Cited by 1,187School Health and Nursing EducationYouth Development and Social SupportEducational Environments and Student Outcomes

Promoting School Connectedness: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health

McNeely, Clea A., Nonnemaker, James M., Blum, Robert W.·2002·Journal of School Health

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Increasing evidence shows that when adolescents feel cared for by people at their school and feel like a part of their school, they are less likely to use substances, engage in violence, or initiate sexual activity at an early age. However, specific strategies to increase students' connectedness to school have not been studied. This study examined the association between school connectedness and the school environment to identify ways to increase students' connectedness to school. Data from the in‐school and school administrator surveys of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (75,515 students in 127 schools) and hierarchical linear models were used to estimate the association between school characteristics and the average level of school connectedness in each school. Positive classroom management climates, participation in extracurricular activities, tolerant disciplinary policies, and small school size were associated positively with higher school connectedness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2002.tb06533.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Teachers likely have a stronger impact on student SOBAS than schoolmates.

    “Although schoolmates influence a student's SOBAS, teachers likely have a stronger impact on student SOBAS not only because they control what happens in the classroom but also because they are likely viewed as the most proximal representative of their school.”

    From Students’ Sense of Belonging at School in 41 Countries: Cross-Cultural Variability (2016) · cites this paper as McNeely, Nonnemaker, & Blum, 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McNeely, C. A., Nonnemaker, J. M., & Blum, R. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • RTI International (US)
Venue
Journal of School Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-04
Volume
72
Issue
4
Pages
138-146
ISSN
  • 0022-4391 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-1561
OpenAlex
W2158189194
Cited by
1,187
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 90 · 2014: 77 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 68
FWCI
80.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of School Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Keywords
school connectedness, school environment, adolescent health, classroom management, extracurricular activities, discipline policy, school size, substance use, youth violence, adolescent sexual activity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Analysis of Variance, Attitude to Health, Faculty, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, School Health Services, Schools, Psychological Distance, Social Environment, Social Support, Students, United States, Organizational Culture, Linear Models, Needs Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review