The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THEORY TESTING: COMBINING PSYCHOMETRIC META‐ANALYSIS AND STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS MODELING
Abstract
This paper presents an overview of a useful approach for theory testing in the social sciences that combines the principles of psychometric meta‐analysis and structural equations modeling. In this approach to theory testing, the estimated true score correlations between the constructs of interest are established through the application of meta‐analysis (Hunter & Schmidt, 1990), and structural equations modeling is then applied to the matrix of estimated true score correlations. The potential advantages and limitations of this approach are presented. The approach enables researchers to test complex theories involving several constructs that cannot all be measured in a single study. Decision points are identified, the options available to a researcher are enumerated, and the potential problems as well as the prospects of each are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We computed harmonic mean sample size (Viswesvaran & Ones, 1995) when conducting hierarchical multiple regression analyses because sample sizes differed across the cells in the meta-analytically derived correlation matrices.Computing harmonic mean sample size will yield more conservative estimates because less weight is given to large samples (Garrett, Miao, Qian, & Bae, 2017;Miao, Coombs, Qian, &”
From A cross-cultural meta-analysis of how leader emotional intelligence influences subordinate task performance and organizational citizenship behavior (2018) · cites this paper as Viswesvaran & Ones, 1995
In the citing paper
“A major advantage of this technique is that not all relationships specified by the theory need to be examined in each primary study, as the population correlations required can be meta-analytically computed (Joseph et al. 2007; Viswesvaran and Ones 1998).”
From Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model (2019) · cites this paper as Viswesvaran and Ones 1998
In the citing paper
“Prior literature suggests various possibilities such as using the minimum sample size, average sample size and harmonic mean sample size (e.g., Tett and Meyer 1993; Viswesvaran and Ones 1998).”
From Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model (2019) · cites this paper as Viswesvaran and Ones 1998
Citations
Cites
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
Research in Organizational Behavior.
Grimes, A. J., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392975 · Cited by 11,303
Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-5278 · Cited by 5,483
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Ghosh, S., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1988) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269814 · Cited by 4,730
Essentials of Psychological Testing
Rosner, B., & Cronbach, L. J. (1960) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1419921 · Cited by 4,524
Cohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings.
Raudenbush, S. W., Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1991) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289738 · Cited by 2,368
Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies.
Smith, M. L., & Glass, G. V. (1977) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.32.9.752 · Cited by 2,154
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.12.1181 · Cited by 2,033
Personnel Selection in Organizations
Murphy, K. R., Schmitt, N., & Borman, W. C. (1993) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258598 · Cited by 1,646
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Bentler PM, 1989, Theory and implementation of EQS: A structural equations program [Computer software]
- Burke MJ, 1994, An empirical estimation of the effect of second order sampling error on ASVAB‐training proficiency validity estimates
- Jensen AR, 1980, Bias in mental testing
- Jöreskog KG, 1986, LISREL 6 user's guide: Analysis of linear shuctural relationships by the method of muximum likelihood
- Nunnally JC, 1978, Psychometric theory
- Oakes M., 1986, Statistical inference: A commentary for the social and behavioral sciences
- OnesDS. (1993).The construct validity of integriy tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of Iowa Iowa City.
- SchmidtFL. (in press).Quantitative methods and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for the training of researchers.Psychological Methods.
- SchmidtFL HunterJE. (in press).Measurement error in industrial/organizational psychology research: Lessons from 26 research scenarios.Psychological Methods.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 929
Combs, J., Crook, T. R., & Rauch, A. (2018) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12427 · Cited by 143
Miao, C., Humphrey, R. H., & Qian, S. (2017) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.031 · Cited by 185
Yu, A., Matta, F. K., & Cornfield, B. (2017) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2016.1212 · Cited by 163
Carnes, C. M., Xu, K., Sirmon, D. G., & Karadag, R. (2018) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12391 · Cited by 165
Landis, R. S. (2013) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9285-x · Cited by 155
Hartnell, C., Ou, A., Kinicki, A., Choi, D., & Karam, E. P. (2019) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000380 · Cited by 135
Cheung, M. W. ‐., & Chan, W. (2009) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705510802561295 · Cited by 150
Nohe, C., & Hertel, G. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01364 · Cited by 144
A Meta‐Analytic Integration of Acquisition Performance Prediction
King, D. R., Wang, G., Samimi, M., & Cortes, A. F. (2020) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12636 · Cited by 153
Young, H. R., Glerum, D. R., Joseph, D. L., & McCord, M. A. (2021) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320908646 · Cited by 143
Effects of Explanations on Applicant Reactions: A meta‐analytic review
Truxillo, D. M., Bodner, T., Bertolino, M., Bauer, T. N., & Yonce, C. A. (2009) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00478.x · Cited by 155
Gedikli, Ç., Miraglia, M., Connolly, S., Bryan, M. L., & Watson, D. J. (2022) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2022.2106855 · Cited by 202
Borman, W. C., Hanson, M. A., & Hedge, J. W. (1997) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.299 · Cited by 145
Good, V., Hughes, D. E., Kirca, A. H., & McGrath, S. (2022) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-021-00827-6 · Cited by 140
The complementarity of strategic orientations: A meta‐analytic synthesis and theory extension
Schweiger, S. A., Stettler, T. R., Baldauf, A., & Zamudio, C. (2019) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3042 · Cited by 147
Cheung, M. W. ‐., & Cheung, S. F. (2016) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1166 · Cited by 148
Is perfect good? A meta-analysis of perfectionism in the workplace.
