Cited by 279Emergency and Acute Care StudiesHealthcare Operations and Scheduling OptimizationHealthcare Quality and Management

Redesigning emergency department patient flows: application of Lean thinking to health care

King, Diane L, Ben‐Tovim, David I, Bassham, Jane·2006·Emergency Medicine Australasia

Abstract

Objective: To describe in some detail the methods used and outcome of an application of concepts from Lean Thinking in establishing streams for patient flows in a teaching general hospital ED. Methods: Detailed understanding was gained through process mapping with staff followed by the identification of value streams (those patients likely to be discharged from the ED, those who were likely to be admitted) and the implementation of a process of seeing those patients that minimized complex queuing in the ED. Results: Streaming had a significant impact on waiting times and total durations of stay in the ED. There was a general flattening of the waiting time across all groups. A slight increase in wait for Triage categories 2 and 3 patients was offset by reductions in wait for Triage category 4 patients. All groups of patients spent significantly less overall time in the department and the average number of patients in the ED at any time decreased. There was a significant reduction in number of patients who do not wait and a slight decrease in access block. Conclusions: The streaming of patients into groups of patients cared for by a specific team of doctors and nurses, and the minimizing of complex queues in this ED by altering the practices in relation to the function of the Australasian Triage Scale improved patient flow, thereby decreasing potential for overcrowding.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2006.00872.x

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lean implementation in reviewed emergency departments was associated with decreased proportion of patients leaving the emergency department without being seen.

    “Decreased proportion of patients leaving ED without being seen [ 72 ] [ 75 ] [ 76 ] [ 77 ] [ 81 ] [ 83 ]”

    From Lean Thinking in Emergency Departments: A Critical Review (2011) · cites this paper as [72]

  • Lean implementation in reviewed emergency departments was associated with decreased emergency department length of stay.

    “Decreased ED length of stay [ 72 ] [ 73 ] [ 75 ] [ 76 ] [ 79 ] [ 80 ] [ 81 ] [ 83 ] [ 85 ]”

    From Lean Thinking in Emergency Departments: A Critical Review (2011) · cites this paper as [72]

  • Lean implementation in reviewed emergency departments was associated with decreased waiting time to be seen.

    “Decreased waiting time to be seen [ 72 ] [ 77 ] [ 79 ] [ 80 ] [ 81 ]”

    From Lean Thinking in Emergency Departments: A Critical Review (2011) · cites this paper as [72]

  • In one reviewed study, there was no change in waiting time to see physician.

    “No change in waiting time to see physician [ 72 ]”

    From Lean Thinking in Emergency Departments: A Critical Review (2011) · cites this paper as [72]

  • In one reviewed study, there was decreased compliance with national waiting time recommendations for higher-acuity patients.

    “Decreased compliance with national waiting time recommendations for higher-acuity patients [ 72 ]”

    From Lean Thinking in Emergency Departments: A Critical Review (2011) · cites this paper as [72]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, D. L., Ben‐Tovim, D. I., & Bassham, J.
Affiliations
Flinders Medical Centre (AU)
Corresponding author
King, Diane L
Venue
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-06-29
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
391-397
ISSN
  • 1035-6851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-6731
  • 1742-6723
OpenAlex
W2132377426
Cited by
279
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 22
FWCI
9.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Emergency Medicine Australasia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
emergency department patient flow, lean thinking, process mapping, value stream, waiting time, length of hospital stay, triage, Australasian Triage Scale, access block, emergency department overcrowding, queueing
MeSH terms
Emergency Service, Hospital, Hospital Administration, Humans, Length of Stay, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Quality Assurance, Health Care, South Australia, Time Factors, Triage, Waiting Lists, Models, Organizational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review