The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THEORY TESTING: COMBINING PSYCHOMETRIC META‐ANALYSIS AND STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS MODELING
Abstract
This paper presents an overview of a useful approach for theory testing in the social sciences that combines the principles of psychometric meta‐analysis and structural equations modeling. In this approach to theory testing, the estimated true score correlations between the constructs of interest are established through the application of meta‐analysis (Hunter & Schmidt, 1990), and structural equations modeling is then applied to the matrix of estimated true score correlations. The potential advantages and limitations of this approach are presented. The approach enables researchers to test complex theories involving several constructs that cannot all be measured in a single study. Decision points are identified, the options available to a researcher are enumerated, and the potential problems as well as the prospects of each are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We computed harmonic mean sample size (Viswesvaran & Ones, 1995) when conducting hierarchical multiple regression analyses because sample sizes differed across the cells in the meta-analytically derived correlation matrices.Computing harmonic mean sample size will yield more conservative estimates because less weight is given to large samples (Garrett, Miao, Qian, & Bae, 2017;Miao, Coombs, Qian, &”
From A cross-cultural meta-analysis of how leader emotional intelligence influences subordinate task performance and organizational citizenship behavior (2018) · cites this paper as Viswesvaran & Ones, 1995
In the citing paper
“A major advantage of this technique is that not all relationships specified by the theory need to be examined in each primary study, as the population correlations required can be meta-analytically computed (Joseph et al. 2007; Viswesvaran and Ones 1998).”
From Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model (2019) · cites this paper as Viswesvaran and Ones 1998
In the citing paper
“Prior literature suggests various possibilities such as using the minimum sample size, average sample size and harmonic mean sample size (e.g., Tett and Meyer 1993; Viswesvaran and Ones 1998).”
From Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model (2019) · cites this paper as Viswesvaran and Ones 1998
Citations
Cites
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
Research in Organizational Behavior.
Grimes, A. J., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392975 · Cited by 11,303
Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-5278 · Cited by 5,483
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Ghosh, S., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1988) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269814 · Cited by 4,730
Essentials of Psychological Testing
Rosner, B., & Cronbach, L. J. (1960) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419921 · Cited by 4,524
Cohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings.
Raudenbush, S. W., Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1991) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289738 · Cited by 2,368
Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies.
Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1977) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.32.9.752 · Cited by 2,154
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.12.1181 · Cited by 2,033
Personnel Selection in Organizations
Murphy, K. R., Schmitt, N., & Borman, W. C. (1993) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258598 · Cited by 1,646
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Bentler PM, 1989, Theory and implementation of EQS: A structural equations program [Computer software]
- Burke MJ, 1994, An empirical estimation of the effect of second order sampling error on ASVAB‐training proficiency validity estimates
- Jensen AR, 1980, Bias in mental testing
- Jöreskog KG, 1986, LISREL 6 user's guide: Analysis of linear shuctural relationships by the method of muximum likelihood
- Nunnally JC, 1978, Psychometric theory
- Oakes M., 1986, Statistical inference: A commentary for the social and behavioral sciences
- OnesDS. (1993).The construct validity of integriy tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of Iowa Iowa City.
- SchmidtFL. (in press).Quantitative methods and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for the training of researchers.Psychological Methods.
- SchmidtFL HunterJE. (in press).Measurement error in industrial/organizational psychology research: Lessons from 26 research scenarios.Psychological Methods.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 929
Current methods for meta-analysis
Schulze, R. (2007) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1027/0044-3409.215.2.90 · Cited by 79
Do Parenting Practices and Child Disclosure Predict Parental Knowledge? A Meta-Analysis
Liu, D., Chen, D., & Brown, B. B. (2019) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-019-01154-4 · Cited by 90
Byron, K., Keem, S., Darden, T. R., Shalley, C. E., & Zhou, J. (2022) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12501 · Cited by 93
The problem of effect size heterogeneity in meta-analytic structural equation modeling.
