The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THEORY TESTING: COMBINING PSYCHOMETRIC META‐ANALYSIS AND STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS MODELING
Abstract
This paper presents an overview of a useful approach for theory testing in the social sciences that combines the principles of psychometric meta‐analysis and structural equations modeling. In this approach to theory testing, the estimated true score correlations between the constructs of interest are established through the application of meta‐analysis (Hunter & Schmidt, 1990), and structural equations modeling is then applied to the matrix of estimated true score correlations. The potential advantages and limitations of this approach are presented. The approach enables researchers to test complex theories involving several constructs that cannot all be measured in a single study. Decision points are identified, the options available to a researcher are enumerated, and the potential problems as well as the prospects of each are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We computed harmonic mean sample size (Viswesvaran & Ones, 1995) when conducting hierarchical multiple regression analyses because sample sizes differed across the cells in the meta-analytically derived correlation matrices.Computing harmonic mean sample size will yield more conservative estimates because less weight is given to large samples (Garrett, Miao, Qian, & Bae, 2017;Miao, Coombs, Qian, &”
From A cross-cultural meta-analysis of how leader emotional intelligence influences subordinate task performance and organizational citizenship behavior (2018) · cites this paper as Viswesvaran & Ones, 1995
In the citing paper
“A major advantage of this technique is that not all relationships specified by the theory need to be examined in each primary study, as the population correlations required can be meta-analytically computed (Joseph et al. 2007; Viswesvaran and Ones 1998).”
From Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model (2019) · cites this paper as Viswesvaran and Ones 1998
In the citing paper
“Prior literature suggests various possibilities such as using the minimum sample size, average sample size and harmonic mean sample size (e.g., Tett and Meyer 1993; Viswesvaran and Ones 1998).”
From Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model (2019) · cites this paper as Viswesvaran and Ones 1998
Citations
Cites
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
Research in Organizational Behavior.
Grimes, A. J., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392975 · Cited by 11,303
Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-5278 · Cited by 5,483
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Ghosh, S., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1988) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269814 · Cited by 4,730
Essentials of Psychological Testing
Rosner, B., & Cronbach, L. J. (1960) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419921 · Cited by 4,524
Cohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings.
Raudenbush, S. W., Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1991) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289738 · Cited by 2,368
Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies.
Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1977) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.32.9.752 · Cited by 2,154
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.12.1181 · Cited by 2,033
Personnel Selection in Organizations
Murphy, K. R., Schmitt, N., & Borman, W. C. (1993) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258598 · Cited by 1,646
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Bentler PM, 1989, Theory and implementation of EQS: A structural equations program [Computer software]
- Burke MJ, 1994, An empirical estimation of the effect of second order sampling error on ASVAB‐training proficiency validity estimates
- Jensen AR, 1980, Bias in mental testing
- Jöreskog KG, 1986, LISREL 6 user's guide: Analysis of linear shuctural relationships by the method of muximum likelihood
- Nunnally JC, 1978, Psychometric theory
- Oakes M., 1986, Statistical inference: A commentary for the social and behavioral sciences
- OnesDS. (1993).The construct validity of integriy tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of Iowa Iowa City.
- SchmidtFL. (in press).Quantitative methods and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for the training of researchers.Psychological Methods.
- SchmidtFL HunterJE. (in press).Measurement error in industrial/organizational psychology research: Lessons from 26 research scenarios.Psychological Methods.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature.
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698 · Cited by 7,592
Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425 · Cited by 5,942
Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.12.1.1 · Cited by 4,711
Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Meta-Analytic Test of Their Relative Validity.
Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755 · Cited by 4,464
Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002 · Cited by 4,140
Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review
Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.765 · Cited by 3,190
Crawford, E. R., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0019364 · Cited by 3,335
CHRISTIAN, M. S., GARZA, A. S., & SLAUGHTER, J. E. (2011) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x · Cited by 2,903
Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524 · Cited by 2,616
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909 · Cited by 2,606
On the Functional Properties of Perceived Self-Efficacy Revisited
Bandura, A. (2012) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311410606 · Cited by 2,586
Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Hu, J. J., & Baer, J. C. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0088 · Cited by 2,871
Lepine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & Lepine, M. A. (2005) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2005.18803921 · Cited by 2,438
Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013079 · Cited by 2,356
Perceived organizational support: a meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory.
Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2017) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206315575554 · Cited by 2,354
Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332 · Cited by 2,303
Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis.
Judge, T. A., Heller, D., & Mount, M. K. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.530 · Cited by 2,164
Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2019) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y · Cited by 2,137
Combs, J. G., Liu, Y., Hall, A. T., & Ketchen, D. J. (2006) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00045.x · Cited by 2,208
Self-Determination Theory Applied to Health Contexts: A Meta-Analysis
Ng, J. Y. Y., Ntoumanis, N., Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C., Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Duda, J. L., & Williams, G. C. (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612447309 · Cited by 1,959
“Path analysis and meta-analysis can complement each other (Viswesvaran & Ones, 1995) because path analysis captures interdependencies between several variables, whereas meta-analysis can only examine the relation of two variables at a time.”
MethodPodsakoff, N. P., LePine, J. A., & LePine, M. A. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.438 · Cited by 1,948
A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour—A meta-analysis
Klöckner, C. A. (2013) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.014 · Cited by 1,773
Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: A meta-analysis.
Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., Fishbein, M., & Muellerleile, P. A. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.142 · Cited by 1,806
Bae, T. J., Qian, S., Miao, C., & Fiet, J. O. (2014) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/etap.12095 · Cited by 2,033
The Big Five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytical review.
Zhao, H., & Seibert, S. E. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.259 · Cited by 1,745
Emotional intelligence: An integrative meta-analysis and cascading model
Joseph, D. L., & Newman, D. A. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017286 · Cited by 1,722
Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017103 · Cited by 1,690
Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors.
Christian, M., Bradley, J. C., Wallace, J., & Burke, M. J. (2009) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016172 · Cited by 1,717
Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. G. M. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.10.007 · Cited by 1,808
Nahrgang, J. D., Morgeson, F. P., & Hofmann, D. A. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021484 · Cited by 1,826
THE IMPACT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT BREACH ON WORK‐RELATED OUTCOMES: A META‐ANALYSIS
Zhao, H., Wayne, S. J., Glibkowski, B., & BRAVO, J. (2007) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00087.x · Cited by 1,651
Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311415280 · Cited by 1,625
Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2009) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309335187 · Cited by 1,525
Seibert, S. E., Wang, G., & Courtright, S. H. (2011) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022676 · Cited by 1,666
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Rodell, J. B., Long, D. M., Zapata, C. P., Conlon, D. E., & Wesson, M. J. (2013) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031757 · Cited by 1,462
Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.678 · Cited by 2,126
Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. (2018) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206316665461 · Cited by 1,364
Wang, G., Oh, I.-S., Courtright, S. H., & Colbert, A. E. (2011) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/1059601111401017 · Cited by 1,315
Chiaburu, D. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1082 · Cited by 1,441
Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0018947 · Cited by 1,308
Relationship of personality to performance motivation: a meta-analytic review.
Judge, T., & Ilies, R. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.797 · Cited by 1,358
Kossek, E. E., Pichler, S. M., Bodner, T., & Hammer, L. B. (2011) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01211.x · Cited by 1,466
On the costs and benefits of emotional labor: A meta-analysis of three decades of research.
Hulsheger, U. R., & Schewe, A. F. (2011) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022876 · Cited by 1,389
Harrison, D. A., Newman, D. A., & Roth, P. L. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.20786077 · Cited by 1,245
Determinants of Entrepreneurial Intent: A Meta–Analytic Test and Integration of Competing Models
Schlaegel, C., & Koenig, M. (2013) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/etap.12087 · Cited by 1,409
A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net.
