Cited by 6Sport Psychology and PerformanceMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The Persian version of the psychological flexibility in sport scale: a psychometric study

Open access
Badinlou, Farzaneh, Badami, Rokhsareh, Reinebo, Gustaf, Jansson-Fröjmark, Markus, Sepehri, Fahimeh, Molaviniya, Shiva, Lundgren, Tobias·2022·BMC Psychology

Abstract

Background: There is a growing body of research suggesting that psychological flexibility (PF) is an important psychological construct related to psychological health and human performance. The Psychological Flexibility in Sport Scale (PFSS) is the first general scale to assess sport-related PF. So far, the PFSS has not yet been validated in other contexts than Sweden. Therefore, the current study sought to investigate a Persian version of the PFSS (P-PFSS) and extend the investigation of the psychometric properties of the PFSS in Iranian athletes. Methods: A total of 302 athletes from both team and individual sports (average age of 20.7 years, SD ± 7.5, 62.3% were female) were involved in the current study. Statistical analysis was performed on the data to test validity and reliability. The validity of the P-PFSS was tested through face and content validity, construct validity, criterion validity, and known-groups validity. The reliability of P-PFSS was verified through internal consistency and temporal stability of the scale. Results: Results revealed that validity of the P-PFSS was satisfactory. The instrument was determined to have strong face and content validity. With modifications, the confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the scale’s unidimensionality. The convergent validity of the P-PFSS was found to be acceptable (average variance extracted = 0.66) and satisfactory results were also found in the correlation matrix for the assessment of construct validity. The P-PFSS showed good criterion validity related to generic psychological flexibility and athletic-related variables. Also, the P-PFSS was able to differentiate PF between known groups. The P-PFSS was found to be reliable, with good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.92; composite reliability = 0.92) and temporal stability on retest (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.95). Conclusions: Overall, the Persian version of the PFSS showed good psychometric qualities in Iranian athletes. The current study provides additional support for the PFSS and extends the context-specific utility for practitioners and researchers in assessing sport-related PF.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40359-022-00962-x

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the original and Persian adaptations of SPEÖ, the relationship between psychological flexibility and depression and anxiety was examined.

    “SPEÖ'nün orijinalinde ve İ ran diline uyarlanan ölçekte, psikolojik esneklik kavram ı ile depresyon ve anksiyete aras ı ndaki ili ş ki incelenmi ş tir.”

    From The Psychological Flexibility Sport Scale: Adaptation, Validity and Reliability Study (2023) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Results (Criterion validity, Table 4; page not specified) report correlations between the Persian PFSS and both depression and anxiety, so the claim is supported for the Persian adaptation. The Introduction describes the original Swedish PFSS’s psychometric evaluation but does not establish that its relationship with depression and anxiety was examined. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [17]Mohammadbeigi A, Mohammadsalehi N, Aligol M. Validity and reliability of the instruments and types of measurments in health applied researches. Journal of rafsanjan university of medical sciences. 2015 Mar 10;13(12):1153-70.
  2. [35]Corner S. Choosing the right type of rotation in PCA and EFA. JALT testing & evaluation SIG newsletter. 2009;13:20 – 5.
  3. [48]Hanin YL. Coping with anxiety in sport. Coping in sport: Theory, methods, and related constructs. 2010;159:175.
  4. [51]Ruiz FJ A review of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) empirical evidence: Correlational, experimental psychopathology, component and outcome studies Int J Psychol Psychol 2010 10 125 62
  5. [60]DeGaetano JM. The role of psychological flexibility in injury rehabilitation. Doctoral dissertation, Kean University, 2014. Available from: https://www.proquest.com/openview/38a5d6443b34da030742040fb7d7d127/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Badinlou, F., Badami, R., Reinebo, G., Jansson-Fröjmark, M., Sepehri, F., Molaviniya, S., & Lundgren, T.
Affiliations
  • Region Stockholm (SE)
  • Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (IR)
Corresponding author
Badinlou, Farzaneh
Venue
BMC Psychology
Published
2022-11-04
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
250-250
ISSN
2050-7283 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4308211612
Cited by
6
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Karolinska Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
psychological flexibility, Persian translation, scale validation, athletes, psychometric properties, construct validity, reliability statistics, individual and team sports, Iranian athletes
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Iran, Male, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sports, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review