Cited by 772Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural MechanismsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Predictors of amygdala activation during the processing of emotional stimuli: A meta-analysis of 385 PET and fMRI studies

Costafreda, Sergi G., Brammer, Michael J., David, Anthony S., Fu, Cynthia H.Y.·2008·Brain Research Reviews

Abstract

Although amygdala activity has been purported to be modulated by affective and non-affective factors, considerable controversy remains on its precise functional nature. We conducted a meta-analysis of 385 functional neuroimaging studies of emotional processing, examining the effects of experimental characteristics on the probability of detecting amygdala activity. All emotional stimuli were associated with higher probability of amygdala activity than neutral stimuli. Comparable effects were observed for most negative and positive emotions, however there was a higher probability of activation for fear and disgust relative to happiness. The level of attentional processing affected amygdala activity, as passive processing was associated with a higher probability of activation than active task instructions. Gustatory-olfactory and visual stimulus modalities increased the probability of activation relative to internal stimuli. Aversive learning increased the probability of amygdala activation as well. There was some evidence of hemispheric specialization with a relative left-lateralization for stimuli containing language and a relative right-lateralization for masked stimuli. Methodological variables, such as type of analysis and magnet strength, were also independent predictors of amygdala activation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.10.012

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This result replicates earlier meta-analytic evidence and agrees with the hypothesis that the amygdala responds preferentially to salient exteroceptive rather than interoceptive sensations.

    “This finding replicates prior meta-analytic evidence (Costafreda et al. 2008) and is consistent with our hypothesis that the amygdala responds preferentially to salient exteroceptive (vs. interoceptive) sensations.”

    From The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review (2012) · cites this paper as Costafreda et al. 2008

  • The amygdala is a central structure in emotional processing, and the ACC and OFC are also critical substrates of the affective-cognitive interface.

    “while the amygdala is a central structure in emotional processing (Costafreda, 2008), ACC and OFC are also critical substrates of the affectivecognitive interface.”

    From Affective Cognition and its Disruption in Mood Disorders (2011) · cites this paper as Costafreda, 2008

  • The amygdala also supports stimulus-reinforcement learning for positive stimuli.

    “But the amygdala also supports stimulus-reinforcement learning as it relates to positive stimuli.16–18”

    From Neural Substrates of Childhood Anxiety Disorders (2012) · cites this paper as [16]

  • Adults show increased amygdala activation to fear faces relative to baseline, and children show similar activation while adolescents show heightened activation.

    “When viewing fear faces, adult humans show an increase in amygdala activation relative to amygdala activation during a baseline condition”

    From Neural Substrates of Childhood Anxiety Disorders (2012) · cites this paper as [16]

  • Passive viewing tasks show greater amygdala activation than tasks with specific demands, likely reflecting engagement of emotion regulation regions.

    “Neuroimaging studies using a passive viewing task—in which attention is not specifically constrained by the task—show greater amygdala activation than studies that use a specific task, such as gender discrimination or emotion rating.16,17”

    From Neural Substrates of Childhood Anxiety Disorders (2012) · cites this paper as [16]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Costafreda, S. G., Brammer, M. J., David, A. S., & Fu, C. H. Y.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Venue
Brain Research Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
57-70
ISSN
0165-0173 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974635983
Cited by
772
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 61
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
amygdala activation, emotional processing, emotional stimuli, fear, disgust, happiness, attentional processes, stimulus modality, aversive learning, hemispheric lateralization, masked stimuli, PET, functional MRI
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Amygdala, Emotions, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Middle Aged, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review