL.57.1.89 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19980323)392:4<428::AID-CNE2>3.0.CO;2-2 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/0006-8993(91)91092-F · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.02.019 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/0896-6273(93)90070-8 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1001/archneur.1994.00540240033012 · DOI
  32. 10.1037/0735-7044.106.2.274 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1016/0166-2236(94)90156-2 · DOI
  34. 10.1073/pnas.95.18.10914 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1212/WNL.43.8.1467 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1073/pnas.90.5.1977 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2003.10.011 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/0166-4328(96)00016-2 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.10.024 · DOI
  40. 10.1096/fasebj.10.13.8940294 · DOI
  41. Wisniewski T., 1994, Acceleration of Alzheimer's fibril formation by apolipoprotein E in vitro, Am J Pathol, 145, 1030

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kornecook, T. J., McKinney, A. P., Ferguson, M. T., & Dodart, J. ‐.
Venue
Genes, Brain and Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-03
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
182-192
ISSN
  • 1601-1848
  • 1601-183X
Cited by
27
References
8
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review