Harari, D., Swider, B. W., Steed, L. B., & Breidenthal, A. P. (2018) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000324 · Cited by 120
Burkhard, B., Sirén, C. A., van Essen, M., Grichnik, D., & Shepherd, D. A. (2022) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063221110203 · Cited by 146
The role of psychological capital in employee creativity
Yu, X., Li, D., Tsai, C.-H., & Wang, C. (2019) · Career Development International · doi:10.1108/cdi-04-2018-0103 · Cited by 158
Bedi, A. (2019) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12238 · Cited by 145
Ilies, R., Gerhardt, M. W., & Le, H. (2004) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/j.0965-075x.2004.00275.x · Cited by 125
Hoobler, J. M., Hu, J. J., & Wilson, M. S. (2010) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2010.07.001 · Cited by 134
Team adaptation in context: An integrated conceptual model and meta-analytic review
Christian, J. S., Christian, M. S., Pearsall, M. J., & Long, E. C. (2017) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.01.003 · Cited by 138
Consumer behavior in social commerce: Results from a meta-analysis
Mou, J., & Benyoucef, M. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120734 · Cited by 169
Change-oriented behavior: A meta-analysis of individual and job design predictors
Marinova, S. V., Peng, C., Lorinkova, N., Dyne, L. V., & Chiaburu, D. S. (2015) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2015.02.006 · Cited by 144
A meta‐analytic test of the differential pathways linking ethical leadership to normative conduct
Peng, A. C., & Kim, D. (2020) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2427 · Cited by 151
Herhausen, D., Morgan, R. E., Brozović, D., & Volberda, H. (2020) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12413 · Cited by 146
Jak, S., Li, H., Kolbe, L., de Jonge, H., & Cheung, M. W. ‐. (2021) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1498 · Cited by 128
Antecedents and outcomes of authentic leadership across culture: A meta-analytic review
Zhang, Y. E., Guo, Y., Zhang, M., Xu, S., Liu, X., & Newman, A. (2021) · Asia Pacific Journal of Management · doi:10.1007/s10490-021-09762-0 · Cited by 158
Lievens, F., & Conway, J. M. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1202 · Cited by 128
A Multilevel Examination of the Drivers of Firm Multinationality
Kirca, A. H., Hult, G. T. M., Deligonul, S. Z., Perryy, M. Z., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310369177 · Cited by 131
Yang, L., Caughlin, D. E., Gazica, M. W., Truxillo, D. M., & Spector, P. E. (2014) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0036905 · Cited by 127
Mackay, M. M., Allen, J. A., & Landis, R. S. (2016) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.03.002 · Cited by 161
Factors Affecting the Adoption of an Electronic Word of Mouth Message: A Meta-Analysis
Qahri‐Saremi, H., & Montazemi, A. R. (2019) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2019.1628936 · Cited by 144
Understanding the effects of time perspective: A meta-analysis testing a self-regulatory framework.
