The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CAREER SELF‐MANAGEMENT: A QUASI‐EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTS OF A TRAINING INTERVENTION
Abstract
A growing trend is to encourage employees to become actively involved in the management of their own careers. Career self‐management, the degree to which one regularly gathers information and plans for career problem solving and decision making, includes two main behaviors: developmental feedback seeking and job mobility preparedness. Although career self‐management training is a commonly used employer intervention to re‐socialize individuals to increase their own career management activity, it is rarely rigorously evaluated. Relying on an expectancy theory framework, the goal of this study was to evaluate the general effects of career self‐management training using a quasi‐experimental design. Based on data from several hundred professionals at a major U.S. employer, the results showed formal training efforts were generally not successful in resocializing people to engage in career self‐management activities, and when done as an isolated human resource strategy, decreased trainees' likelihood of engaging in career self‐management behaviors. To the extent that Time 2 expectancy perceptions got worse, the results showed that an individual's attitudes toward feedback seeking mediated the relationship between the training intervention and the level of preparation for job mobility conducted 6‐8 months following the training.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.311 · Cited by 1,831
SELF-REGULATION FOR MANAGERIAL EFFECTIVENESS: THE ROLE OF ACTIVE FEEDBACK SEEKING.
Ashford, S. J., & Tsui, A. S. (1991) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/256442 · Cited by 774
Cited by
The science of training: a decade of progress
Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.471 · Cited by 1,703
The Contemporary Career: A Work–Home Perspective
Greenhaus, J. H., & Kossek, E. E. (2014) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091324 · Cited by 391
Self-citationJob Search and Voluntary Turnover in a Boundaryless world: a Control Theory Perspective
Direnzo, M. S., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0333 · Cited by 277
Career Management Strategies of People With Disabilities
Kulkarni, M., & Gopakumar, K. V. (2014) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21570 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- KOSSEK, E. E., ROBERTS, K., FISHER, S., & DEMARR, B.
- Venue
- Personnel Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 935-960
- ISSN
- 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6570
- OpenAlex
- W1967609748
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CAREER SELF‐MANAGEMENT: A QUASI‐EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTS OF A TRAINING INTERVENTION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00746.x
- The paper
- KOSSEK, E. E., ROBERTS, K., FISHER, S., & DEMARR, B. (1998). CAREER SELF‐MANAGEMENT: A QUASI‐EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTS OF A TRAINING INTERVENTION. Personnel Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00746.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.