The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond Self‐Reports: Changes in Biomarkers as Predictors of Mortality
Abstract
The proliferation of biosocial surveys has increased the importance of weighing the costs and benefits of adding biomarker collection to population‐based surveys. A crucial question is whether biomarkers offer incremental value beyond self‐reported measures, which are easier to collect and impose less respondent burden. We use longitudinal data from a nationally representative sample of older Taiwanese (aged 54+ in 2000, examined in 2000 and 2006 with mortality follow‐up through 2011) to address that question with respect to predicting all‐cause mortality. A summary measure of biomarkers improves mortality prediction (as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) compared with self‐reports alone, but individual biomarkers perform better than the summary score. We find that incorporating change in biomarkers over a six‐year period yields a small improvement in mortality prediction compared with one‐time measurement. But, is the incremental value worth the costs?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Multiple studies indicate higher allostatic load is associated with increased risk of mortality”
From Allostatic load and biological anthropology (2017) · cites this paper as Glei et al., 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316 · Cited by 7,272
Allostatic load as a marker of cumulative biological risk: MacArthur studies of successful aging
Seeman, T. E., McEwen, B. S., Rowe, J. W., & Singer, B. H. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.081072698 · Cited by 1,385
Fried, L. P. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.279.8.585 · Cited by 1,107
Prognostic Indices for Older Adults: A Systematic Review
Yourman, L. C., Lee, S. J., Schonberg, M. A., Widera, E. W., & Smith, A. K. (2012) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1966 · Cited by 736 · cited 2×
“2006b) discrimination, although none of the existing prognostic indices has attained excellent discrimination (Yourman et al. 2012).”
BackgroundPersonality, Well-Being, and Health*
Friedman, H. S., & Kern, M. L. (2014) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115123 · Cited by 530 · cited 1×
“In addition to strong validity, all-cause mortality has the advantage of avoiding the problem that studies of a single disease may miss some deaths that were attributed to a different cause, but resulted indirectly from the disease of interest (Friedman and Kern 2014).”
BackgroundBioindicators in the MIDUS National Study: Protocol, Measures, Sample, and Comparative Context
Dienberg Love, G., Seeman, T. E., Weinstein, M., & Ryff, C. D. (2010) · Journal of Aging and Health · doi:10.1177/0898264310374355 · Cited by 333
Self-citationSchonberg, M. A., Davis, R. B., McCarthy, E. P., & Marcantonio, E. R. (2009) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-009-1073-y · Cited by 214
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 56
- 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/003335491012500608 · DOI
- Chang Ming-Cheng, 2012, Social Environment and Biomarkers of Aging Study (SEBAS) in Taiwan, 2000 and 2006: Main documentation for SEBAS longitudinal public use data (released 2012)
- 10.1159/000180580 · DOI
- 10.1093/geronb/gbp037 · DOI
- 10.1093/gerona/gln010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1353/dem.2010.0005 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-90-481-9996-9_18 · DOI
- Department of Health (Taiwan)., 2002, Definition of adult obesity [English translation]
- Department of Health, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan)., 2012, Deaths in Taiwan, 2011
- Glei Dana A., Demographic Studies on Survival and Health. Springer-Max Planck Series
- 10.1093/aje/kwn389 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00580-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.exger.2006.06.050 · DOI
- 10.1093/gerona/61.10.1070 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0606215103 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/sim.3859 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2288-11-103 · DOI
- Hoyert Donna L., 2012, National Vital Statistics Reports
- Human Mortality Database., 2013, University of California
- 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/01.psy.0000221270.93985.82 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.293.13.1609 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.archger.2007.02.001 · DOI
- 10.1503/cmaj.050880 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.295.7.801 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7326/0003-4819-139-2-200307150-00013 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/gerona/gls233 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.CIR.100.11.1148 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.mlr.0000102293.37107.c5 · DOI
- 10.1001/archinte.1993.00410180039004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/gerona/59.12.1295 · DOI
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)., 1998, Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: executive summary
- National Research Council and Institute of Medicine., 2013, Institute of Medicine
- 10.1093/gerona/glp127 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11357-010-9154-8 · DOI
- 10.1002/sim.1802 · DOI
- 10.1002/sim.2929 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/aje/kws207 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/1478-7954-10-11 · DOI
- Royston Patrick, 2009, Multiple imputation of missing values: New features for mim, Stata Journal, 9, 252, 10.1177/1536867X0900900205 · DOI
- 10.1080/01621459.1996.10476908 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/096228029900800102 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00402-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ajhb.21018 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.08.008 · DOI
- StataCorp., 2011, Stata: Release 12. Statistical Software
- 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.062 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2318-10-55 · DOI
- The Biomarker Network., 2013, Descriptions of Selected Population Studies with Biomarkers
- 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2005.00093.x · DOI
- Wachter Kenneth W., 2001, Cells and Surveys: Should Biological Measures be Included in Social Science Research?, 329
- Wachter Kenneth W., 1997, Between Zeus and the Salmon: The Biodemography of Longevity
- Walzog Barbara, 2000, Adhesion molecules: The path to a new understanding of acute inflammation, News in Physiological Sciences: An International Journal of Physiology Produced Jointly by the International Union of Physiological Sciences and the American Physiological Society, 15, 107
- 10.1056/NEJMoa055373 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.006 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Allostatic load and biological anthropology
Edes, A. N., & Crews, D. E. (2017) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.23146 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Glei, D. A., Goldman, N., Rodríguez, G., & Weinstein, M.
- Affiliations
- Senior Research Investigator, Center for Population and Health, Georgetown University.
- Hughes‐Rogers Professor of Demography and Public Affairs, Office of Population Research, Princeton University.
- Senior Research Demographer, Office of Population Research, Princeton University.
- Distinguished Professor, Center for Population and Health, Georgetown University.
- Venue
- Population and Development Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 331-360
- ISSN
- 0098-7921
- 1728-4457
- PMC
- PMC4117355
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review