Cited by 61Sexual function and dysfunction studiesSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyMarriage and Sexual Relationships

Psychosexual functioning of partners of men with presumed non-organic erectile dysfunction: Cause or consequence of the disorder?

Speckens, Anne E. M., Hengeveld, Michiel W., Nijeholt, Guus Lycklama à, van Hemert, Albert M., Hawton, Keith E.·1995·Archives of Sexual Behavior

Abstract

In the treatment of couples where the male partners have erectile dysfunction (ED) it often becomes apparent that characteristics of the female partners and of the relationship in general have contributed to the problem. However, this has received little research attention. We investigated female partners of men with ED where no organic cause could be found (n = 34) and partners of men with organically based ED (n = 71) to compare their views on their relationships, sexual function, sexual attitudes, and psychological adjustment. Relationship problems and the psychosexual dysfunctions of vaginismus and dyspareunia were more common in the partners of men with nonorganic ED; they also reported higher levels of sexual interest. Female sexual dysfunctions in the nonorganic ED group had usually preceded the onset of the erectile difficulties. While belief in male sexual myths was substantial in both groups of patients, neither the presence of traditional views on sexuality nor psychological complaints distinguished partners of men experiencing nonorganic ED from those with organic ED. Relationship problems, female psychosexual dysfunction, and the possible effect of relatively high levels of female sexual interest may contribute to the onset, exacerbation, and maintenance of ED. These should be addressed during assessment and treatment of couples in which the male partners have erectile difficulties.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01541579

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Speckens, A. E. M., Hengeveld, M. W., Nijeholt, G. L. À., van Hemert, A. M., & Hawton, K. E.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • Warneford Hospital (GB)
Venue
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Published
1995-04
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
157-172
ISSN
  • 0004-0002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2800
OpenAlex
W2016897346
Cited by
61
References
28
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
Keywords
erectile dysfunction, organic erectile dysfunction, couples, female sexual dysfunction, vaginismus, dyspareunia, sexual attitudes, sexual myths, relationship problems, psychological adjustment, psychosexual functioning
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Marriage, Middle Aged, Sexual Partners, Linear Models, Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review