Yu, J., Downes, P. E., Carter, K. M., & O’Boyle, E. H. (2016) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000141 · Cited by 81
Leong, L.-Y., Hew, T.-S., Ooi, K.-B., Metri, B., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-022-10337-7 · Cited by 80
Zeng, R., Grøgaard, B., & Steel, P. (2018) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2018.02.001 · Cited by 80
Team tenure and team performance: A meta‐analysis and process model
Gonzalez-Mule, E. N., Cockburn, B. S., McCormick, B. W., & Zhao, P. (2019) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12319 · Cited by 84
Exploring the Antecedents of Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior (UPB): A Meta-Analysis
Luan, Y., Zhao, K., Wang, Z., & Hu, F. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-022-05269-w · Cited by 101
Only time will tell: The changing relationships between LMX, job performance, and justice.
Park, S., Sturman, M. C., Vanderpool, C., & Chan, E. K. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038907 · Cited by 98
A Meta-Analysis of Incremental Validity and Nomological Networks for Subordinate and Peer Rating
Conway, J. M., Lombardo, K., & Sanders, K. C. (2001) · Human Performance · doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1404_1 · Cited by 84
When feeling safe isn’t enough
Sanner, B., & Bunderson, J. S. (2015) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/2041386614565145 · Cited by 96
Intangible assets and SMEs’ export behavior: a meta-analytical perspective
Mansion, S. E., & Bausch, A. (2019) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-019-00182-5 · Cited by 89
Subsidiary autonomy and subsidiary performance: A meta-analysis
Geleilate, J.-M. G., Andrews, D. S., & Fainshmidt, S. (2019) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2019.101049 · Cited by 80
Users’ acceptance of private automated vehicles: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Kaye, S.-A., Somoray, K., Rodwell, D., & Lewis, I. M. (2021) · Journal of Safety Research · doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2021.10.002 · Cited by 78
Johnson, W., Brett, C. E., & Deary, I. J. (2009) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2009.11.008 · Cited by 78
Han, Y., & Hansen, H. (2012) · International Journal of Psychological Studies · doi:10.5539/ijps.v4n1p22 · Cited by 78
Davies, S. E., Connelly, B. S., Ones, D. S., & Birkland, A. S. (2015) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.006 · Cited by 77
A meta-analysis of eWallet adoption using the UTAUT model
Bommer, W. H., Rana, S., & Milevoj, E. (2022) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijbm-06-2021-0258 · Cited by 103
Jiang, L., Lawrence, A. L., & Xu, X. V. (2022) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2652 · Cited by 93
Tyrväinen, O., Karjaluoto, H., & Ukpabi, D. C. (2023) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1177/10949968231157281 · Cited by 93
Video Game Acceptance: A Meta-Analysis of the Extended Technology Acceptance Model
Wang, X.-H., & Goh, D. (2017) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2017.0086 · Cited by 60
HEXACO Personality and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Domain- and Facet-Level Meta-Analysis
Pletzer, J. L., Oostrom, J. K., & de Vries, R. E. (2021) · Human Performance · doi:10.1080/08959285.2021.1891072 · Cited by 89
Hwang, H., & Park, H. I. (2022) · Journal of Consumer Affairs · doi:10.1111/joca.12497 · Cited by 97
Is knowledge really the most important strategic resource? A meta‐analytic review
Bergh, D. D., D’Oria, L., Crook, T. R., & Roccapriore, A. Y. (2024) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3645 · Cited by 97
Caron, A., Lafontaine, M., Bureau, J., Lévesque, C., & Johnson, S. M. (2012) · Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement · doi:10.1037/a0028013 · Cited by 75
Does liking explain variance above and beyond LMX? A meta-analysis
Dulebohn, J. H., Wu, D., & Liao, C. (2016) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.008 · Cited by 86
What drives consumers to shop on mobile devices? Insights from a Meta-Analysis
Luceri, B., Bijmolt, T. H. A., Bellini, S., & Aiolfi, S. (2022) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2022.02.002 · Cited by 80
