The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO CONTENT VALIDITY1
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Based on Lawshe’s critical values, the minimum acceptable CVR threshold was determined according to panel size, with a cutoff value of 0.37 for the first Delphi round (N = 29) and 0.42 for the second round (N = 24) (49).”
From Identifying social media professionalism competencies in Vietnamese medical students: a modified Delphi method (2026) · cites this paper as [49]
In the citing paper
“Content validity will be quantitatively and qualitatively assessed by a panel of 10 specialists. The qualitative assessment will evaluate phrasing, wording, item relevance and placement. Quantitatively, the content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (CVI) will be calculated based on expert ratings.49”
From Determinants of the choice of delivery mode in pregnant women: a convergent parallel mixed-methods study protocol (2026) · cites this paper as [49]
In the citing paper
“The final integrated framework-comprising 24 consensus components organized into seven domains, plus the AHP priority architecture-was subjected to expert content validity verification using Lawshe's [35] CVR.”
From Toward Sustainable AI Literacy in Higher Education: A Delphi–AHP Approach to Identifying Key Components of AI/Data Extracurricular Programs (2026) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“Consensus was determined using three indicators: (a) content validity ratio (CVR) [35] with a minimum threshold of 0.62 for a panel of 10 (i.e., at least nine panel members rating the item ≥ 4); (b) coefficient of variation (CV ≤ 0.5); and (c) degree of consensus (≥0.75 based on the interquartile range to upper quartile ratio).”
From Toward Sustainable AI Literacy in Higher Education: A Delphi–AHP Approach to Identifying Key Components of AI/Data Extracurricular Programs (2026) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“After assessing the linguistic validity of the tool, ensuring its content validity involved consulting five field experts on 11 items. These experts used the Lawshe [31] technique to rate each item as (1) removed/not relevant, (2) relevant but needing correction, or (3) very relevant/approved.”
From Turkish adaptation of the clinical reasoning evaluation simulation tool (CREST-TR): a validity and reliability study (2025) · cites this paper as [31]
Citations
Cites
Studies in Synthetic Validity. I. An exploratory investigation of clerical jobs
Lawshe, C. H., & STEINBERG, M. D. (1955) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1955.tb01208.x · Cited by 19
Self-citationSTATISTICAL THEORY AND PRACTICE IN APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY1
Lawshe, C. H. (1969) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1969.tb02294.x · Cited by 15
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Drauden G. M., 1974, A domain sampling approach to job approach analysis
- Mussio S. J., 1973, Content validity: A procedural manual
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149 · Cited by 5,925
Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations
Polit, D. F., Beck, C. T., & Owen, S. V. (2007) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.20199 · Cited by 5,273
MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/23044045 · Cited by 3,165
Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research
Straub, D., & Gefen, D. (2004) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.01324 · Cited by 2,797
Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods.
Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037//1040-3590.7.3.238 · Cited by 2,387
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)
Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544 · Cited by 2,202
Taherdoost, H. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3205040 · Cited by 2,047
Development and Validation of TQM Implementation Constructs
Ahire, S. L., Golhar, D. Y., & Waller, M. A. (1996) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00842.x · Cited by 1,769
Tsang, S., Royse, C., & Terkawi, A. (2017) · Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.4103/sja.sja_203_17 · Cited by 1,692
Structural Equation Modeling in Information Systems Research Using Partial Least Squares
Urbach, N., & Ahlemann, F. (2010) · The Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application · Cited by 1,659
Survey research in operations management: a process‐based perspective
Forza, C. (2002) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570210414310 · Cited by 1,615
Zamanzadeh, V., Ghahramanian, A., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., Alavi-Majd, H., & Nikanfar, A.-R. (2015) · Journal of Caring Sciences · doi:10.15171/jcs.2015.017 · Cited by 1,540
Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio
Ayre, C., & Scally, A. (2013) · Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development · doi:10.1177/0748175613513808 · Cited by 1,526
Firm's resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination
Ambulkar, S., Blackhurst, J., & Grawe, S. (2015) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2014.11.002 · Cited by 1,400
Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity
Almanasreh, E., Moles, R. J., & Chen, T. F. (2018) · Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066 · Cited by 1,550
A Psychometric Toolbox for Testing Validity and Reliability
