Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 39

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Investigating Women's Preference for Sildenafil or Tadalafil Use by Their Partners with Erectile Dysfunction: The Partners' Preference Study

Conaglen, Helen M., Conaglen, John V.·2008·The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract

Introduction: Several preference studies comparing a short-acting with a longer-acting phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor have been conducted in men. Most men in those studies preferred tadalafil rather than sildenafil, and recent post hoc analysis of one study described several factors associated with men's treatment preference. No prospective studies have investigated the woman partners' preferences. Aim: To investigate the treatment preference of women who were partners of men using oral medications for erectile dysfunction (ED) in a single-center open-label crossover study. Methods: One hundred heterosexual couples in stable relationships, with male partners having ED based on the erectile function subscale of the International Index of Erectile Function, were randomly assigned to receive sildenafil or tadalafil for a 12-week phase, followed by another 12-week period using the alternate drug. Male and female participants completed sexual event diaries during both study phases, and the female participants were interviewed at baseline, midpoint, and end of study. Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcome data were the women's final interviews during which they were asked which drug they preferred and their reasons for that preference. Results: A total of 79.2% of the women preferred their partners' use of tadalafil, while 15.6% preferred sildenafil. Preference was not affected by age or treatment order randomization. Women preferring tadalafil reported feeling more relaxed, experiencing less pressure, and enjoying a more natural or spontaneous sexual experience as reasons for their choice. Mean number of tablets used, events recorded, events per week, and days between events were not significantly different during each study phase. Conclusion: Women's preferences were similar to men when using these two drugs. While the women's reasons for preferring tadalafil emphasized relaxed, satisfying, longer-lasting sexual experiences, those preferring sildenafil focused on satisfaction and drug effectiveness for their partner.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00774.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Fugl-Meyer, 1997, On life satisfaction in male erectile dysfunction, Int J Impot Res, 9, 141, 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900269 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Althof, 2006, Self-esteem, confidence, and relationships in men treated with sildenafil citrate for erectile dysfunction, J Gen Intern Med, 21, 1069, 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00554.x · DOI
  3. Cameron, 2005, Sexual and relationship characteristics among an internet-based sample of US men with and without erectile dysfunction, J Sex Marital Ther, 31, 229, 10.1080/00926230590513447 · DOI
  4. Matic, 2007, Relationship functioning, quality of life and masculinity among men with erectile dysfunction, Int J Impot Res, 19, 418, 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901566 · DOI
  5. Lowy, 2007, Quality of erection questionnaire correlates: Change in erection quality with erectile function, hardness, and psychosocial measures in men treated with sildenafil for erectile dysfunction, J Sex Med, 4, 83, 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00398.x · DOI
  6. Govier, 2003, A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover study of patient preference for tadalafil 20 mg or sildenafil citrate 50 mg during initiation of treatment for erectile dysfunction, Clin Ther, 25, 2709, 10.1016/S0149-2918(03)80328-4 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Ströberg, 2003, Switching patients with erectile dysfunction from sildenafil citrate to tadalafil: Results of a European multicenter, open-label study of patient preference, Clin Ther, 25, 2724, 10.1016/S0149-2918(03)80329-6 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Eardley, 2005, An open-label, multicentre, randomized, crossover study comparing sildenafil citrate and tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction in men naive to phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor therapy, BJU Int, 96, 1323, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05892.x · DOI
  9. Dean, 2006, Psychosocial outcomes and drug attributes affecting treatment choice in men receiving sildenafil citrate and tadalafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: Results of a multi-center, randomized, open-label, crossover study, J Sex Med, 3, 650, 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00261.x · DOI
  10. Eardley, 2007, Factors associated with preference for sildenafil citrate and tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction in men naïve to phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor therapy: Post hoc analysis of data from a multicentre, randomized, open-label, crossover study, BJU Int, 100, 122, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06916.x · DOI
  11. Riley, 2002, The role of the partner in erectile dysfunction and its treatment, Int J Impot Res, 14, S105, 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900800 · DOI
  12. Colson, 2005, Women faced with the problem of erectile dysfunction: Women's view on a male problem, Prog Urol, 15, 710
  13. Boisaubin, 2004, Prescribing, J Med Philos, 29, 739, 10.1080/03605310490883055 · DOI
  14. Althof, 2006, Through the eyes of women: The partners' perspective on tadalafil, J Urol, 68, 631, 10.1016/j.urology.2006.03.054 · DOI
  15. Tomlinson, 2004, Impact of erectile dysfunction and its subsequent treatment with sildenafil: Qualitative study, BMJ, 328, 1037, 10.1136/bmj.38044.662176.EE · DOI · Paper page
  16. Edwards, 2006, Vardenafil improves sexual function and treatment satisfaction in couples affected by erectile dysfunction (ED): A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in PDE5 inhibitor-naive men with ED and their partners, J Sex Med, 3, 1028, 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00329.x · DOI
  17. Lee, 2006, Physician-rated patient preference and patient- and partner-rated preference for tadalafil or sildenafil citrate: Results from the Canadian “Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction” observational study, BJU Int, 98, 623, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06384.x · DOI
  18. Rosen, 2006, Research instruments for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with erectile dysfunction, Urology, 68, 6, 10.1016/j.urology.2006.05.046 · DOI
  19. Mulhall, 2006, Erection hardness: A unifying factor for defining response in the treatment of erectile dysfunction, Urology, 68, 17, 10.1016/j.urology.2006.05.041 · DOI
  20. Mulhall, 2006, Evaluating preference trials of oral phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction, Eur Urol, 49, 30, 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.09.001 · DOI
  21. Ströberg, 2007, Is sex only for the healthy and wealthy?, J Sex Med, 4, 176, 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00233.x · DOI

Cited by

See all 39

Metadata

Authors
Conaglen, H. M., & Conaglen, J. V.
Affiliations
  • University of Waikato—Psychology , Hamilton , New Zealand
  • University of Auckland—Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences , Hamilton , New Zealand
Venue
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Published
2008-05-01
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
1198-1207
ISSN
  • 1743-6109
  • 1743-6095
Cited by
39
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.