Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 476

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mechanism of Action of Camptothecin

LIU, LEROY F., DESAI, SHYAMAL D., LI, TSAI‐KUN, MAO, YONG, SUN, MEI, SIM, SAI‐PENG·2000·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A bstract:Camptothecin (CPT) class of compounds has been demonstrated to be effective against a broad spectrum of tumors. Their molecular target has been firmly established to be human DNA topoisomerase I (topo I). CPT inhibits topo I by blocking the rejoining step of the cleavage/religation reaction of topo‐I, resulting in accumulation of a covalent reaction intermediate, the cleavable complex. The primary mechanism of cell killing by CPT is S‐phase‐specific killing through potentially lethal collisions between advancing replication forks and topo‐I cleavable complexes. Collisions with the transcription machinery have also been shown to trigger the formation of long‐lived covalent topo‐I DNA complexes, which contribute to CPT cytotoxicity. Two novel repair responses to topo‐I‐mediated DNA damage involving covalent modifications of topo‐I have been discovered. The first involves activation of the ubiquitin/26S proteasome pathway, leading to degradation of topo‐I (CPT‐induced topo‐I downregulation). The second involves SUMO conjugation to topo‐I. The potential roles of these new mechanisms for repair of topo‐I‐mediated DNA damage in determining CPT sensitivity/resistance in tumor cells are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb07020.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
LIU, L. F., DESAI, S. D., LI, T., MAO, Y., SUN, M., & SIM, S.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-12
Volume
922
Issue
1
Pages
1-10
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W4297069849
Cited by
476
References
0
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.