Cited by 186Memory and Neural MechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is the Human Amygdala Specialized for Processing Social Information?

ADOLPHS, RALPH·2003·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A bstract : A number of studies in humans and other animals has confirmed the amygdala's role in modulating cognition and behavior on the basis of a stimulus' motivational, emotional, and social atttributes. This raises the question of how these attributes are related: is social information processing reducible to motivational processing? Some recent data suggest the possibility that the amygdala's primitive function may be motivational processing that is domain‐general, but that its function in primates, and especially humans, may have evolved to process social information specifically. While the issue is unresolved, future experiments could provide additional support.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07091.x

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Kling A.S. & L.A. Brothers. 1992. The amygdala and social behavior.InThe Amygdala: Neurobiological Aspects of Emotion Memory and Mental Dysfunction. J.P. Aggleton Ed. Wiley‐Liss. New York.
  2. Heberlein A.S., 1998, Impaired attribution of social meanings to abstract dynamic visual patterns following damage to the amygdala, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 24, 1176
  3. Baron‐Cohen S., 1997, Is there a “language of the eyes”, Evidence from normal adults and adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. Visual Cognit., 4, 311
  4. Amaral D.G. J.L. Price A. Pitkanen & S.T. Carmichael. 1992. Anatomical organization of the primate amygdaloid complex.InThe Amygdala: Neurobiological Aspects of Emotion Memory and Mental Dysfunction J.P. Aggleton Ed. :1–66. Wiley‐Liss. New York.
  5. Adolphs R. 2002. The Amygdala.InEncyclopaedia of Cognitive Science. L. Nadel Ed. MacMillan Press. New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 186

Metadata

Authors
ADOLPHS, R.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
ADOLPHS, RALPH
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-04
Volume
985
Issue
1
Pages
326-340
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W1966033532
Cited by
186
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
amygdala, social information processing, emotions, domain specificity, primate cognition
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Emotions, Humans, Motivation, Organ Specificity, Primates, Social Behavior, Species Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review