The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Services as an Approach for Conservation and Natural‐Resource Management
Abstract
Current approaches to conservation and natural‐resource management often focus on single objectives, resulting in many unintended consequences. These outcomes often affect society through unaccounted‐for ecosystem services. A major challenge in moving to a more ecosystem‐based approach to management that would avoid such societal damages is the creation of practical tools that bring a scientifically sound, production function‐based approach to natural‐resource decision making. A new set of computer‐based models is presented, the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs tool (InVEST) that has been designed to inform such decisions. Several of the key features of these models are discussed, including the ability to visualize relationships among multiple ecosystem services and biodiversity, the ability to focus on ecosystem services rather than biophysical processes, the ability to project service levels and values in space, sensitivity to manager‐designed scenarios, and flexibility to deal with data and knowledge limitations. Sample outputs of InVEST are shown for two case applications; the Willamette Basin in Oregon and the Amazon Basin. Future challenges relating to the incorporation of social data, the projection of social distributional effects, and the design of effective policy mechanisms are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/387253a0 · Cited by 22,585
Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis
Assessment, M. E. (2005) · Island Press · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18167309 · Cited by 10,665
HUMAN ALTERATION OF THE GLOBAL NITROGEN CYCLE: SOURCES AND CONSEQUENCES
Vitousek, P. M., Aber, J. D., Howarth, R. W., Likens, G. E., Matson, P. A., Schindler, D. W., Schlesinger, W. H., & Tilman, D. G. (1997) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0737:haotgn]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 5,390
Gassman, P. W., Reyes, M. R., Green, C. H., & Arnold, J. G. (2007) · Transactions of the ASABE · doi:10.13031/2013.23637 · Cited by 3,040
Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues
Engel, S., Pagiola, S., & Wunder, S. (2008) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011 · Cited by 2,466
Nelson, E., Mendoza, G., Regetz, J., Polasky, S., Tallis, H., Cameron, D., Chan, K. M., Daily, G. C., Goldstein, J., Kareiva, P. M., et al. (2009) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/080023 · Cited by 2,389 · cited 1×
“Recent work has taken strides in this vein (e.g., Boody et al. 2005; Jackson et al. 2005; Antle and Stoorvogel 2006; Naidoo and Ricketts 2006; Nelson et al. 2008; Nelson et al. 2009).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe statistics and biology of the species-area relationship
Connor, E. F., & McCoy, E. D. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283438 · Cited by 2,313
Ecosystem-Based Fishery Management
Pikitch, E. K., Santora, C., Babcock, E. A., Bakun, A., Bonfil, R., Conover, D. O., Dayton, P., Doukakis, P., Fluharty, D., Heneman, B., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1098222 · Cited by 2,312
The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values
Freeman III, A. M., Herriges, J. A., & Kling, C. L. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315780917 · Cited by 2,305
Soil Science Society of America: Report of the Treasurer
Pohlman, G. G. (1940) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1940.036159950004000c0132x · Cited by 1,993
Cited by
Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies
Power, A. G. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0143 · Cited by 2,334
Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment
Martín-López, B., Gómez-Baggethun, E., García-Llorente, M., & Montes, C. (2014) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.003 · Cited by 569
Complementary benefits of tourism and hunting to communal conservancies in Namibia
Naidoo, R., Weaver, L. C., Diggle, R. W., Matongo, G., Stuart‐Hill, G., & Thouless, C. (2016) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.12643 · Cited by 331
A general biodiversity–function relationship is mediated by trophic level
O'Connor, M. I., Gonzalez, A., Byrnes, J. E. K., Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gamfeldt, L., Griffin, J. N., Hooper, D., Hungate, B. A., Paquette, A., et al. (2017) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/oik.03652 · Cited by 173
Ochoa, V., & Urbina-Cardona, N. (2017) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.011 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Tallis, H., & Polasky, S.
- Venue
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 1162
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 265-283
- ISSN
- 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-6632
- OpenAlex
- W2056619009
- Cited by
- 616
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 16.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Services as an Approach for Conservation and Natural‐Resource Management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04152.x
- The paper
- Tallis, H., & Polasky, S. (2009). Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Services as an Approach for Conservation and Natural‐Resource Management. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04152.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
