The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO CONTENT VALIDITY1
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Based on Lawshe’s critical values, the minimum acceptable CVR threshold was determined according to panel size, with a cutoff value of 0.37 for the first Delphi round (N = 29) and 0.42 for the second round (N = 24) (49).”
From Identifying social media professionalism competencies in Vietnamese medical students: a modified Delphi method (2026) · cites this paper as [49]
In the citing paper
“Content validity will be quantitatively and qualitatively assessed by a panel of 10 specialists. The qualitative assessment will evaluate phrasing, wording, item relevance and placement. Quantitatively, the content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (CVI) will be calculated based on expert ratings.49”
From Determinants of the choice of delivery mode in pregnant women: a convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol (2026) · cites this paper as [49]
In the citing paper
“The final integrated framework-comprising 24 consensus components organized into seven domains, plus the AHP priority architecture-was subjected to expert content validity verification using Lawshe's [35] CVR.”
From Toward Sustainable AI Literacy in Higher Education: A Delphi–AHP Approach to Identifying Key Components of AI/Data Extracurricular Programs (2026) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“Consensus was determined using three indicators: (a) content validity ratio (CVR) [35] with a minimum threshold of 0.62 for a panel of 10 (i.e., at least nine panel members rating the item ≥ 4); (b) coefficient of variation (CV ≤ 0.5); and (c) degree of consensus (≥0.75 based on the interquartile range to upper quartile ratio).”
From Toward Sustainable AI Literacy in Higher Education: A Delphi–AHP Approach to Identifying Key Components of AI/Data Extracurricular Programs (2026) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“After assessing the linguistic validity of the tool, ensuring its content validity involved consulting five field experts on 11 items. These experts used the Lawshe [31] technique to rate each item as (1) removed/not relevant, (2) relevant but needing correction, or (3) very relevant/approved.”
From Turkish adaptation of the clinical reasoning evaluation simulation tool (CREST-TR): a validity and reliability study (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
Citations
Cites
Studies in Synthetic Validity. I. An exploratory investigation of clerical jobs
Lawshe, C. H., & STEINBERG, M. D. (1955) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1955.tb01208.x · Cited by 19
Self-citationSTATISTICAL THEORY AND PRACTICE IN APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY1
Lawshe, C. H. (1969) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1969.tb02294.x · Cited by 15
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Drauden G. M., 1974, A domain sampling approach to job approach analysis
- Mussio S. J., 1973, Content validity: A procedural manual
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,016 of 1,016
Tbaishat, D., Amoudi, G., & Elfadel, M. (2025) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100421 · Cited by 14
Hung, W.-H., Lin, C.-P., Tai, Y.-M., Ho, C.-F., & Jou, J.-J. (2014) · International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications · doi:10.1080/13675567.2013.837431 · Cited by 9
Plohl, N., Mlakar, I., Aquilino, L., Bisconti, P., & Smrke, U. (2025) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2384821 · Cited by 9
Herz, T. P., Hamel, F., Uebernickel, F., & Brenner, W. (2013) · International Journal of Accounting Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2012.12.003 · Cited by 8
Turkish Adaptation of the Four Facet Mindful Eating Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study
HAMURCU, P., KÖSE, G., ŞAHİN, İ. N., & ÇELİK, A. (2023) · Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Health Sciences · doi:10.5336/healthsci.2022-93286 · Cited by 8
The Persian version of the psychological flexibility in sport scale: a psychometric study
Badinlou, F., Badami, R., Reinebo, G., Jansson-Fröjmark, M., Sepehri, F., Molaviniya, S., & Lundgren, T. (2022) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-022-00962-x · Cited by 6
Persian version of the support and control in birth questionnaire among Iranian women
Ghanbari-Homaie, S., Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi, S., Asghari-Jafarabadi, M., Meedya, S., Mohammadi, E., & Mirghafourvand, M. (2023) · Journal of Education and Health Promotion · doi:10.4103/jehp.jehp_322_22 · Cited by 3
Bae, J.-S., Ko, K.-M., & Park, H.-J. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18168050 · Cited by 3
Development of the Artificial Intelligence Perception and Attitude Scale (AIPAS)
Dinler, H. (2025) · Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education · doi:10.14686/buefad.1602673 · Cited by 4
Woo, J. M., Tam, C. L., & Verghis, S. (2025) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100865 · Cited by 3
The binge scrolling scale measures excessive scrolling through a validated three-factor structure
Savci, M., Savci, H., Ugur, E., Zincirli, M., & Elhai, J. D. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-31861-x · Cited by 5
“In this process, we employed the technique proposed by Lawshe 39 .”
Dang, T. K. C., Yeh, B.-I., Park, Y. C., Hoang, B. B., Vinh, K., & Park, K. H. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1703842 · Cited by 1
Osouli-Tabrizi, S., Abdolalipour, S., Ahadi Yulgunloo, F., Maghalian, M., & Mirghafourvand, M. (2026) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-112693 · Cited by 1
Bayzat, C., & Dinc, L. (2025) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-025-03503-0 · Cited by 1
Güner Özer, M., & Belet Boyacı, Ş. D. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13677-4 · Cited by 1
(2014) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- LAWSHE, C. H.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Corresponding author
- LAWSHE, C. H.
- Venue
- Personnel Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1975-12
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 563-575
- ISSN
- 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6570
- OpenAlex
- W1998623504
- Cited by
- 7,313
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 996 · 2025: 1009 · 2024: 792 · 2023: 730 · 2022: 641 · 2021: 576 · 2020: 485 · 2019: 350 · 2018: 287 · 2017: 223 · 2016: 236 · 2015: 204 · 2014: 174 · 2013: 139 · 2012: 79
- FWCI
- 3.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personnel Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- content validity, test development, job analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