A Comparative Analysis of Small Business Strategic Orientation: Implications for Performance
Ogbari, M. E., Ibidunni, A. S., Ogunnaike, O., Olokundun, A. M., & Amaihian, A. B. (2018) · Covenant University Repository (Covenant University) · Cited by 73
Drivers and outcomes of team psychological empowerment
Maynard, M. T., Mathieu, J. E., Gilson, L. L., O’Boyle, E. H., & Cigularov, K. P. (2012) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/2041386612456868 · Cited by 84
Drivers of Sales Performance: A Contemporary Meta-Analysis
Verbeke, W., Dietz, B., & Verwaal, E. (2010) · RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) · Cited by 73
Are you attracted? Do you remain? Meta-analytic evidence on flexible work practices
Onken-Menke, G., Nüesch, S., & Kröll, C. (2017) · BuR - Business Research · doi:10.1007/s40685-017-0059-6 · Cited by 72
Quinn, J. M., & Wagner, R. K. (2018) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13049 · Cited by 79
Meijerink, J., Beijer, S. E., & Bos-Nehles, A. C. (2020) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2020.1810737 · Cited by 93
McCarthy, J. M., & Goffin, R. D. (2005) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2005.00325.x · Cited by 71
Bilgili, T. V., Calderon, C. J., Allen, D. G., & Kedia, B. L. (2016) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206316635252 · Cited by 71
Validity of the alcohol purchase task: a meta‐analysis
Kiselica, A. M., Webber, T. A., & Bornovalova, M. A. (2015) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.13254 · Cited by 78
Factors of stickiness in transfers of know-how between MNC units
Montazemi, A., Pittaway, J., Qahri-Saremi, H., & Wei, Y.-H. (2012) · Journal of strategic information systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2012.01.001 · Cited by 79
Testing moderator hypotheses in meta-analytic structural equation modeling using subgroup analysis
Jak, S., & Cheung, M. W. ‐. (2018) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1046-3 · Cited by 69
Drivers of Consumer Adoption of e-Commerce: a Meta-Analysis
Zerbini, C., Bijmolt, T. H. A., Maestripieri, S., & Luceri, B. (2022) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2022.04.003 · Cited by 68
Halpert, J. A., Stuhlmacher, A. F., Crenshaw, J. L., Litcher, C. D., & Bortel, R. (2010) · Negotiation and Conflict Management Research · doi:10.1111/j.1750-4716.2010.00051.x · Cited by 50
A meta‐analytic investigation of the personal and work‐related antecedents of work–family balance
Vaziri, H., Wayne, J. H., Casper, W. J., Lapierre, L., Greenhaus, J. H., Amirkamali, F., & Li, Y. (2021) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2594 · Cited by 96
Pak, S., Kramer, A., Lee, Y., & Kim, K. (2021) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2595 · Cited by 78
From goal motivation to goal progress: the mediating role of coping in the Self-Concordance Model
Gaudreau, P., Carraro, N., & Miranda, D. (2011) · Anxiety Stress & Coping · doi:10.1080/10615806.2011.628015 · Cited by 76
How is safety climate formed? A meta-analysis of the antecedents of safety climate
He, Y., Wang, Y., & Payne, S. C. (2019) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/2041386619874870 · Cited by 81
Leonidou, L. C., Eteokleous, P. P., Christofi, A.-M., & Korfiatis, N. (2022) · Journal of business research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.027 · Cited by 69
Predicting presence: Constructing the Tendency toward Presence Inventory
Thornson, C. A., Goldiez, B. F., & Le, H. (2008) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.08.006 · Cited by 68
A Tale of Two Transfers: Disentangling Maximum and Typical Transfer and Their Respective Predictors
Huang, J. L. W., Blume, B. D., Ford, J. K., & Baldwin, T. T. (2015) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-014-9394-1 · Cited by 78
Topa, G., Domínguez, J. F. M., & Depolo, M. (2008) · The Spanish Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1017/s113874160000425x · Cited by 67
Behson, S. J., Eddy, E. R., & Lorenzet, S. J. (2000) · Current research in social psychology · Cited by 67
Ivarsson, A., Tranæus, U., Johnson, U., & Stenling, A. (2017) · Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.2147/oajsm.s112688 · Cited by 66
