Cited by 616Employer Branding and e-HRMAI and HR TechnologiesJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Perceived applicant fit: Distinguishing between recruiters’perceptions of person-job and person-organization fit

KRISTOF‐BROWN, AMY L.·2000·Personnel Psychology

Abstract

Two studies were conducted to assess whether recruiters form distinguishable perceptions of applicant person‐job (P‐J) and person‐organization (P‐O) fit. The first study used repertory grid methodology with actual recruiters and mock applicants to demonstrate that knowledge, skills, and abilities are relied on more frequently to assess P‐J fit, and values and personality traits more often to assess P‐O fit. Study 2, which involved actual recruiters making decisions on applicants in a field setting, supported P‐J and P‐O fit perceptions as 2 discernable factors. Study 2 also found that both types of perceived fit offer unique prediction of hiring recommendations. Taken together, these results present compelling evidence that recruiters discriminate between applicants' P‐J and P‐O fit during early interviews.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00217.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
KRISTOF‐BROWN, A. L.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
KRISTOF‐BROWN, AMY L.
Venue
Personnel Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-09
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
643-671
ISSN
  • 0031-5826 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-6570
OpenAlex
W1979047360
Cited by
616
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 33
FWCI
11.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personnel Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
person-job fit, person-organization fit, recruiter perceptions, candidate evaluation, hiring decisions, knowledge, skills and abilities, values, personality traits, repertory grid technique

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review