The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THEORY TESTING: COMBINING PSYCHOMETRIC META‐ANALYSIS AND STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS MODELING
Abstract
This paper presents an overview of a useful approach for theory testing in the social sciences that combines the principles of psychometric meta‐analysis and structural equations modeling. In this approach to theory testing, the estimated true score correlations between the constructs of interest are established through the application of meta‐analysis (Hunter & Schmidt, 1990), and structural equations modeling is then applied to the matrix of estimated true score correlations. The potential advantages and limitations of this approach are presented. The approach enables researchers to test complex theories involving several constructs that cannot all be measured in a single study. Decision points are identified, the options available to a researcher are enumerated, and the potential problems as well as the prospects of each are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We computed harmonic mean sample size (Viswesvaran & Ones, 1995) when conducting hierarchical multiple regression analyses because sample sizes differed across the cells in the meta-analytically derived correlation matrices.Computing harmonic mean sample size will yield more conservative estimates because less weight is given to large samples (Garrett, Miao, Qian, & Bae, 2017;Miao, Coombs, Qian, &”
From A cross-cultural meta-analysis of how leader emotional intelligence influences subordinate task performance and organizational citizenship behavior (2018) · cites this paper as Viswesvaran & Ones, 1995
In the citing paper
“A major advantage of this technique is that not all relationships specified by the theory need to be examined in each primary study, as the population correlations required can be meta-analytically computed (Joseph et al. 2007; Viswesvaran and Ones 1998).”
From Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model (2019) · cites this paper as Viswesvaran and Ones 1998
In the citing paper
“Prior literature suggests various possibilities such as using the minimum sample size, average sample size and harmonic mean sample size (e.g., Tett and Meyer 1993; Viswesvaran and Ones 1998).”
From Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model (2019) · cites this paper as Viswesvaran and Ones 1998
Citations
Cites
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
Research in Organizational Behavior.
Grimes, A. J., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392975 · Cited by 11,303
Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-5278 · Cited by 5,483
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Ghosh, S., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1988) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269814 · Cited by 4,730
Essentials of Psychological Testing
Rosner, B., & Cronbach, L. J. (1960) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419921 · Cited by 4,524
Cohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings.
Raudenbush, S. W., Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1991) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289738 · Cited by 2,368
Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies.
Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1977) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.32.9.752 · Cited by 2,154
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.12.1181 · Cited by 2,033
Personnel Selection in Organizations
Murphy, K. R., Schmitt, N., & Borman, W. C. (1993) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258598 · Cited by 1,646
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Bentler PM, 1989, Theory and implementation of EQS: A structural equations program [Computer software]
- Burke MJ, 1994, An empirical estimation of the effect of second order sampling error on ASVAB‐training proficiency validity estimates
- Jensen AR, 1980, Bias in mental testing
- Jöreskog KG, 1986, LISREL 6 user's guide: Analysis of linear shuctural relationships by the method of muximum likelihood
- Nunnally JC, 1978, Psychometric theory
- Oakes M., 1986, Statistical inference: A commentary for the social and behavioral sciences
- OnesDS. (1993).The construct validity of integriy tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of Iowa Iowa City.
- SchmidtFL. (in press).Quantitative methods and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for the training of researchers.Psychological Methods.
- SchmidtFL HunterJE. (in press).Measurement error in industrial/organizational psychology research: Lessons from 26 research scenarios.Psychological Methods.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 929
Bednall, T. C., Sanders, K., & Yang, H. (2021) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.22068 · Cited by 49
[Mobbing: a meta-analysis and integrative model of its antecedents and consequences].