Baird, H. M., Webb, T. L., Sirois, F. M., & Miller, J. G. (2020) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000313 · Cited by 142
Self‐leadership: A meta‐analysis of over two decades of research
Harari, M. B., Williams, E. A., Castro, S. L., & Brant, K. K. (2021) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12365 · Cited by 195
Miao, C., Coombs, J. E., Qian, S., & Sirmon, D. G. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.03.016 · Cited by 126
Cheung, M. W. ‐., & Hong, R. Y. S. (2017) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2017.1343678 · Cited by 126
Zyphur, M. J., Bonner, C. V., & Tay, L. (2022) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041621-031401 · Cited by 147
Fragkos, K., Makrykosta, P., & Frangos, C. (2019) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.14289 · Cited by 114
Third‐Party Logistics: A Meta‐Analytic Review and Investigation of its Impact on Performance
Leuschner, R., Carter, C. R., Goldsby, T. J., & Rogers, Z. S. (2013) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/jscm.12046 · Cited by 131
Meriac, J. P., Hoffman, B. J., Woehr, D. J., & Fleisher, M. S. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1042 · Cited by 132
Trust in Interorganizational Relationships
Zhong, W., Su, C., Peng, J., & Yang, Z. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314546373 · Cited by 128
Chamberlin, M., Newton, D. W., & LePine, J. A. (2018) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2295 · Cited by 137
Factors Influencing Sponsorship Effectiveness: A Meta-Analytic Review and Research Synthesis
Kim, Y., Lee, H., Magnusen, M., & Kim, M. (2014) · Journal of Sport Management · doi:10.1123/jsm.2014-0056 · Cited by 121
Organizational Controls and Performance Outcomes: A Meta‐Analytic Assessment and Extension
Sihag, V., & Rijsdijk, S. A. (2018) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12342 · Cited by 135
Weber, W., Unterrainer, C., & Höge, T. (2019) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12205 · Cited by 132
Students' career exploration: A meta-analysis
Kleine, A., Schmitt, A., & Wisse, B. M. (2021) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103645 · Cited by 121
Hiller, N. J., Sin, H.-P., Ponnapalli, A. R., & Ozgen, S. (2019) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.11.003 · Cited by 144
Butts, M. M., Lunt, D. C., Freling, T. H., & Gabriel, A. S. (2019) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.006 · Cited by 129
The state of research on leader humor
Kong, D. T., Cooper, C. D., & Sosik, J. J. (2019) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/2041386619846948 · Cited by 135
Lee, Y., Berry, C. M., & Gonzalez-Mule, E. N. (2019) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000421 · Cited by 131
Abusive Supervision and Employee Deviance: A Multifoci Justice Perspective
Park, H., Hoobler, J. M., Wu, J., Liden, R. C., Hu, J. J., & Wilson, M. S. (2017) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3749-2 · Cited by 130
Work engagement or burnout: Which comes first? A meta-analysis of longitudinal evidence
Maricutoiu, L. P., Șulea, C., & Iancu, A. (2017) · Burnout Research · doi:10.1016/j.burn.2017.05.001 · Cited by 121
Personality and expatriate adjustment: A meta‐analysis
Harari, M. B., Reaves, A. C., Beane, D. A., Laginess, A. J., & Viswesvaran, C. (2018) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12215 · Cited by 123
Self-citationSpitzmüller, M., Sin, H., Howe, M. D., & Fatimah, S. (2015) · Human Performance · doi:10.1080/08959285.2015.1021041 · Cited by 125
Guo, J. L., Wang, T. F., Liao, J., & Huang, C.-C. (2015) · Applied Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2015.03.016 · Cited by 114
Saeed, S., Yousafzai, S., Paladino, A., & Luca, L. D. D. (2015) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.02.037 · Cited by 112
Michel, J. S., Clark, M. A., & Jaramillo, D. (2010) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2010.12.010 · Cited by 124
Clarke, S. (2012) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0029817 · Cited by 112
Goad, E. A., & Jaramillo, F. (2014) · Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management · doi:10.1080/08853134.2014.899471 · Cited by 120
Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: an updated meta-analysis
Soares, M. D. C., & Perin, M. G. (2019) · RAUSP Management Journal · doi:10.1108/rausp-01-2019-0014 · Cited by 233
The Role of Work Environment in Training Sustainment: A Meta-Analysis
Hughes, A. M., Zajac, S. A., Woods, A. L., & Salas, E. (2019) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720819845988 · Cited by 125
Katz, B. A., Matanky, K., Aviram, G., & Yovel, I. (2020) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101842 · Cited by 109
Is a happy leader a good leader? A meta-analytic investigation of leader trait affect and leadership
Joseph, D. L., Dhanani, L. Y., Shen, W., McHugh, B. C., & McCord, M. A. (2015) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.04.001 · Cited by 122
The effectiveness of publicity versus advertising: a meta-analytic investigation of its moderators
Eisend, M., & Küster-Rohde, F. (2010) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-010-0224-3 · Cited by 107
Lang, J. W. B., Kersting, M., Hulsheger, U. R., & Lang, J. (2010) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01182.x · Cited by 121
An integrated model of condom use in Sub-Saharan African youth: A meta-analysis.
