The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A REVIEW OF STRUCTURE IN THE SELECTION INTERVIEW
Abstract
Virtually every previous review has concluded that structuring the selection interview improves its psychometric properties. This paper reviews the research literature in order to describe and evaluate the many ways interviews can be structured. Fifteen components of structure are identified that may enhance either the content of the interview or the evaluation process in the interview. Each component is explained in terms of its various operationalizations in the literature. Then, each component is critiqued in terms of its impact on numerous forms of reliability, validity, and user reactions. Finally, recommendations for research and practice are presented. It is concluded that interviews can be easily enhanced by using some of the many possible components of structure, and the improvement of this popular selection procedure should be a high priority for future research and practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Unit weighting schemes for decision making
Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1975) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(75)90044-6 · Cited by 673
Causes and effects of my disturbing little book
Meehl, P. E. (1986) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5003_6 · Cited by 410
Cited by
Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners
(2001) · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science · doi:10.1007/978-0-306-47630-3 · Cited by 1,041
MORGESON, F. P., REIDER, M. H., & CAMPION, M. A. (2005) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.655.x · Cited by 538
Self-citationPosthuma, R. A., Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (2002) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00103.x · Cited by 340
Self-citationThe use of impression management tactics in structured interviews: A function of question type?
Ellis, A. P. J., West, B. J., Ryan, A. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1200 · Cited by 293
The employment interview: A review of current studies and directions for future research
Macan, T. (2009) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.03.006 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- CAMPION, M. A., PALMER, D. K., & CAMPION, J. E.
- Venue
- Personnel Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 655-702
- ISSN
- 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6570
- OpenAlex
- W2056987009
- Cited by
- 519
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A REVIEW OF STRUCTURE IN THE SELECTION INTERVIEW. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00709.x
- The paper
- CAMPION, M. A., PALMER, D. K., & CAMPION, J. E. (1997). A REVIEW OF STRUCTURE IN THE SELECTION INTERVIEW. Personnel Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00709.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