Topa, G., Depolo, M., & Domínguez, J. F. M. (2007) · PubMed · Cited by 48
Tang, L., & Jiang, J. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141168 · Cited by 52
A Conceptual and Empirical Review of the Structure of Assessment Center Dimensions
Meriac, J. P., Hoffman, B. J., & Woehr, D. J. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314522299 · Cited by 53
Roh, H., Chun, K., Ryou, Y., & Son, J. (2018) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601118799475 · Cited by 42
A meta-analysis of teacher language practices in early childhood classrooms
Hadley, E. B., Barnes, E. M., Wiernik, B. M., & Raghavan, M. (2022) · Early Childhood Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.12.002 · Cited by 59
Zhai, X., Zhu, C. J., & Zhang, M. M. (2022) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12411 · Cited by 65
The intention to use cryptocurrency: A meta-analysis of what we know
Bommer, W. H., Milevoj, E., & Rana, S. (2022) · Emerging Markets Review · doi:10.1016/j.ememar.2022.100962 · Cited by 64
Kim, M., Ma, E., & Wang, L. (2022) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103356 · Cited by 50
Pletzer, J. L., Breevaart, K., & Bakker, A. B. (2023) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/20413866231197519 · Cited by 70
Geiger, M. W. (2020) · Journal of Business Venturing Insights · doi:10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00167 · Cited by 45
The tripartite model of intrinsic motivation in education: A 30‐year retrospective and meta‐analysis
Howard, J. L., Chong, J. X. Y., & Bureau, J. S. (2020) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12570 · Cited by 56
Ma, E., Wang, D., Liang, W., & Liu, A. (2021) · Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research · doi:10.1177/10963480211019104 · Cited by 55
Applications of Meta-Analysis for Marketing and Public Policy: A Review
Franke, G. R. (2001) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1509/jppm.20.2.186.17373 · Cited by 45
Baumeister, V. M., Kuen, L., Bruckes, M., & Schewe, G. (2021) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440211061560 · Cited by 65
Vieira, V. A., Wolter, J. S., Araújo, C. F., & Frio, R. S. (2022) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2022.09.002 · Cited by 48
Carpenter, N. C., Son, J., Harris, T. B., Alexander, A. L., & Horner, M. T. (2016) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428116639132 · Cited by 44
Cheung, M. W. ‐. (2018) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000284 · Cited by 43
Incorporating Job Demand Variability Into Job Demands Theory: A Meta-Analysis
Downes, P. E., Reeves, C. J., McCormick, B. W., Boswell, W. R., & Butts, M. M. (2020) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320916767 · Cited by 60
Job Performance: Assessment Issues in Personnel Selection
Viswesvaran, C., & Öneş, D. S. (2017) · doi:10.1002/9781405164221.ch16 · Cited by 43
Self-citationKnowledge Hiding in Organizations: Meta-Analysis 10 Years Later
Škerlavaj, M., Černe, M., & Batistič, S. (2023) · Economic and business review · doi:10.15458/2335-4216.1319 · Cited by 52
Validation Is Like Motor Oil: Synthetic Is Better
JOHNSON, J., Steel, P., Scherbaum, C. A., Hoffman, C. C., Jeanneret, P. R., & Foster, J. L. (2010) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2010.01245.x · Cited by 42
Usage intention model of mobile apps in membership application
Huang, D.-H., & Chueh, H.-E. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.062 · Cited by 41
A meta-analysis of team reflexivity: Antecedents, outcomes, and boundary conditions
Leblanc, P., Harvey, J., & Rousseau, V. (2024) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2024.101042 · Cited by 56
Ng, T. W. H., Yim, F. H., Chen, H., & Zou, Y. (2022) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063221125143 · Cited by 72
An Empirical Assessment of Meta-Analytic Practice
Dieckmann, N. F., Malle, B. F., & Bodner, T. (2009) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015107 · Cited by 40
Classifying Correlation Matrices Into Relatively Homogeneous Subgroups: A Cluster Analytic Approach
Cheung, M. W. ‐., & Chan, W. (2005) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164404273946 · Cited by 39