Payne, S. C., Youngcourt, S. S., & Beaubien, J. M. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.128 · Cited by 1,242
The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis.
de Wit, F., Greer, L. L., & Jehn, K. A. (2011) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0024844 · Cited by 1,308
Psychological Safety: A Meta‐Analytic Review and Extension
Frazier, M. L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R. L., Pezeshkan, A., & Vracheva, V. (2017) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12183 · Cited by 1,231
Bhaskar-Shrinivas, P., Harrison, D. A., Shaffer, M. A., & Luk, D. M. (2005) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2005.16928400 · Cited by 1,141
The relation between emotional intelligence and job performance: A meta-analysis
O'Boyle, E. H., Humphrey, R. H., Pollack, J. M., Hawver, T. H., & Story, P. A. (2011) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.714 · Cited by 1,122
Work and family satisfaction and conflict: A meta-analysis of cross-domain relations.
Ford, M. T., Heinen, B. A., & Langkamer, K. L. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.57 · Cited by 1,183
Rudolph, C. W., Katz, I. M., Lavigne, K. N., & Zacher, H. (2017) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2017.05.008 · Cited by 951
Relationships between psychological climate perceptions and work outcomes: a meta‐analytic review
Parker, C. P., Baltes, B. B., Young, S. A., Huff, J. W., Altmann, R. A., Lacost, H. A., & Roberts, J. E. (2003) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.198 · Cited by 1,079
The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis.
DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer‐Magnus, J. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017328 · Cited by 1,129
Continuities and Extensions of Ethical Climate Theory: A Meta-Analytic Review
Martin, K. D., & Cullen, J. B. (2006) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9084-7 · Cited by 1,025
CURRENT RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Markovsky, B. (1996) · Cited by 994
Working Memory and Intelligence: The Same or Different Constructs?
Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.30 · Cited by 969
Workplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: a theoretical model and meta-analysis.
Bowling, N. A., & Beehr, T. A. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.998 · Cited by 1,320
Predicting workplace aggression: A meta-analysis.
Hershcovis, M. S., Turner, N., Barling, J. I., Arnold, K. A., Dupré, K. E., Inness, M., LeBlanc, M. M., & Sivanathan, N. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.228 · Cited by 948
Cao, Z. J., & Lumineau, F. (2014) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2014.09.009 · Cited by 996
The customer is not always right: customer aggression and emotion regulation of service employees
Grandey, A. A., Dickter, D. N., & Sin, H. (2004) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.252 · Cited by 984
Born to burnout: A meta-analytic path model of personality, job burnout, and work outcomes
Swider, B. W., & Zimmerman, R. D. (2010) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2010.01.003 · Cited by 929
Doing More with Less: Innovation Input and Output in Family Firms
Durán, P., Kammerlander, N. H., van Essen, M., & Zellweger, T. M. (2015) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0424 · Cited by 956
Make, Buy, or Ally: A Transaction Cost Theory Meta-Analysis
Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J. E. M., & Kumar, N. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.21794670 · Cited by 925
Role of social desirability in personality testing for personnel selection: The red herring.
Öneş, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Reiss, A. D. (1996) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.660 · Cited by 924
Self-citationThe Construct of Work Commitment: Testing an Integrative Framework.
Cooper-Hakim, A., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.2.241 · Cited by 920
Self-citationThoresen, C. J., Kaplan, S. A., Barsky, A. P., Warren, C. R., & de Chermont, K. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.6.914 · Cited by 617
Stressors and child and adolescent psychopathology: Moving from markers to mechanisms of risk.
Grant, K. E., Compas, B. E., Stuhlmacher, A. F., Thurm, A. E., McMahon, S. D., & Halpert, J. A. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.447 · Cited by 969
Self-efficacy and work-related performance: The integral role of individual differences.