DeVon, H. A., Block, M. E., Moyle‐Wright, P., Ernst, D. M., Hayden, S. J., Lazzara, D. J., Savoy, S. M., & Kostas‐Polston, E. (2007) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x · Cited by 1,889
Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study
Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa'deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004 · Cited by 1,350
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1991) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.732 · Cited by 1,038
Validation in Information Systems Research: A State-of-the-Art Assessment1
Boudreau, M., Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2001) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250956 · Cited by 958
Defining and Measuring Servant Leadership Behaviour in Organizations
Sendjaya, S., Sarros, J. C., & Santora, J. C. (2008) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00761.x · Cited by 844
Re-conceptualizing Information System Success: The IS-Impact Measurement Model
Gable, G. G., Sedera, D., & Chan, T. (2008) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00164 · Cited by 781
THE PRACTICE OF COMPETENCY MODELING
Schippmann, J. S., Ash, R. A., BATJTSTA, M., CARR, L., Eyde, L. D., Hesketh, B. L., KEHOE, J., Pearlman, K., Prien, E. P., & Sánchez, J. I. (2000) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00220.x · Cited by 743
Recalculation of the Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio
Wilson, F. R., Pan, W., & Schumsky, D. A. (2012) · Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development · doi:10.1177/0748175612440286 · Cited by 731
Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology
Anderson, N. R., Öneş, D. S., Sinangil, H. K., & Viswesvaran, C. (2001) · Sage eBooks · Cited by 632
Schriesheim, C. A., Powers, K. J., Scandura, T. A., Gardiner, C. C., & Lankau, M. J. (1993) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639301900208 · Cited by 558
Lindell, M. K., & Brandt, C. J. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.331 · Cited by 570
Employee Performance at Workplace: Conceptual Model and Empirical Validation
Pradhan, R. K., & Jena, L. K. (2016) · Business Perspectives and Research · doi:10.1177/2278533716671630 · Cited by 799
Metrics for explainable AI: challenges and prospects
Hoffman, R. R., Mueller, S. T., Klein, G., & Litman, J. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.04608 · Cited by 518
Cruchinho, P., López-Franco, M. D., Capelas, M. L., Almeida, S., Bennett, P. M., Miranda da Silva, M., Teixeira, G., Nunes, E., Lucas, P., & Gaspar, F. (2024) · Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare · doi:10.2147/jmdh.s419714 · Cited by 469
Recommendations for reporting the results of studies of instrument and scale development and testing
Streiner, D. L., & Kottner, J. (2014) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.12402 · Cited by 463
A methodology for construct development in MIS research
Lewis, B. R., Templeton, G. F., & Byrd, T. A. (2005) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000552 · Cited by 500
Lokuge, S., Sedera, D., Grover, V., & Xu, D. (2018) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2018.09.001 · Cited by 540
Rodrigues, I. B., Adachi, J. D., BEATTIE, K. A., & MacDermid, J. C. (2017) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12891-017-1914-5 · Cited by 456
The Construct of Content Validity
Sireci, S. G. (1998) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1023/a:1006985528729 · Cited by 430
Critical success factors influencing safety program performance in Thai construction projects
Aksorn, T., & Hadikusumo, B. H. W. (2007) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.006 · Cited by 437
An Analysis of Variance Approach to Content Validation
Hinkin, T. R., & Tracey, J. B. (1999) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442819922004 · Cited by 406
Social media as a complementary learning tool for teaching and learning: The case of youtube
Moghavvemi, S., Sulaiman, A. B., Jaafar, N. I., & Kasem, N. (2017) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2017.12.001 · Cited by 439
Validity of personnel decisions: A conceptual analysis of the inferential and evidential bases.
Binning, J. F., & Barrett, G. V. (1989) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.3.478 · Cited by 345
Colquitt, J. A., Sabey, T. B., Rodell, J. B., & Hill, E. T. (2019) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000406 · Cited by 378
Behavioural intention to adopt mobile wallet: a developing country perspective
Madan, K., & Yadav, R. (2016) · Journal of Indian Business Research · doi:10.1108/jibr-10-2015-0112 · Cited by 281
Musawir, A. U., Serra, C. E. M., Zwikael, O., & Ali, İ. (2017) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.007 · Cited by 382
Development and Initial Validation of the Classification of Early-Onset Scoliosis (C-EOS)
Williams, B. A., Matsumoto, H., McCalla, D. J., Akbarnia, B. A., Blakemore, L. C., Betz, R. R., Flynn, J. M. “., Johnston, C. E., McCarthy, R. E., Roye, D. P., et al. (2014) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.m.00253 · Cited by 316
Making Sense of Methods and Measurement: Lawshe's Content Validity Index
Gilbert, G. E., & Prion, S. K. (2016) · Clinical Simulation in Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2016.08.002 · Cited by 309
Interrater Agreement Reconsidered: An Alternative to the rwg Indices