Does rater personality matter? A meta‐analysis of rater Big Five–performance rating relationships
Harari, M. B., Rudolph, C. W., & Laginess, A. J. (2014) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12086 · Cited by 43
Information system users’ creativity
Pacauskas, D., & Rajala, R. (2017) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-04-2015-0090 · Cited by 44
Meta-Analyzing Apples and Oranges: How to Make Applesauce Instead of Fruit Salad
Carpenter, C. J. (2019) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/hqz018 · Cited by 40
Meta-analysis in finance research: Opportunities, challenges, and contemporary applications
Geyer‐Klingeberg, J., Hang, M., & Rathgeber, A. (2020) · International Review of Financial Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101524 · Cited by 41
Roth, P. L., Switzer, F. S., Iddekinge, C. H. V., & Oh, I. (2011) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01231.x · Cited by 44
Liao, M., Zhang, M. J., Carnevale, J. B., Huang, C., & Wang, L. (2024) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063241239298 · Cited by 42
Combining Correlation Matrices: Simulation Analysis of Improved Fixed-Effects Methods
Hafdahl, A. R. (2007) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.3102/1076998606298041 · Cited by 37
Retirement and Wealth Relationships
Topa, G., Moriano, J. A., Depolo, M., de la Hera, C. M. A., & Moreno, A. M. (2011) · Research on Aging · doi:10.1177/0164027511410549 · Cited by 36
Fitting identity in the reasoned action framework: A meta-analysis and model comparison
Paquin, R. S., & Keating, D. M. (2017) · Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2016.1152217 · Cited by 37
The general factor of personality and job performance: Revisiting previous meta‐analyses
Pelt, D. H. M., van der Linden, D., Dunkel, C. S., & Born, M. P. (2017) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12188 · Cited by 44
“I Want to Be Like You!”: The Influence of Role Models on Entrepreneurial Intention
Fellnhofer, K., & Mueller, S. (2018) · Journal of Enterprising Culture · doi:10.1142/s021849581850005x · Cited by 29
Sur, M. H., Jung, J., & Shapiro, D. R. (2021) · Disability and health journal · doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101199 · Cited by 37
Meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM): new tricks of the trade
Steinmetz, H., & Block, J. (2022) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-022-00293-6 · Cited by 38
Li, J., Li, Y., Lv, R., Kuang, J., Zhou, K., & Xu, M. (2022) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-022-03225-9 · Cited by 40
Antecedents of Workplace Safety Behavior: Meta-Analysis in the Construction Industry
Xia, N., Griffin, M. A., Xie, Q., & Hu, X. (2023) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/jcemd4.coeng-12492 · Cited by 43
Boer, D., Deinert, A., Homan, A. C., & Voelpel, S. C. (2016) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2016.1170007 · Cited by 36
Experiential learning, M&A performance, and post-acquisition integration strategy: A meta-analysis
Schweizer, L., Wang, L., Koscher, E. M. K., & Michaelis, B. (2022) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2022.102212 · Cited by 36
Newman, D. A., Jacobs, R. R., & Bartram, D. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1394 · Cited by 41
Pajic, S., Buengeler, C., Hartog, D. N. D., & Boer, D. (2021) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/ocp0000309 · Cited by 42
Feedback environment: A meta‐analysis
Katz, I. M., Rauvola, R. S., & Rudolph, C. W. (2021) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12350 · Cited by 43
Webster, J. R., & Adams, G. A. (2019) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678373.2019.1662855 · Cited by 36
Gonzalez-Mule, E. N., Carter, K. M., & Mount, M. K. (2017) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2017.01.003 · Cited by 39
Conceptualizing speech anxiety as a dynamic trait
Behnke, R. R., & Sawyer, C. R. (1998) · Southern Communication Journal · doi:10.1080/10417949809373086 · Cited by 34
Entrepreneurial spawning and knowledge-based perspective: A meta-analysis