Kraft, P. S., Günther, C., Kammerlander, N. H., & Lampe, J. (2022) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2022.106207 · Cited by 65
Kirca, A. H., & Yaprak, A. (2010) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2010.01.001 · Cited by 65
Wang, G., Seibert, S. E., & Boles, T. L. (2011) · Research on emotion in organizations · doi:10.1108/s1746-9791(2011)0000007006 · Cited by 65
A meta‐analysis of sleep and work performance: An examination of moderators and mediators
Henderson, A. A., & Horan, K. A. (2020) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2486 · Cited by 68
Potosky, D., Bobko, P., & Roth, P. L. (2005) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2005.00327.x · Cited by 64
Connelly, B. S., & Hulsheger, U. R. (2011) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00744.x · Cited by 65
Hoffman, B. J., Kennedy, C. L., LoPilato, A. C., Monahan, E. L., & Lance, C. E. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038707 · Cited by 71
Fresé, M., Bausch, A., Schmidt, P., Rauch, A., & Kabst, R. (2012) · Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1561/0300000044 · Cited by 64
Guo, Y., Wang, S., Rofcanın, Y., & Heras, M. L. (2024) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2024.103988 · Cited by 82
Connelly, B. S., & Chang, L. (2016) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12161 · Cited by 59
Ju, B., Lee, Y., Park, S., & Yoon, S. W. (2021) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484320987363 · Cited by 71
Do Grittier People Have Greater Subjective Well-Being? A Meta-Analysis
Hou, X., Becker, N., Hu, T., Koch, M., Xi, J., & Mõttus, R. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672211053453 · Cited by 61
Ranjan, K. R., Sugathan, P., & Rossmann, A. (2015) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-01-2014-0029 · Cited by 65
Goering, D. D., Shimazu, A., Zhou, F., Wada, T., & Sakai, R. (2017) · Burnout Research · doi:10.1016/j.burn.2017.05.003 · Cited by 80
Beyond Meta-Analysis: Secondary Uses of Meta-Analytic Data
Oh, I. (2019) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-045006 · Cited by 70
Tehrani, H. D., & Yamini, S. (2020) · Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101687 · Cited by 61
Viswesvaran, C., & Öneş, D. S. (2002) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.1080/08959285.2002.9668092 · Cited by 65
Self-citationCheung, C., & Yeung, J. W. K. (2010) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.10.004 · Cited by 59
Knowledge sharing in hospitality organizations: A meta-analysis
Lim, S., & Ok, C. “. (2021) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102940 · Cited by 59
A Meta-Analysis of Implicit and Explicit Attitudes in Children and AdolescentsPreprint
Phipps, D. J., Hagger, M. S., & Hamilton, K. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/52jrs · Cited by 59
Lin, X. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09554-w · Cited by 69
Integrating leadership research: a meta-analytical test of Yukl’s meta-categories of leadership
Borgmann, L., Rowold, J., & Bormann, K. C. (2016) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-07-2014-0145 · Cited by 60
Modeling the behavior of the 4/5ths rule for determining adverse impact: Reasons for caution.
Roth, P. L., Bobko, P., & Switzer, F. S. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.507 · Cited by 60
Analyzing matrices of meta‐analytic correlations: current practices and recommendations
Sheng, Z., Kong, W., Cortina, J. M., & Hou, S. (2016) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1206 · Cited by 60
Low Self-Esteem as a Risk Factor for Eating Disorders: A Meta-Analysis
Colmsee, I.-S. O., Hank, P., & Bošnjak, M. (2021) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie · doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000433 · Cited by 68
Huang, W., Roscoe, R. D., Craig, S. D., & Johnson‐Glenberg, M. C. (2021) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331211053630 · Cited by 68
Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhou, J., Liu, C., Zhang, X., & Yu, T. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1039375 · Cited by 105
Psychological contract breach and outcomes: Combining meta-analysis and structural equation models.
