Cited by 125Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Clinical application of apolipoprotein E genotyping to Alzheimer's disease

Roses, AllenD., Strittmatter, WarrenJ., Pericak-Vance, MargaretA., Corder, ElizabethH., Saunders, AnnM., Schmechel, DonaldE.·1994·The Lancet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)92960-2

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roses, A., Strittmatter, W., Pericak-Vance, M., Corder, E., Saunders, A., & Schmechel, D.
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-06
Volume
343
Issue
8912
Pages
1564-1565
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2049634901
Cited by
125
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
11.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
apolipoprotein E, APOE genotyping, Alzheimer's disease, genetic risk factors, diagnosis
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alleles, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Genotype, Humans, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review