Garrett, R. P., Miao, C., Qian, S., & Bae, T. J. (2017) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-017-9842-1 · Cited by 33
Meta-Analysis and the Myth of Generalizability
Tett, R. P., Hundley, N. A., & Christiansen, N. D. (2017) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/iop.2017.26 · Cited by 34
Vagnani, G., Gatti, C., & Proietti, L. (2019) · Journal of Management & Governance · doi:10.1007/s10997-019-09452-6 · Cited by 40
Yang, W., & Li, C. (2021) · Acta Psychologica Sinica · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1041.2021.00527 · Cited by 34
Pletzer, J. L., Thielmann, I., & Zettler, I. (2023) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1177/08902070231174574 · Cited by 39
Self‐quantification and consumer well‐being: A meta‐analytic review
Jain, A., Pradhan, D., Kuanr, A., & Singh, S. (2024) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.22141 · Cited by 36
Meta-analyses in sales research
Johnson, J. S., & Jaramillo, F. (2017) · Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management · doi:10.1080/08853134.2017.1286596 · Cited by 31
A meta-analysis of green and sustainable business models: A comprehensive approach
Mondal, S., Singh, S., & Gupta, H. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133623 · Cited by 37
Ebrahimi, S., Ghasemaghaei, M., & Benbasat, I. (2022) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2022.2096549 · Cited by 37
de Ribera, O. S., Kavish, N., Katz, I. M., & Boutwell, B. B. (2019) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2207 · Cited by 34
Special issue on meta‐analytic structural equation modeling: introduction from the guest editors
Cheung, M. W. ‐., & Hafdahl, A. R. (2016) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1212 · Cited by 32
Paradoxical leadership: a meta-analytical review
Lee, A., Lyubovnikova, J., Zheng, Y., & Li, Z. F. (2023) · Frontiers in Organizational Psychology · doi:10.3389/forgp.2023.1229543 · Cited by 41
Chen, Y., Huang, Z.-L., & Chu, H.-C. (2024) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-024-02167-w · Cited by 66
Arrfelt, M., Mannor, M. J., Nahrgang, J. D., & Christensen, A. L. (2016) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-016-0225-9 · Cited by 33
Ke, Z., Zhang, Q., & Tong, X. (2018) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2018.1530059 · Cited by 33
Sharma, S., Elfenbein, H. A., Sinha, R., & Bottom, W. P. (2020) · Human Performance · doi:10.1080/08959285.2020.1783667 · Cited by 33
Horstmeier, C. A. L., Boer, D., Homan, A. C., & Voelpel, S. C. (2016) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12160 · Cited by 33
Geiger, M., & Moore, K. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107061 · Cited by 30
Foerstl, K. D., Franke, H., & Zimmermann, F. (2016) · Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management · doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2016.08.001 · Cited by 31
Chiaburu, D. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2008) · Cited by 30
Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling
Cheung, M. W. ‐. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.225 · Cited by 33
Fu, H., He, W., Feng, K., Guo, X., & Hou, C. (2023) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2023.12.005 · Cited by 34
He, G., Chen, S. H. A., Lin, H., & Su, A. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09922-w · Cited by 43
Fixed-Effects Meta-Analyses as Multiple-Group Structural Equation Models
Cheung, M. W. ‐. (2010) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705511.2010.489367 · Cited by 29
Vieira, V. A., Liu, R. L., & de Mello, V. G. (2021) · The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/10696679.2021.2004379 · Cited by 31
A meta-analytic examination of the antecedents explaining the intention to use fintech
Bommer, W. H., Milevoj, E., & Rana, S. (2022) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-03-2022-0170 · Cited by 31
Rubenstein, A. L., Zhang, Y., Ma, K., Morrison, H. M., & Jorgensen, D. F. (2019) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2019.02.002 · Cited by 31
A synthetic validity approach to testing differential prediction hypotheses.