Judge, T. A., Jackson, C. L., Shaw, J. C., Scott, B. A., & Rich, B. L. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.107 · Cited by 976
The job demands-resources model: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies
Lesener, T., Gusy, B., & Wolter, C. (2018) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678373.2018.1529065 · Cited by 1,116
Shafer, A. B. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.20213 · Cited by 837
Firm Innovativeness and Its Performance Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration
Rubera, G., & Kirca, A. H. (2012) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.10.0494 · Cited by 877
Rudolph, C. W., Lavigne, K. N., & Zacher, H. (2017) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2016.09.002 · Cited by 837
Relationships between personality variables and burnout: A meta-analysis
Alarcon, G., Eschleman, K. J., & Bowling, N. A. (2009) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678370903282600 · Cited by 804
Self-determination theory applied to physical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vasconcellos, D., Parker, P. D., Hilland, T., Cinelli, R., Owen, K. B., Kapsal, N., Lee, J., Antczak, D., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., et al. (2020) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000420 · Cited by 811
Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) and Performance: A Meta‐Analytic Review
Martin, R., Guillaume, Y., Thomas, G., Lee, A., & Epitropaki, O. (2016) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12100 · Cited by 809
Strategic resources and performance: a meta‐analysis
Crook, T. R., Ketchen, D. J., Combs, J. G., & Todd, S. Y. (2008) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.703 · Cited by 851
Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings.
Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D. S., & Schmidt, F. L. (1996) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.557 · Cited by 505
Self-citationThe Role of Person Versus Situation in Life Satisfaction: A Critical Examination.
Heller, D. A., Watson, D., & Ilieș, R. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.574 · Cited by 836
A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness
Wang, D., Waldman, D. A., & Zhang, Z. (2014) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034531 · Cited by 731
Regulatory focus and work-related outcomes: A review and meta-analysis.
Lanaj, K., Chang, C.-H. D., & Johnson, R. E. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0027723 · Cited by 759
Hagger, M. S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2009) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1348/135910708x373959 · Cited by 538
Salesperson Adaptive Selling Behavior and Customer Orientation: A Meta-Analysis
Franke, G. R., & Park, J.-E. (2006) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.4.693 · Cited by 705
Petter, S., & McLean, E. R. (2009) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2008.12.006 · Cited by 787
Abusive supervision: A meta-analysis and empirical review
Mackey, J. D., Frieder, R. E., Brees, J. R., & Martinko, M. J. (2017) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206315573997 · Cited by 706
metaSEM: an R package for meta-analysis using structural equation modeling
Cheung, M. W. ‐. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01521 · Cited by 740
Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants
Sabherwal, R., Jeyaraj, A., & Chowa, C. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0583 · Cited by 685
Lee, E., Park, T., & Koo, B. (2015) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000012 · Cited by 701
Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: A two-stage approach.
Cheung, M. W. ‐., & Chan, W. (2005) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.10.1.40 · Cited by 671
Do Team and Individual Debriefs Enhance Performance? A Meta-Analysis
Tannenbaum, S. I., & Cerasoli, C. P. (2012) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720812448394 · Cited by 647
Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology
Anderson, N. R., Öneş, D. S., Sinangil, H. K., & Viswesvaran, C. (2001) · Sage eBooks · Cited by 632
Self-citationVerbeke, W., Dietz, B., & Verwaal, E. (2010) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-010-0211-8 · Cited by 677
Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.162 · Cited by 639
Employee proactivity in organizations: A comparative meta‐analysis of emergent proactive constructs
Thomas, J. P., Whitman, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2010) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317910x502359 · Cited by 678
Self-citationYou can take it with you: Individual differences and expatriate effectiveness.
Shaffer, M. A., Harrison, D. A., Gregersen, H. B., Black, J. S., & Ferzandi, L. A. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.109 · Cited by 622
Montaño, D., Reeske, A., Franke, F., & Hüffmeier, J. (2016) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2124 · Cited by 729
Tarka, P. (2017) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-017-0469-8 · Cited by 720
Clarke, S. (2013) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.2012.02064.x · Cited by 483
Chang, C.-H. D., Rosen, C. C., & Levy, P. E. (2009) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.43670894 · Cited by 646
Blut, M., & Wang, C. (2019) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-019-00680-8 · Cited by 675
Metadata
- Authors
- VISWESVARAN, C., & ONES, D. S.
- Affiliations
- Florida International University (US)
- Corresponding author
- VISWESVARAN, CHOCKALINGAM
- Venue
- Personnel Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 865-885
- ISSN
- 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6570
- OpenAlex
- W2051295428
- Cited by
- 926
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 36
- FWCI
- 7.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personnel Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Keywords
- theory testing, structural equation modeling, complex theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review