Cited by 40Sexual function and dysfunction studiesSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyUrological Disorders and Treatments

BEHAVIOURAL AND CLINICAL FINDINGS IN COUPLES WHERE THE MAN PRESENTS WITH ERECTILE DISORDER: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Open access
Riley, A, Riley, E·2000·International Journal of Clinical Practice

Abstract

SUMMARY: Relevant data were extracted from the case records of a consecutive series of 128 men (median age 57 years) who presented with erectile disorder and whose partners (median age 54 years) attended on the first or second consultation. The case records included responses to questionnaires addressing issues relating to sexual behaviour, used routinely in the clinic. Of these partners, 123 agreed to be clinically examined, including pelvic examination. The duration of erectile disorder ranged from less than one year to 40 years. Only about 10% of couples had experienced sexual kissing and/or caressing in the four weeks before presentation. Almost half the couples had not experienced any sexual activity for about 2.5 years. While 83.7% of men considered intercourse to be important to themselves, only 20.2% of the women rated intercourse somewhat or very important. Clinical evidence of urogenital atrophy was present in 33.3% of women over the age of 46 years. Three women had a vaginismic response to examination in the clinic and one of these women reported long term vaginismus pre‐dating the onset of her partner's erectile disorder. One case of malignant ovarian tumour was identified. The observations from this study demonstrate the need to involve the partner in the assessment process of men presenting with erectile disorder. (Int J Clin Pract 2000; 54(4): 220‐224)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2000.tb11889.x

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In men aged 40 to 70, there is a significant relationship between erectile dysfunction and depression, with odds ratios ranging from 1.7 to 1.8.

    “In men who range in age from 40 to 70, these researchers found a significant relationship between the presence of ED and depression (ORs ranging from 1.7 to 1.8).”

    From Prostate cancer: Psychosocial implications and management (2008) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Results describe men aged 36–82, not an analysis limited to ages 40–70. Searches for depression and odds ratios found no passage reporting an association between erectile dysfunction and depression or ORs of 1.7–1.8; the paper mentions distress but does not establish the claimed relationship. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [1]1. I. Riley A, Pryor J, Craig A, Hodson P. How erectile dysfunction is per- ceived hy patients and partners: the results of a UK survey. lilt .I Sex Dison/. In press.
  2. [4]4. Carrier S, Brock (i, Kour NW, Luc TF. Pathophysiology of erectile dys- function. Uro/og\' 1993; 42: 468-481.
  3. [8]8. Hawton, K. Sex therapy: a practical guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.
  4. [14]14. Cooper GF. The psychological methods of sex therapy. In: Cole M, Dryden W. Eds. Sex therapy in Britain. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1988; 127-164.
  5. [18]18. Leiblum S, Bachmann G, Kemmann E et al. Vaginal atrophy in post- menopausal women. JAMA 1983; 249: 2195-2198.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Riley, A., & Riley, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Lancashire (GB)
  • Sagacity Associates Ltd Preston Lancashire
Corresponding author
Riley, A
Venue
International Journal of Clinical Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-05
Volume
54
Issue
4
Pages
220-224
ISSN
  • 1368-5031 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-1241
OpenAlex
W2401834023
Cited by
40
References
17
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
erectile dysfunction, couples, sexual behavior, female sexual dysfunction, urogenital atrophy, vaginismus, sexual intimacy, pelvic examination, ovarian neoplasms
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Middle Aged, Referral and Consultation, Retrospective Studies, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, Sexual Partners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review