Brown, R. D., & Hauenstein, N. M. A. (2005) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428105275376 · Cited by 299
Pedrosa, I., Suárez‐Álvarez, J., & Garcı́a-Cueto, E. (2014) · Acción Psicológica · doi:10.5944/ap.10.2.11820 · Cited by 331
VLAT: Development of a Visualization Literacy Assessment Test
Lee, S., Kim, S.-H., & Kwon, B. C. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2016.2598920 · Cited by 292
HYATT, D. E., & Ruddy, T. M. (1997) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00703.x · Cited by 291
Shuck, B., Adelson, J. L., & Reio, T. G. (2016) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21811 · Cited by 380
Development of a Measure for the Organizational Learning Construct
Templeton, G. F., Lewis, B. R., & Snyder, C. A. (2002) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2002.11045727 · Cited by 283
The Impact of Culturally Engaging Campus Environments on Sense of Belonging
Museus, S. D., Yi, V., & Saelua, N. A. (2016) · Review of higher education/The review of higher education · doi:10.1353/rhe.2017.0001 · Cited by 283
Measuring Trust in Human Robot Interactions: Development of the “ Trust Perception Scale-HRI ”
Schaefer, K. E. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7668-0_10 · Cited by 301
(2016) · Educational Technology & Society · Cited by 279
TARGET ARTICLES: "Seven Myths About Emotional Intelligence"
Matthews, G., Roberts, R. D., & Zeidner, M. (2004) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1503_01 · Cited by 304
Lin, T., Wu, S., Hsu, J. S., & Chou, Y.-C. (2012) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.04.004 · Cited by 284
Human Resource Training And Development
Latham, G. P. (1988) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.39.020188.002553 · Cited by 269
Content Validity of Assessment Instrument for Employee Engagement
Shrotryia, V. K., & Dhanda, U. (2019) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/2158244018821751 · Cited by 295
Ramos‐Villagrasa, P. J., Barrada, J. R., del Río, E. F., & Koopmans, L. (2019) · Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.5093/jwop2019a21 · Cited by 487
Leader–member social exchange (LMSX): Development and validation of a scale
Bernerth, J. B., Armenakis, A. A., Feild, H. S., Giles, W. F., & Walker, H. J. (2007) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.443 · Cited by 254
Unfried, A., Faber, M., Stanhope, D. S., & Wiebe, E. (2015) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/0734282915571160 · Cited by 257
Applied Psychometrics: The Steps of Scale Development and Standardization Process
Kyriazos, T. A., & Stalikas, A. (2018) · Psychology · doi:10.4236/psych.2018.911145 · Cited by 304
Observer ratings: Validity and value as a tool for animal welfare research
Meagher, R. K. (2009) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.026 · Cited by 264
Innovating with enterprise systems and digital platforms: A contingent resource-based theory view
Sedera, D., Lokuge, S., Grover, V., Sarker, S., & Sarker, S. (2016) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.01.001 · Cited by 246
User trust in social networking services: A comparison of Facebook and LinkedIn
Chang, S. E., Liu, A. Y., & Shen, W. C. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.013 · Cited by 248
You Want Me to Trust a ROBOT? The Development of a Human–Robot Interaction Trust Scale
Yagoda, R. E., & Gillan, D. (2012) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-012-0144-0 · Cited by 252
Brand personality appeal: conceptualization and empirical validation
Freling, T. H., Crosno, J. L., & Henard, D. H. (2010) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-010-0208-3 · Cited by 238
INDO AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Baru, P. C. R. (2014) · ADVANCED SCIENCES INDEX · Cited by 236
Simons, L. E., Sieberg, C. B., Carpino, E., Logan, D., & Berde, C. (2011) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2010.12.008 · Cited by 235
Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışmalarında Kullanılan Kapsam Geçerliği İçin Bir Yol Haritası
Yeşilyurt, S., & Çapraz, C. (2018) · Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.17556/erziefd.297741 · Cited by 235
Božič, K., & Dimovski, V. (2019) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2019.101578 · Cited by 254
Reeve, E., Low, L., Shakib, S., & Hilmer, S. N. (2016) · Drugs & Aging · doi:10.1007/s40266-016-0410-1 · Cited by 217
Intelligence and job performance: Economic and social implications.
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1996) · Psychology Public Policy and Law · doi:10.1037/1076-8971.2.3-4.447 · Cited by 225
Constructing a Bayesian network model for improving safety behavior of employees at workplaces
Mohammadfam, I., Ghasemi, F., Kalatpour, O., & Moghimbeigi, A. (2016) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.006 · Cited by 215
The Measurement of Employee Well-being: Development and Validation of a Scale
Pradhan, R. K., & Hati, L. (2019) · Global Business Review · doi:10.1177/0972150919859101 · Cited by 294
University student’s engagement: development of the University Student Engagement Inventory (USEI)
Marôco, J. P., Marôco, A. L., Campos, J. Á. D. B., & Fredricks, J. A. (2016) · Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica · doi:10.1186/s41155-016-0042-8 · Cited by 213
Role conflict and role ambiguity: A critical assessment of construct validity.