Topa, G., Domínguez, J. F. M., & Depolo, M. (2008) · PubMed · Cited by 56
How Organizational Identity Affects Team Functioning: The Identity Instrumentality Hypothesis
Mesmer‐Magnus, J., Asencio, R., Seely, P. W., & DeChurch, L. A. (2015) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206315614370 · Cited by 60
Human resource management in the North American automotive industry
Zacharatos, A., Hershcovis, M. S., Turner, N., & Barling, J. I. (2007) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/00483480710726127 · Cited by 55
Humble leadership and its outcomes: A meta-analysis
Luo, Y., Zhang, Z., Chen, Q., Zhang, K., Wang, Y., & Peng, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.980322 · Cited by 66
Durán, W. F., & Aguado, D. (2022) · Journal of Management & Organization · doi:10.1017/jmo.2022.24 · Cited by 58
Ethical Climate at the Frontline: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation
Friend, S. B., Jaramillo, F., & Johnson, J. S. (2020) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670519898261 · Cited by 60
Zhao, X., Wang, J., Law, R., & Fan, X. (2020) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/ijchm-05-2020-0371 · Cited by 65
Relationship between human capital, new venture ideas, and opportunity beliefs: A meta‐analysis
Canavati, S., Libaers, D. P., Wang, T., Hooshangi, S., & Sarooghi, H. (2021) · Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal · doi:10.1002/sej.1397 · Cited by 56
Correcting for indirect range restriction in meta-analysis: Testing a new meta-analytic procedure.
Le, H. Q., & Schmidt, F. L. (2006) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.11.4.416 · Cited by 53
Kraft, P. S. (2022) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12649 · Cited by 57
The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: a continuation
Mesmer‐Magnus, J., Niler, A. A., Plummer, G., Larson, L., & DeChurch, L. A. (2017) · Career Development International · doi:10.1108/cdi-08-2017-0140 · Cited by 62
Lin, X., & Powell, S. R. (2021) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543211054576 · Cited by 60
A Meta-Analysis of the Factor Structure of the Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS)
Li, H., Liu, J., & Hunter, C. V. (2019) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2018.1551184 · Cited by 57
Park, H. (., Wiernik, B. M., Oh, I.-S., Gonzalez-Mulé, E., Ones, D. S., & Lee, Y. (2020) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000476 · Cited by 57
Synthesizing Indirect Effects in Mediation Models With Meta-Analytic Methods
Cheung, M. W. ‐. (2021) · Alcohol and Alcoholism · doi:10.1093/alcalc/agab044 · Cited by 59
Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: A mega-meta path analysis
Miller, B. K., Wan, M., Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Thompson, M. J. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0263631 · Cited by 61
Accounting for Missing Correlation Coefficients in Fixed-Effects MASEM
Jak, S., & Cheung, M. W. ‐. (2017) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2017.1375886 · Cited by 52
Recommendations for Reviewing Meta-Analyses in Organizational Research
DeSimone, J. A., Brannick, M. Τ., O’Boyle, E. H., & Ryu, J. W. (2020) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428120967089 · Cited by 51
Oswald, F. L., & JOHNSON, J. (1998) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.164 · Cited by 49
Shen, X., Xu, Q., & Liu, Q. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0275312 · Cited by 52
Hsu, N., Newman, D. A., & Badura, K. (2022) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence10040104 · Cited by 73
Neuropsychological Predictors of Outcome Following Traumatic Brain Injury in Adults: a Meta-Analysis
Allanson, F., Pestell, C., Gignac, G. E., Yeo, Y. X., & Weinborn, M. (2017) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-017-9353-5 · Cited by 58
Some reflections on combining meta‐analysis and structural equation modeling
Cheung, M. W. ‐. (2018) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1321 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- VISWESVARAN, C., & ONES, D. S.
- Affiliations
- Florida International University (US)
- Corresponding author
- VISWESVARAN, CHOCKALINGAM
- Venue
- Personnel Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 865-885
- ISSN
- 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6570
- OpenAlex
- W2051295428
- Cited by
- 926
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 36
- FWCI
- 7.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personnel Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Keywords
- theory testing, structural equation modeling, complex theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review