Protogerou, C., Johnson, B. T., & Hagger, M. S. (2018) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000604 · Cited by 104
Cognitive reflection, cognitive intelligence, and cognitive abilities: A meta-analysis
Otero, I., Salgado, J. F., & Moscoso, S. (2021) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2021.101614 · Cited by 126
Retaining the Productive Employee: The Role of Personality
Li, N., Barrick, M. R., Zimmerman, R. D., & Chiaburu, D. S. (2014) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2014.890368 · Cited by 116
Chang, W., Franke, G. R., Butler, T. D., Musgrove, C. F., & Ellinger, A. E. (2014) · The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.2753/mtp1069-6679220301 · Cited by 101
Designing Adaptive Instruction for Teams: a Meta-Analysis
Sottilare, R. A., Burke, C. S., Eduardo Salas, A., Sinatra, A. M., Johnston, J. H., & Gilbert, S. B. (2017) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-017-0146-z · Cited by 101
A meta‐analysis of the nomological network of knowledge hiding in organizations
Arain, G. A., Bhatti, Z. A., Hameed, I., Khan, A. K., & Rudolph, C. W. (2022) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12562 · Cited by 106
Penela, A. C., Sanmartín, E. R., González, P. Á., & Paillé, P. (2023) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113984 · Cited by 121
The social network side of individual innovation
Baer, M., Evans, K., Oldham, G. R., & Boasso, A. M. (2015) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/2041386614564105 · Cited by 128
Furlow, C. F., & Beretvas, S. N. (2005) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.10.2.227 · Cited by 97
Reinhold, S., Gegenfurtner, A., & Lewalter, D. (2018) · International Journal of Training and Development · doi:10.1111/ijtd.12115 · Cited by 111
Job characteristics, employee well-being, and job performance of public sector employees in Malaysia
Johari, J., Shamsudin, F. M., Yean, T. F., Yahya, K. K., & Adnan, Z. (2018) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-09-2017-0257 · Cited by 136
Koutsoumpis, A., Oostrom, J. K., Holtrop, D., van Breda, W., Ghassemi, S., & de Vries, R. E. (2022) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000381 · Cited by 102
Vincent, L., Bharadwaj, S. G., & Challagalla, G. N. (2004) · Cited by 95
Vagnani, G., & Volpe, L. (2017) · International Journal of Innovation Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijis.2017.10.001 · Cited by 112
A Counterintuitive Hypothesis About Employment Interview Validity and Some Supporting Evidence.
Schmidt, F. L., & Zimmerman, R. D. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.553 · Cited by 103
Headrick, L., Newman, D. A., Park, Y., & Liang, Y. (2022) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-022-09821-3 · Cited by 125
The impact of strategic dissent on organizational outcomes: A meta‐analytic integration
Samba, C., van Knippenberg, D., & Miller, C. C. (2017) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2710 · Cited by 98
Halbusi, H. A., Al‐Sulaiti, K. I., Abbas, J., & Al-Sulaiti, I. (2022) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.942527 · Cited by 109
Dingel, J., Kleine, A., Cecil, J., Sigl, A., Lermer, E., & Gaube, S. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/57224 · Cited by 116
Vize, C. E., Collison, K. L., Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2018) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2137 · Cited by 97
Mackey, J. D., McAllister, C. P., Maher, L. P., & Wang, G. A. (2018) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12286 · Cited by 102
McCabe, J. E. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0034835 · Cited by 103
Liu, Y., Guo, J., & Chi, N. (2015) · Management and Organization Review · doi:10.1017/mor.2015.17 · Cited by 89
Opportunities and Threats in Reviewing Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
Rauch, A. (2019) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258719879635 · Cited by 100
Schwens, C., Zapkau, F. B., Bierwerth, M., Isidor, R., Knight, G., & Kabst, R. (2017) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/etap.12280 · Cited by 97
RetractedInternational Marketing Standardization
Tan, Q., & Sousa, C. M. P. (2013) · Management International Review · doi:10.1007/s11575-013-0172-5 · Cited by 88
A meta-analysis of social media fatigue: Drivers and a major consequence
Ou, M., Zheng, H., Kim, H. K., & Chen, X. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107597 · Cited by 94
Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1998) · Human Performance · doi:10.1080/08959285.1998.9668033 · Cited by 294
Self-citationPrayoonsri, B., Tatsirin, S., Suntorapot, D., & Jariya, C. (2015) · Educational Research and Reviews · doi:10.5897/err2015.2371 · Cited by 93
Kraft, P. S., & Bausch, A. (2016) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12335 · Cited by 92
Block, J., Hansen, C., & Steinmetz, H. (2022) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/10422587221084249 · Cited by 86
Knotts, K. G., Houghton, J. D., Pearce, C. L., Chen, H., Stewart, G. L., & Manz, C. C. (2021) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2021.1953988 · Cited by 114
Simple View of Reading in Chinese: A One-Stage Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling
Peng, P., Lee, K., Luo, J., Li, S., Malatesha, R. N., & Tao, S. (2020) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654320964198 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- VISWESVARAN, C., & ONES, D. S.
- Affiliations
- Florida International University (US)
- Corresponding author
- VISWESVARAN, CHOCKALINGAM
- Venue
- Personnel Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 865-885
- ISSN
- 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6570
- OpenAlex
- W2051295428
- Cited by
- 926
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 36
- FWCI
- 7.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personnel Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Keywords
- theory testing, structural equation modeling, complex theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review