Cited by 152Treatment of Major DepressionNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Possible antidepressive effects of opioids: Action of buprenorphine

Emrich, H. M., Vogt, P., Herz, A.·1982·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1982.tb39483.x

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Emrich, H. M., Vogt, P., & Herz, A.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry (DE)
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1982-12
Volume
398
Issue
1
Pages
108-112
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2055208356
Cited by
152
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
buprenorphine, opioids, antidepressant effects, depression, opioid analgesics
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Buprenorphine, Clinical Trials as Topic, Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Morphinans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review