Perceived applicant fit: Distinguishing between recruiters’perceptions of person-job and person-organization fit
Abstract
Two studies were conducted to assess whether recruiters form distinguishable perceptions of applicant person‐job (P‐J) and person‐organization (P‐O) fit. The first study used repertory grid methodology with actual recruiters and mock applicants to demonstrate that knowledge, skills, and abilities are relied on more frequently to assess P‐J fit, and values and personality traits more often to assess P‐O fit. Study 2, which involved actual recruiters making decisions on applicants in a field setting, supported P‐J and P‐O fit perceptions as 2 discernable factors. Study 2 also found that both types of perceived fit offer unique prediction of hiring recommendations. Taken together, these results present compelling evidence that recruiters discriminate between applicants' P‐J and P‐O fit during early interviews.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
By interacting with those who are similar to oneself (or sharing similar values), individuals can achieve validation of their viewpoints.
“By interacting with those who are similar to oneself (or sharing similar values), individuals can achieve validation of their viewpoints [105].”
From What Influences Users’ Intention to Share Works in Designer-Driven User-Generated Content Communities? A Study Based on Self-Determination Theory (2023) · cites this paper as [105]
Cites
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689 · see citing works
The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure
Goldberg, L. R. (1992) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26 · Cited by 5,530 · see citing works
Distributive and procedural justice in the workplace
Folger, R. (1987) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/bf01048013 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Procrastination's Impact in the Workplace and the Workplace's Impact on Procrastination
Nguyen, B., Steel, P., & Ferrari, J. R. (2013) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12048 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Collaboration among recruiters and Artificial Intelligence: Removing human prejudices in employment
Chen, Z. (2023) · Cognition, Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s10111-022-00716-0 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Song, H., Wei, J., & Jiang, Q. (2023) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems11110540 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Included but undermined: How representation goals backfire
Osborne, M. R., Roberson, J. W., & Tost, L. (2025) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/cse5r_v2
- Authors
- KRISTOF‐BROWN, A. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- Corresponding author
- KRISTOF‐BROWN, AMY L.
- Venue
- Personnel Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 643-671
- ISSN
- 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6570
- OpenAlex
- W1979047360
- Cited by
- 616
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 11.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personnel Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Keywords
- person-job fit, person-organization fit, recruiter perceptions, candidate evaluation, hiring decisions, knowledge, skills and abilities, values, personality traits, repertory grid technique
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review