King, L. A., & King, D. W. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.48 · Cited by 302
The project manager core competencies to project success
Alvarenga, J. C., Branco, R. R., Guedes, A. L. A., Soares, C. A. P., & Silva, W. D. S. E. (2019) · International Journal of Managing Projects in Business · doi:10.1108/ijmpb-12-2018-0274 · Cited by 208
Stress and burnout in health care workers during COVID-19 pandemic: validation of a questionnaire
Talaee, N., Varahram, M., Jamaati, H., Salimi, A., Attarchi, M., Dizaji, M. K., Sadr, M., Hassani, S., Farzanegan, B., Monjazebi, F., et al. (2020) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1007/s10389-020-01313-z · Cited by 208
Statistical and judgmental criteria for scale purification
Wieland, A., Durach, C. F., Kembro, J. H., & Treiblmaier, H. (2017) · Supply Chain Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-07-2016-0230 · Cited by 220
Johnston, A. C., Worrell, J. L. “., Gangi, P. M. D., & Wasko, M. M. (2013) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-02-2013-0040 · Cited by 222
Flores, L. G. R., Zheng, W., Rau, D., & Thomas, C. H. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310384631 · Cited by 203
Odugbesan, J. A., Aghazadeh, S., Al-Qaralleh, R. E., & Sogeke, O. S. (2022) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-08-2021-0601 · Cited by 227
Content Validity—The Source of My Discontent
Guion, R. M. (1977) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167700100103 · Cited by 200
An empirical comparison of statistical construct validation approaches
Ahire, S. L., & Devaraj, S. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/17.946530 · Cited by 194
Taherdoost, H. (2018) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2018.1427793 · Cited by 224
Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal ®
Glaser, E. M. (2008) · Cited by 192
Proposed managerial competencies for Industry 4.0 – Implications for social sustainability
Shet, S. V., & Pereira, V. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121080 · Cited by 205
Development of a survey instrument to examine consumer adoption of broadband
Dwivedi, Y. K., Choudrie, J., & Brinkman, W. (2006) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/02635570610666458 · Cited by 181
Cultural similarities and differences in medical professionalism: a multi‐region study
Chandratilake, M. N., McAleer, S., & Gibson, J. A. G. (2012) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04153.x · Cited by 183
Change fatigue: Development and initial validation of a new measure
Bernerth, J. B., Walker, H. J., & Harris, S. G. (2011) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678373.2011.634280 · Cited by 183
Kim, M., Jang, Y.-C., & Lee, S. (2013) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.049 · Cited by 178
Choe, J. Y., & Kim, S. (2018) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.07.004 · Cited by 181
Davis, F. D., Riedl, R., & Hevner, A. R. (2014) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00377 · Cited by 176
Content Validity Using a Mixed Methods Approach
Newman, I., Lim, J. M., & Pineda, F. (2013) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/1558689813476922 · Cited by 222
Dimitratos, P., Voudouris, I., Plakoyiannaki, E., & Nakos, G. E. (2011) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.08.001 · Cited by 170
Navaratnam, S., Satheeskumar, A., Zhang, G., Nguyen, K. T. Q., Venkatesan, S., & Poologanathan, K. (2022) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103935 · Cited by 173
Huang, S., Ou, C.-S., Chen, C.-M., & Lin, B. (2005) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.06.013 · Cited by 167
Koller, I., Levenson, M. R., & Glück, J. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00126 · Cited by 169
How leadership matters in organizational innovation: a perspective of openness
Xiao, J., Chen, J., Mei, L., & Wu, Q. (2017) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-04-2017-0415 · Cited by 180
Butler, A. B., & Skattebo, A. L. (2004) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/0963179042596478 · Cited by 161
Chiner, E., & Moltó, M. C. C. (2012) · International Journal of Inclusive Education · doi:10.1080/13603116.2012.689864 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- LAWSHE, C. H.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Corresponding author
- LAWSHE, C. H.
- Venue
- Personnel Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1975-12
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 563-575
- ISSN
- 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6570
- OpenAlex
- W1998623504
- Cited by
- 7,313
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 996 · 2025: 1009 · 2024: 792 · 2023: 730 · 2022: 641 · 2021: 576 · 2020: 485 · 2019: 350 · 2018: 287 · 2017: 223 · 2016: 236 · 2015: 204 · 2014: 174 · 2013: 139 · 2012: 79
- FWCI
- 3.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personnel Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- content validity, test development, job analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review