Cited by 92Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesSchool Health and Nursing EducationGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

Preliminary Effectiveness of Surviving the Teens® Suicide Prevention and Depression Awareness Program on Adolescents' Suicidality and Self-Efficacy in Performing Help-Seeking Behaviors

King, Keith A., Strunk, Catherine M., Sorter, Michael T.·2011·Journal of School Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Suicide ranks as the third leading cause of death among youth aged 15-24 years. Schools provide ideal opportunities for suicide prevention efforts. However, research is needed to identify programs that effectively impact youth suicidal ideation and behavior. This study examined the immediate and 3-month effect of Surviving the Teens® Suicide Prevention and Depression Awareness Program on students' suicidality and perceived self-efficacy in performing help-seeking behaviors. METHODS: High school students in Greater Cincinnati schools were administered a 3-page survey at pretest, immediate posttest, and 3-month follow-up. A total of 1030 students participated in the program, with 919 completing matched pretests and posttests (89.2%) and 416 completing matched pretests and 3-month follow-ups (40.4%). RESULTS: Students were significantly less likely at 3-month follow-up than at pretest to be currently considering suicide, to have made a suicidal plan or attempted suicide during the past 3 months, and to have stopped performing usual activities due to feeling sad and hopeless. Students' self-efficacy and behavioral intentions toward help-seeking behaviors increased from pretest to posttest and were maintained at 3-month follow-up. Students were also more likely at 3-month follow-up than at pretest to know an adult in school with whom they felt comfortable discussing their problems. Nine in 10 (87.3%) felt the program should be offered to all high school students. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study lend support for suicide prevention education in schools. The results may be useful to school professionals interested in implementing effective suicide prevention programming to their students.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00630.x

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, K. A., Strunk, C. M., & Sorter, M. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
King, Keith A.
Venue
Journal of School Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-08-11
Volume
81
Issue
9
Pages
581-590
ISSN
0022-4391 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2138235092
Cited by
92
References
51
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of School Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
suicide prevention, adolescent suicidality, suicidal ideation, help-seeking, self-efficacy, depression awareness, school-based intervention, high school students, suicide prevention education
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Depression, Female, Health Education, Health Promotion, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Ohio, Psychometrics, Schools, Students, Suicide, Time Factors, Program Evaluation, Chi-Square Distribution, Program Development, Risk Assessment, Self Efficacy, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review