Cited by 324Psychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and AssessmentEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

MOTIVATIONAL COMPONENTS OF TEST TAKING

ARVEY, RICHARD D., STRICKLAND, WILLIAM, DRAUDEN, GAIL, MARTIN, CLESSEN·1990·Personnel Psychology

Abstract

The first phase of this research effort describes an effort to directly measure the attitudes and opinions of employment test takers toward the tests they just took; the instrument is called the Test Attitude Survey (TAS). Nine factors were developed which reflect test takers' expressed effort and motivation on the test, the degree of concentration, perceived test ease, and the like. Several studies were conducted showing that TAS factors were significantly sensitive to differences in test types and administration permitting the inference that the TAS possessed construct validity. The second phase of this study tested several propositions and hypotheses. In one study, it is shown that the applicants report significantly higher effort and motivation on the employment tests compared to incumbents, even when ability is held constant. A second study showed that a small but significant relationship exists between TAS factor scores, test performances, and the person factors. Moreover, some of the racial differences on test performances can be accounted for via the TAS factor scores; it is observed that after holding these TAS factors constant, racial differences on the employment tests scores diminished. In a third study, very limited evidence was found for the incremental and moderating effects of these attitudes, but there were several limitations to the study associated with small sample sizes, unknown reliabilities in the criterion scales, and so forth. Discussion focussed on t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb00679.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ARVEY, R. D., STRICKLAND, W., DRAUDEN, G., & MARTIN, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • United States Air Force (US)
  • United States Department of the Navy (US)
Corresponding author
ARVEY, RICHARD D.
Venue
Personnel Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-12
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
695-716
ISSN
  • 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-6570
OpenAlex
W2087095639
Cited by
324
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 24
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personnel Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
test-taking motivation, employment testing, test effort, test concentration, construct validity, incremental validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review