JOHNSON, J., Carter, G. W., Davison, H. K., & Oliver, D. H. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.774 · Cited by 29
Li, X., Ling, C., & Zhu, J. (2024) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-024-09987-9 · Cited by 51
Conflict and performance in channels: a meta-analysis
Eshghi, K., & Ray, S. (2020) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-020-00751-1 · Cited by 28
Fifteen Years of Research on Customer Loyalty Formation: A Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Model
So, K. K. F., Yang, Y., & Li, X. (2024) · Cornell Hospitality Quarterly · doi:10.1177/19389655241276506 · Cited by 40
Hu, D., Oh, I., & Agolli, A. (2025) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.22309 · Cited by 38
Prior and future withdrawal and performance: A meta-analysis of their relations in panel studies
Swider, B. W., & Zimmerman, R. D. (2014) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2014.01.004 · Cited by 34
La méthodologie de la méta-analyse en marketing
Laroche, P., & Soulez, S. (2012) · Recherche et Applications en Marketing (French Edition) · doi:10.1177/076737011202700104 · Cited by 28
Michel, J. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Thomas, J. P. (2011) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.47 · Cited by 27
Self-citationFormal salesforce controls and revenue production: a meta-analysis
Samaraweera, M., & Gelb, B. D. (2014) · Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management · doi:10.1080/08853134.2014.977796 · Cited by 27
A tutorial on the meta-analytic structural equation modeling of reliability coefficients.
Scherer, R., & Teo, T. P. (2020) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000261 · Cited by 29
Environmental uncertainty and forward integration in marketing: theory and meta‐analysis
Cadeaux, J. M., & Ng, A. (2012) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090561211189202 · Cited by 27
Bradley, K. M., & Hauenstein, N. M. A. (2006) · Psychology science · Cited by 27
A Meta-analysis of Attachment at Work
Warnock, K., Ju, C. S., & Katz, I. M. (2024) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-024-09960-9 · Cited by 28
The Role of Augmented and Virtual Reality in Shaping Retail Marketing: A Meta-Analysis
Fan, X., Xun, J., Dolega, L., & Xiong, L. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17020728 · Cited by 38
Alamolhoda, M., Ayatollahi, S. M. T., & Bagheri, Z. (2017) · BMC Research Notes · doi:10.1186/s13104-017-2768-5 · Cited by 26
Maldonado, T., Salaiz, A., Vera, D. M., & Keller, R. T. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2018.2817388 · Cited by 29
Westrick, P. A., Schmidt, F. L., Le, H., Robbins, S. B., & Radunzel, J. (2020) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1080/10627197.2020.1848423 · Cited by 32
How does mHealth service quality influences adoption?
Li, Y., Liu, R., Wang, J., & Zhao, T. (2022) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-12-2020-0758 · Cited by 31
Relationships of leader reward behavior with employee behavior
Jackson, E., Rossi, M. E., Hoover, E. R., & Johnson, R. E. (2012) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/01437731211265232 · Cited by 26
A “Tower of Babel”? – interrelations and structure of leadership constructs
Rowold, J., Borgmann, L., & Diebig, M. (2015) · Leadership & Organization Development Journal · doi:10.1108/lodj-01-2013-0009 · Cited by 30
Yu, H., Dong, Z., Guan, X., Chang-li, Y., Su, X., & Cheng, L. (2022) · Journal of Career Assessment · doi:10.1177/10690727221106069 · Cited by 28
Zhang, Z., Han, F., Luan, Y., Chen, Q., & Peng, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.979412 · Cited by 38
Lowry, P. B., Moody, G. D., Parameswaran, S., & Brown, N. J. (2023) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2023.2267318 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- VISWESVARAN, C., & ONES, D. S.
- Affiliations
- Florida International University (US)
- Corresponding author
- VISWESVARAN, CHOCKALINGAM
- Venue
- Personnel Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 865-885
- ISSN
- 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6570
- OpenAlex
- W2051295428
- Cited by
- 926
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 36
- FWCI
- 7.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personnel Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Keywords
- theory testing, structural equation modeling, complex theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review